Who was the victim you refer to? The one "known only to God"? Quite a novel prosecutorial strategy, don't you think? Perhaps "how do we anchor this thing to Penn State"?
Last edited:
Lord Has Strong Words For Victims.
- Thread starter dshumbero
- Start date
Anchor it to PSU? We had a grad assistant witness the crime. That's not concocted. Time to come to grips with reality.
The Grad Assistant witnessed JS and a kid showering. The OAG did the concocting.
He witnessed IN 2001 something that no one he talked to considered "a crime".
The only certifiable Crime was committed by the OAG in 2011 when they got MM to "reconsider" what he saw and to now discover that what he saw in 2001 was what they "legally needed" to link Sandusky with Penn States "Deep Pockets". It also allowed Tommy Boy to collect on his "bounty" for destroying Joe Paterno in spite of Fina's DIRECT public admission that "no evidence supported a coverup" by Penn State Football or Paterno.
The "cover-up" evidence that has become part of this illusion is the "Summary Statement" made by Freeh in his "Investigation" (opinion). In spite of the totally contradictory evidence and testimony of Fina (of all people) ---- in 2017 the Public still quotes misinformation contained in the Freeh Fiction as "PROOF" that Paterno and Penn State "Covered up for a serial pedophile CONTINUOUSLY for YEARS".
This entire Sandusky matter is one that can only be believable IF (and I stress IF) you (1) IGNORE the total inconsistencies of the "evidence" that has been presented AND (2) you require Penn State produce certified "video confirmation" of those issues that normally create a defense. REMEMBER ---- all evidence is 15+ years old - TOTAL trash - that's why we have Statutes of Limitations.
But that's only what the "victim" testified to later. Why would anyone believe that? Jive knows things even the victims themselves don't know. And don't forget there were those slapping sounds...
No, he witnessed more than that. Sexual slapping sounds and skin to skin contact. He witnessed an sexual act.
How pray tell do you identify sexual slapping sounds from others? Only a complete moron would buy that. Slapping sounds so loud MM heard them over running showers and a closed door. Someone must have ended up in the hospital.....
slapping sounds so loud....and yet the poor victim showed no distress.....according to the prize witness. By the way, did he testify to the stool in the shower for the victim to stand on? lol
So you don't like what MM consistently said he witnessed so you just make up an excuse as to why we shouldn't believe it. Par for the course.
Meanwhile, in the real world, the public understands what that means and accepts it as sexual.
The masses are asses. Most folks don't spend the time to really think the narrative thru. Where is the "victim?" Only God knows! I spent a career in and out of locker rooms. No one hears slapping sounds thru closed doors in a locker room with multiple shower heads dropping water on a tiled floor. Jerry was a ped who was about to be convicted and MM was the key to making sure PSU was the focus and not TSM and Commonwealth agencies.
MM has been consistent with hearing sexual slapping sounds. Dr. D's testimony backs that claim. Sorry you don't like it, but it is what he witnessed.
What next? Are you going to embrace the crying janitor with Commonwealth Dementia Fable? You know, the one where he testifies that the person he saw WAS NOT Sandusky?
Again, all we have is an alleged ear witness.
Keep putting your fingers in your ears and your head in the sand. It's not going to change the fact, verified in court, that Sandusky assaulted a boy that night. That is reality.
The conflation of "slapping sounds", into being he melody of "JS ass-ramming a 10 year old kid", shows us two things:
1 - Just how incredibly deceitful and evil the OAG folks are
And
2 - Just how incredibly stupid the average "public" is
For six F-ing years
May there was no inserton, just slapping? That is still indecent assault.
How come the public is so smart in 2017, but the people Mike told in 2001 were so dumb?
Mike told the grand jury that:
1) He did not see fondling
2) He did not see arousal
3) He did not see Sandusky's hands
4) He did not see penetration
5) He did not see distress on the boy's face
6) He only caught a 2-3 second glimpse through a reflection in the mirror around a corner
When do you think Mike went from being uncomfortable with seeing Jerry and a boy in the shower, to being certain he witnessed a sexual act? Do you think it was when the police told him they knew he was sexting coeds with his university issued cell phone? When he realized they knew he had gambled on PSU while a player? His wife would have surely divorced him for the former and Joe would have probably fired him for either. Or was it when his attorney told him that he could break the bank with his whistle blower lawsuit?
That is your reality. If there was an assault where is the victim?
I think he knew it right away. He was shocked and disgusted but he knew it right away.
Assaults only happen when the victim is identified? Interesting.
I believe the only slapping sounds that MM’Q heard and the only skin to skin contact he was exposed to was his father smacking him across the face for being incoherent and drunk.
Here is a very intense sexual engagement…..hear the slapping sounds??
Wasn't there a lot of chatter that Jerry also had erectile dysfunction and was not taking meds to address it?
To be fair, if he was into little boys...wouldn't it be possible that his wife wasn't cutting it for him in that department? That seems pretty likely and I would imagine that is why his team would never present that as a defense. I could be wrong there though.
With the lack of any other evidence (other MM testimony) a victim's testimony saying "Yes, I saw a big red headed dude in the locker room while Jerry was molesting me" would go a long way here.
Crazed bikers tossed him a) down a well; b) down a mineshaft over drugs according to JockstrapJacobs; c) witness protection to avoid the crazed bikers. There was a great deal of fear(?) associated with the Spanier trial. Jurors were not to be identified by name or drawing (even though some came forward afterwards).
What was Judge Pokeafella so afraid of?
Maybe the judge didn't want people like Ziggy pawing through jurors' trash cans if they returned a verdict that people like him found to be unfavorable.
INFORMATION....The State of PA is concerned about the public having factual information on everything it has done since 2010.
Reason for the extreme level of information control is that the "cracks" in the "Case" that they have constructed, both about Sandusky (and by this I mean THE LEGAL CASE) and the cover-up "Story" of Paterno & PSU "Criminal Culture" would be exposed to question, criticism and then further investigation. This is something PACORN and their "backers" can NOT allow to happen. Hiding REAL $$$ Crimes and political abuse are at stake!
This is why, AFTER 6+ Years, there are ACTIVE attempts to maintain and control the "Story" of deception they created in 2011.
Everyone has their own opinion on the Spanier Trial and results. I am not alone in having an opinion which is based upon the results and how the court itself has been used to create the "opportunity" for media distortion so that the absurd "Story" of PSU guilt is maintained. What I see in objectively reviewing the evidence provided to the jury is that, on legal evidence alone, there was exposed the absurdity of bringing Spanier to trial. The actions taken by C/S/S BASED ON 2001 information available is totally reasonable. Under any form of analysis it was not any form of "crime". Yet, in spite of the strength of the "no evidence" in this case, the Jury convicted Spanier on a misdemeanor.
This action by the jury mathematically proved that the Jury pool was so tainted that a biased trial, based on media-fed and OAG spotlighted illusions from the past 6 years, was assured. This is what Curley & Shultz - both much closer to MAKING the decisions PSU made concerning Sandusky - feared and why they were FORCED to take the plea bargain offered.
Which brings us to the INFORMATION LEAK that terrifies the State (and the Judge who was hand selected to run the trail). Think back....when did the State of PA expose ANY factual data on anyone here in which the data it Publicly provided DID NOT HAVE SIGNIFICANT opportunity for "information tampering"??
It is the media's responsibility to inform the public of "facts" on events they report on. WHEN HAS THIS HAPPENED in the past 6 years with PSU? It is INFORMATION management that has been used to deceive the public throughout this matter. It is this control of what the public knows that PACORN needs to maintain (and expand if possible) in the foreseeable future. The judge is just one of their "control valves".
^^^. When this guy started posting (or at least when I noticed his posts), I said something along the lines of "I love this guy".
Posts like this one are why I feel that way.
