If I were a person not familiar with college wrestling but wanted to see what it was like and tuned into yesterday's match on ESPN, I'd probably write it off as a sport to watch in my leisure time. As pointed out, Iowa, the winner of the match, had more stalling warnings than takedowns. There was only one bonus point out of the ten matches. It was boring, even for someone who has been involved with the sport for over 50 years. It was basically Rutgers v. VT from a couple weeks ago with different teams. It's not an attractive product.
When I was in high school, our wrestling team was a very new program with little fan support. Our coach, in his third year and my third year, convinced the school to have an assembly to introduce the sport to the students. I was one of the wrestlers picked to wrestle an exhibition match. I was paired with a wrestler whom I had wrestled with and against for 3 years. We realized if we wrestled a "real" match, it was not going to be very exciting for fans being introduced to the sport, so we worked out a plan the have a match that would look real to them, have a lot of scoring and action and end in a tie. It went over very well and I don't think anyone knew what we had done. Yesterday looked like the match we could have wrestled if we weren't concerned with making the sport fun to watch - especially for new fans.
Almost every time I watch a D1 college wrestling dual meet, I fight a strong urge to turn it off because nothing is happening other than thinly veiled stalling for most of the matches. I do think we are spoiled and blessed by Penn State's style.a But I, for one, am very appreciative of it - especially when watching something like yesterday's match.