i have become convinced that H.S. ratings are “generally” accurate. So our line up has. 3 five stars and probably 12 4 stars and the rest 3 stars except maybe Jan Johnson. We are better at every position save 1-2 against App St and better except 4-5 against Pitt.
Yes we are young but AS was younger.
My question is over time why didn’t our superior talent prevail.
Our guys over rated? I doubt it
Our schemes to complex for young guys? Maybe
We don’t develop guys -I don’t think so
Our guys flat? Easy explanation but I didn’t see it.
If number 2 why don’t we make it simple and let superior talent prevail
Yes we are young but AS was younger.
My question is over time why didn’t our superior talent prevail.
Our guys over rated? I doubt it
Our schemes to complex for young guys? Maybe
We don’t develop guys -I don’t think so
Our guys flat? Easy explanation but I didn’t see it.
If number 2 why don’t we make it simple and let superior talent prevail
