Official Graham Spanier trial thread.
- Thread starter BobPSU92
- Start date
No need, I think it's you that needs to go back and read their post. Maybe edit it to make sense?
It's gonna be warm tomorrow. Maybe I'll take a ride to HBG if the jury has been settled. It's either that or spending all day washing my shoelaces.
Well, with confidentiality my first thought is a victim, but I'm not sure what they might have to testify about that's relevant to the state showing Spanier's guilt. Other interesting potential guesses could be Fran Ganter or Sloane, which could open the door to learning more about 1998 - although I'm not sure why either would be referred to as confidential.
someone who plans to ride his bike to Harrisburg.
and that's a BINGO!
Are you kidding??? The Pennlive trolls will be there. If they can find their way to the courthouse and a place to park their bicycles that is.
Crowd hasn't changed.They did release a picture of him:
The way things are going they are going to get a medium to come and channel JoePa...
If you're correct, that points pretty strongly to Steve Sloane. Could 1998 be more strongly in the mix after all?
Wouldn't it be something if the state could actually produce a witness who hasn't been compromised?
Just because someone's on a witness list doesn't mean they are going to get called as a witness.
I'm tempted to agree. I think you and I have discussed the curious case of John Seasock on various occasions on this board once or twice over the years.
Yes I very much hope this trial straightens out who brought him into the equation.
Either a prominent figure ... a coach who's gone on to NFL or another college, a former governor, a well-known former player, a former FBI director
or
Someone that they want to avoid being tampered with before their testimony, some current or former PSU employee with inside knowledge, not someone who's spoken previously on record
or
a victim/accuser
A medium? For this crowd, make it a XXXL.
I bet the confidential witness is v2. He said Sandusky told him that a psu admin might be calling since the admin told Sandusky that someone reported seeing the two of them in a sexual situation in the showers.
I like "outside the box" thinking like this!
Now I'll buy you a beer.
Technically "outside the river" thinking, but point taken.
Or maybe the confidential witness is a smokescreen and there is no such thing.
If they can produce Ray Gricar, I'd be happy to accept that C/S/S and Paterno were all complicit in this whole thing and TSM is completely innocent.
I thought that as well.....but the whole notion of called Schultz and Curley could be a lark as well. So much gamesmanship at this point. It will be interesting to see how it turns out.
I can't see any of those witnesses boding particularly well for Spanier.
Well....he would certainly be "confidential"....
We've been told he is "Known only to God"
Truth be told, I cant imagine it would be the person who has been playing the role of V2 (since I know there are those who are consternated as to who is the "real" V2
).....he would be a horrendous witness for the Prosecution.There were aspects that the Sandusky PCRA attorney couldn't get into.....but that would be open season for GS.....that the Prosecution would not want to have opened up.
Last edited:
