That's the thing many fans are overlooking. I read an article awhile back that pointed out that the top NFL producing schools - like Alabama, OSU, Georgia etc... - don't have to shell out the money and point to the end result to recruits which is basically getting them to the NFL where the huge money is at.Jeremiah Smith reportedly got less NIL money from OSU than other schools that were after him (FSU and Miami). One of their 5* WR recruits from last year's class told a reporter that OSU wasn't offering him as much in NIL as the southern schools, but he valued his future NFL draft stock more.
The lesson here is that coaching makes all the difference. We can make ourselves feel better by suggesting that OSU just buys everybody and Michigan just cheats. But at the end of the day, those programs have outcoached us.
(if it was simply a matter of NIL money and recruiting rankings, then OSU's OL play should have been much better than what it was. That's coaching, too)
I travel all of the boards and a perfect example are the Auburn sites-fans that are constantly harping that Alabama are buying recruits, Uh no, they don't have to as they point to their NFL success. I believe they currently have the most NFL players and - if I remember correctly - OSU is 2nd. If anyone has to shell out huge money for recruits, it's schools like Auburn but don't try to convince some of their blockhead fans that
Last edited: