I don't know if you read my lengthy post from yesterday but there are reasons I'm going to wait and see what the response is to the discovery motion. I'm not saying that this isn't sleazy police conduct being alleged, but I see a lot of people making assumptions about what actually happened based solely on Ludwick's deposition, which for me raised more questions than answers. And I'm not expressing skepticism merely b/c I'm a PSU fan and these were Iowa and ISU kids, I'm wary because almost all fourth amendment case law has over the past few decades has replaced what were once rights with exceptions and carve-outs. SCOTUS has routinely found instances where they've simultaneously conceded that a right was violated but that there was nevertheless nothing you can do about it (which typically means the evidence can be introduced regardless of the constitutional violation). And forget about a private cause of action, this doesn't approach getting around the qualified immunity pollice enjoy. I mean, sure, go and get outraged, even before all the facts are in, but everything that's been alleged is fairly routine, you're only noticing it because it concerns athletes.