Yes, they played better, but there was a massive difference in the plays in this game. Surely you could see that. I counted only one play that I thought wasn't particularly good (3rd and 4 bomb to Hamler in double coverage), but that might just have been Clifford's choice on the receiver. Maybe there was a choice to get the first down.
We saw lots of quick short passes, spreading the field and getting guys in space. There were screen plays, not always executed that well, but they were called. It was an entirely different look than the Pitt game.