Well, the constant exposure certainly helps OSU and Michigan. Increased exposure can't hurt, but alas, we will never know.
Plausible, but I think you overestimate how many people are actually watching.
Well, the constant exposure certainly helps OSU and Michigan. Increased exposure can't hurt, but alas, we will never know.
More would probably watch if it wasn't the OSU-Michigan channel. Personally, I have no need to watch every OSU-Michigan game ever played.Plausible, but I think you overestimate how many people are actually watching.
You realize that if everything was perfectly equal in that channel, PSU would be getting even less exposure, right?Well, the constant exposure certainly helps OSU and Michigan. Increased exposure can't hurt, but alas, we will never know.
More would probably watch if it wasn't the OSU-Michigan channel. Personally, I have no need to watch every OSU-Michigan game ever played.
No, I would guess about the same because OSU and Michigan would have to give up all their numerous time slots, which would open it up for all the rest of the teams.You realize that if everything was perfectly equal in that channel, PSU would be getting even less exposure, right?
Man, on here arguing with everyone again. Wow....maybe you should start to wonder if you really are a PSU fan (which I'm pretty sure you're not). So if you admit it's less than OSU and Michigan, that in itself means we're getting jobbed. This is a conference of 14 members...what justification can there be that two of those members get obvious and complete preferential treatment? Getmyjive motto...it's okay to treat me like shit as long as you treat someone else worse.
No, we would definitely get less. You are not aware just how little they show the other teams.No, I would guess about the same because OSU and Michigan would have to give up all their numerous time slots, which would open it up for all the rest of the teams.
I've seen a lot of Iowa, Wiscy and NW. So those three plus PSU would get about the same and the rest of the teams would eat into OSU and Michigan's unending time slots.No, we would definitely get less. You are not aware just how little they show the other teams.
No, we really would get less.I've seen a lot of Iowa, Wiscy and NW. So those three plus PSU would get about the same and the rest of the teams would eat into OSU and Michigan's unending time slots.
How so? Please break it down for me.No, we really would get less.
Yet they have not gotten around to making a "big ten elite" about the 94 team. I like that they have one about the 94 Nebraska team even though they were in the big12(8?) at the time...makes sense
We get more time than NW, Indy, MD, Rutgers, Iowa, Illinois, Minny, Nebraska, Purdue, Wisky and MSU. It's not hard to figure out.How so? Please break it down for me.
They have our 1986 team.Yet they have not gotten around to making a "big ten elite" about the 94 team. I like that they have one about the 94 Nebraska team even though they were in the big12(8?) at the time...makes sense
I know, it just pisses me off that they have one for the 94 Nebraska team but not ours. As if that whole situation wasn't messing up enough already