ADVERTISEMENT

Pat Fitzgerald suspended 2 weeks in Northwestern hazing inquiry

I really don't think it is. You are using very similar words that the media used to pillory Paterno. "HIS" locker room. As has been stated, Fitz told all players it was "Their" space...not the coaches. "Culture" in his program. I remember with Joe, it was the CULTURE that he built/sustained that put kids at risk and HIS football program was placed above the abused kids...that was the media interpretation of Joe's culture. Is Fitz only responsible for the locker room? Is it also HIS campus? HIS dorm rooms? After all, they are HIS players. HE recruited them. If it was truly sexual assault taking place, why didn't the player file criminal complaints against the players? 6 month investigation is meaningless in the eyes of a those rush to judgment. I would have thought we of all people would understand more than the norm.
Exactly. they can prove things like running sprints and carrying equipment. These are OK by me. But then they "suggest," things like naked snaps and the upper class persons blocked the shower. Hell, maybe the upper class got to shower first and the rookies had to wait until they were done. Is that bad? Do teams not shower together anymore?
 
It was our mistake. Penn State allowed the sanctions to happen...in fact gave the NCAA the power to do so

This. The sanctions at PSU only happened because of the tacit approval - hell, invitation - by PSU leadership. If PSU wasn't willing to go along with it, we never would have experienced any penalties let alone anything that severe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bison13
You can tell who's still fixating on what happened here and can't accept that was wrong and similar wrongs aren't good simply because we got screwed. It's honestly sad adults can't comprehend that. Take emotion out of it for once. Fitzgerald had nothing to do with what happened here nor did Northwestern
 
I really don't think it is. You are using very similar words that the media used to pillory Paterno. "HIS" locker room. As has been stated, Fitz told all players it was "Their" space...not the coaches. "Culture" in his program. I remember with Joe, it was the CULTURE that he built/sustained that put kids at risk and HIS football program was placed above the abused kids...that was the media interpretation of Joe's culture. Is Fitz only responsible for the locker room? Is it also HIS campus? HIS dorm rooms? After all, they are HIS players. HE recruited them. If it was truly sexual assault taking place, why didn't the player file criminal complaints against the players? 6 month investigation is meaningless in the eyes of a those rush to judgment. I would have thought we of all people would understand more than the norm.
Sandusky used the Second Mile to identify, groom and abuse children. One could argue the culture of that organization was child sexual abuse. he used PSU resources as props and opportunities to further his grooming and abusing activities. Paterno did not establish a culture of child sexual abuse on the part of his players or coaches. Certainly there could be a legitimate argument around what did he and others see and try not to see with Sandusky, But that is a different sort of accountability than the coach who manages the players on his team and sets the cultural values of the team. The NW players were doing this, and seems pretty out in the open. Somehow they got the message that this was sanctioned, allowable, maybe even encouraged behavior on that team. And if Fitz really did not know he had very poor management structure in place that assistant coaches and grad assistants and team "leaders" and the "leadership council" had to know and did not communicate it back to Fitz. So people who reported to Fitz had to know about this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obliviax
Sandusky used the Second Mile to identify, groom and abuse children. One could argue the culture of that organization was child sexual abuse. he used PSU resources as props and opportunities to further his grooming and abusing activities. Paterno did not establish a culture of child sexual abuse on the part of his players or coaches. Certainly there could be a legitimate argument around what did he and others see and try not to see with Sandusky, But that is a different sort of accountability than the coach who manages the players on his team and sets the cultural values of the team. The NW players were doing this, and seems pretty out in the open. Somehow they got the message that this was sanctioned, allowable, maybe even encouraged behavior on that team. And if Fitz really did not know he had very poor management structure in place that assistant coaches and grad assistants and team "leaders" and the "leadership council" had to know and did not communicate it back to Fitz. So people who reported to Fitz had to know about this.
don't forget, coaches can't be present at "voluntary" practices due to practice limitations.

I totally agree on JoePa. He was tangentially involved with the first JS event (the one that investigators fully investigated) and was only involved in one or two meetings in the MM event. To this day, I have no idea how the second mile got off scot-free except that there must have been a lot of politicians involved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bison13
So leaders are not responsible for ensuring subordinates are behaving appropriately or at the very least having systems in place to ensure it?

Sure, I'll play ball. First, we don't still know what "It" is. We have an accusation from I believe one player. Was he disgruntled? Were they tackling him and he called it "Sexual" in nature....I really can't glean anything from the reports online and of course, the 6 month law firm investigation doesn't seem to implicate Fitz. As for your point about the responsibility of leaders...I don't know it's as cut and dry. If in a 300 person organization a female employee says she was sexually harassed, the company investigates, I would imagine the harasser is complicit and loses his job and potentially has a lawsuit to deal with. Does the CEO automatically lose his/her job for operating a business with a culture of impropriety? Were multiple complaints about this made to FItz? Did he ignore them? This sort of "Coach should have known" stuff just sounds so familiar. Again, if the player was sexually assaulted, why not file charges against the players? And look, who does the buck really stop with? Should the president of the university be fired? It's HIS school. He should have had the systems in place to make sure this type of stuff doesn't happen on the football or field hockey teams. Remember, Isiaha Humphries made very similar claims against Franklin and players. I'd think we would really want to know the true details of the story before firing Franklin then.
 
Sandusky used the Second Mile to identify, groom and abuse children. One could argue the culture of that organization was child sexual abuse. he used PSU resources as props and opportunities to further his grooming and abusing activities. Paterno did not establish a culture of child sexual abuse on the part of his players or coaches. Certainly there could be a legitimate argument around what did he and others see and try not to see with Sandusky, But that is a different sort of accountability than the coach who manages the players on his team and sets the cultural values of the team. The NW players were doing this, and seems pretty out in the open. Somehow they got the message that this was sanctioned, allowable, maybe even encouraged behavior on that team. And if Fitz really did not know he had very poor management structure in place that assistant coaches and grad assistants and team "leaders" and the "leadership council" had to know and did not communicate it back to Fitz. So people who reported to Fitz had to know about this.

Look, it's a fair argument, you make a good case. I just don't see it that way. I just think there is too much unknown. This type of stuff goes on in locker rooms, maybe it shouldn't at all, but it does. Did it go too far in this case? Seems like it. Did players and coaches communicate to Fitz that it went too far? I don't know. Fitz certainly has a lot of players defending him at the moment(which doesn't prove anything admittedly).
 
Look, it's a fair argument, you make a good case. I just don't see it that way. I just think there is too much unknown. This type of stuff goes on in locker rooms, maybe it shouldn't at all, but it does. Did it go too far in this case? Seems like it. Did players and coaches communicate to Fitz that it went too far? I don't know. Fitz certainly has a lot of players defending him at the moment(which doesn't prove anything admittedly).
After a six month investigation put in place after the first whistleblower reported it, the university's investigator found no evidence of Fitz being told.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: okcpokefan12
If Fitz was clapping over a players head to tell the team to naked dry hump him later in the locker room then he deserves to be fired. The supposed white board documenting these hazing punishments is a smoking gun. It seems clear that the players must've denied everything and NW accepted it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PSUSignore
After a six month investigation put in place after the first whistleblower reported it, the university's investigator found no evidence of Fitz being told.

Yeah, look, it's a standard I wouldn't want to be held to. "Did you know of this" "NO" okay, we are going to hire a law firm to investigate for 6 months. Report comes back, "they can't prove you knew...but you should have known, you're fired."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obliviax
What pundits fail to repeatedly recognize, is that in situations like this, institutions act to protect the institutions, the truth is of little consequence.
This is all about NWs reputation. The school prez made the decision. One of the "elite institutions of higher learning" can't have its name thrown through the mud. I think Fitz is more guilty than most on this board but these days it takes very little to get canned when dealing with issues like this. He could have looked at a guy the wrong way, said guy reports it as racism and there you have it. Not saying it was just that in this case just making a point about it does not take much.
 
This is all about NWs reputation. The school prez made the decision. One of the "elite institutions of higher learning" can't have its name thrown through the mud. I think Fitz is more guilty than most on this board but these days it takes very little to get canned when dealing with issues like this. He could have looked at a guy the wrong way, said guy reports it as racism and there you have it. Not saying it was just that in this case just making a point about it does not take much.
Also known as "CYA".

Personally, I think "Fitz" is a target because he's had the reputation of a "good guy" coach. Somebody has a vendetta and the media loves it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bison13
Yeah there is some of that. I think there was a ton of that with Joe. The A hole media getting their jollies by seeing him go down.
Yep. Now the faculty is involved. This will come down to the president for us his fitz. If Fitz retains his reputation, the president will be fired. If the president can prove something then fitz will never coach again.

 
they had an investigation that showed Fitz had nothing to do with it.
There's a difference between (1) the investigation didn't find evidence that Fitz was aware vs. (2) the investigation showed that Fitz had nothing to do with it. The investigation summary showed the former, they didn't know if Fitz was aware of it but they couldn't prove he was. Regardless, as the head coach while this was happening his firing was inevitable. As we know, it's nearly impossible to prove point #2 because it would entail proving a negative. But there are multiple player reports of this, allegations of Fitz clapping next to players to indicate possible hazing targets, and the alleged whiteboard photo in the facilities would seemingly be clear evidence that this was happening in plain sight of many. Even the president's early statement walking back the 2 week suspension said he focused too much what what Fitz did know, and should have placed more emphasis on what Fitz "should have known." If the supposed whiteboard photo is legit and this has been going on for many years it's a pretty easy sell to say Fitz or someone on the coaching staff should have known this was going on.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bytir and tboyer
Sure, I'll play ball. First, we don't still know what "It" is. We have an accusation from I believe one player. Was he disgruntled? Were they tackling him and he called it "Sexual" in nature....I really can't glean anything from the reports online and of course, the 6 month law firm investigation doesn't seem to implicate Fitz. As for your point about the responsibility of leaders...I don't know it's as cut and dry. If in a 300 person organization a female employee says she was sexually harassed, the company investigates, I would imagine the harasser is complicit and loses his job and potentially has a lawsuit to deal with. Does the CEO automatically lose his/her job for operating a business with a culture of impropriety? Were multiple complaints about this made to FItz? Did he ignore them? This sort of "Coach should have known" stuff just sounds so familiar. Again, if the player was sexually assaulted, why not file charges against the players? And look, who does the buck really stop with? Should the president of the university be fired? It's HIS school. He should have had the systems in place to make sure this type of stuff doesn't happen on the football or field hockey teams. Remember, Isiaha Humphries made very similar claims against Franklin and players. I'd think we would really want to know the true details of the story before firing Franklin then.

Just because you don't have those details doesn't mean the school doesn't... They're a private institution so it'll be interesting to see what comes to light. Does every firing decision in the country need to get run by Ram2020? If so shoot Schill a request for the deetz and then you can weigh in.

Humphries case was thrown out with prejudice IIRC and there were no players that corroborated. Sounds like this was multiple players confirming details across multiple years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tboyer
There's a difference between (1) the investigation didn't find evidence that Fitz was aware vs. (2) the investigation showed that Fitz had nothing to do with it. The investigation summary showed the former, they didn't know if Fitz was aware of it but they couldn't prove he was. Regardless, as the head coach while this was happening his firing was inevitable. As we know, it's nearly impossible to prove point #2 because it would entail proving a negative. But there are multiple player reports of this, allegations of Fitz clapping next to players to indicate possible hazing targets, and the alleged whiteboard photo in the facilities would seemingly be clear evidence that this was happening in plain sight of many. Even the president's early statement walking back the 2 week suspension said he focused too much what what Fitz did know, and should have placed more emphasis on what Fitz "should have known." If the supposed whiteboard photo is legit and this has been going on for many years it's a pretty easy sell to say Fitz or someone on the coaching staff should have known this was going on.
You could never prove you aren’t aware. It is impossible
 
I really don't agree.

they had an investigation that showed Fitz had nothing to do with it. I understand the "should have known" bullshit but that isn't really possible. Players are adults and have their own lives. You can't follow them around and helicopter-parent them. I can't even get my daughter's grades unless she allows me to (since she's an independent adult even though I pay the bills). And how in the hell can you name the DC interim head coach if you blame Fitz? Makes zero sense whatsoever.

If you want to fire him for his record, so be it. NW will be the worst football program in the B1G for the next several years. Who would want to work for that Bozo that took a school icon and fired him even though he was 100% innocent?

I would fire him for his record; I think he was ridiculously overrated. NW under Randy Walker and in Fitz's first couple years was a dangerous team with a consistently pesky, hard-to-defend offense and an undermanned but spirited D. Now they're basically back to where they were before Gary Barnett. It will take time to rebuild but chances are better for them under a new coach I think (and it won't be the DC if the investigation really establishes the hazing was widespread and happening over many years).
 
This. The sanctions at PSU only happened because of the tacit approval - hell, invitation - by PSU leadership. If PSU wasn't willing to go along with it, we never would have experienced any penalties let alone anything that severe.

The sanctions made no sense of course but Emmert had the votes on the NCAA committee to give PSU the death penalty and he would have done it. And given the press firestorm it would have been very hard for PSU to go to court and fight it. Judges tend not to buck public opinion.

So I do think the BOT was having to pick from some really awful options. They chose to genuflect to Emmert and keep the Beav open and PSU would live to fight another day. Hard for me to say that was the wrong choice.
 
Yep. Now the faculty is involved. This will come down to the president for us his fitz. If Fitz retains his reputation, the president will be fired. If the president can prove something then fitz will never coach again.
Not true. DJ Durkin is making millions coaching at Texas A&M today. Fitz can retire very comfortably but if he wants to coach he'll be able to get back on the train in about 12 months. Memories are short.
 
Just because you don't have those details doesn't mean the school doesn't... They're a private institution so it'll be interesting to see what comes to light. Does every firing decision in the country need to get run by Ram2020? If so shoot Schill a request for the deetz and then you can weigh in.

Humphries case was thrown out with prejudice IIRC and there were no players that corroborated. Sounds like this was multiple players confirming details across multiple years.
Yes I agree, the swiftness of the NU president's about face on this from 2 weeks suspension to firing suggests they know some things that are pretty ugly that the rest of us don't know and they don't want us to know.
 
Yes I agree, the swiftness of the NU president's about face on this from 2 weeks suspension to firing suggests they know some things that are pretty bad that the rest of us don't know.
Methinks a couple former players or coaches came forward after the news broke.

So are they legitimate stories or people looking to cash in?🤷
 
Methinks a couple former players or coaches came forward after the news broke.

So are they legitimate stories or people looking to cash in?🤷
Fitz said there was nothing new outside of the six months investigation that caused punishment to change from two weeks to termination.
 
Just because you don't have those details doesn't mean the school doesn't... They're a private institution so it'll be interesting to see what comes to light. Does every firing decision in the country need to get run by Ram2020? If so shoot Schill a request for the deetz and then you can weigh in.

Humphries case was thrown out with prejudice IIRC and there were no players that corroborated. Sounds like this was multiple players confirming details across multiple years.
Yeah, I think people were opining whether Fitz should be canned based on the details known to the public. Of course if there are other details that the school is privy, that could change hearts and minds. No, they don't have to run it by me whether they fire him or not....neither does your company fortunately.

He'll certainly be suing the school, so hopefully it gets to court and all the details can be lay to bare. More likely, they'll settle out of court and sign NDAs.
 
You could never prove you aren’t aware. It is impossible
Exactly. That is why this sort of thing needs to come down to concrete evidence of him knowing (the whole "innocent until proven guilty" idea) otherwise a person's reputation and livelihood takes a hit even if they have done nothing wrong. I realize that private organizations are not beholden to "innocent until proven guilty" but it is the right standard to apply with serious allegations like this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: psu00
That is why this sort of thing needs to come down to concrete evidence of him knowing

Disagree. If the defense of "I didn't know" is an automatic get out of jail free card so to speak then everyone in leadership would implement some form of don't ask, don't tell to ensure nothing controversial ever makes it to them in order to avoid any personal liability. You'd incentivize turning a blind eye.

Not saying its the case but if there was a culture of "Don't tell Pat because he doesn't want to know" then Pat not knowing can't be a defense.
 
Disagree. If the defense of "I didn't know" is an automatic get out of jail free card so to speak then everyone in leadership would implement some form of don't ask, don't tell to ensure nothing controversial ever makes it to them in order to avoid any personal liability. You'd incentivize turning a blind eye.

Not saying its the case but if there was a culture of "Don't tell Pat because he doesn't want to know" then Pat not knowing can't be a defense.

Then you need to have some evidence of the leader specifically instructing subordinates to have free reign to do anything but not tell him/her. My point is that you can't expect someone to defend themselves by saying "prove you didn't know" - it is impossible to prove a negative. The burden has to be on the accusing party to prove some sort of misdeed having occurred on the part of the person suffering consequences.
 
  • Like
Reactions: psu00
Not true. DJ Durkin is making millions coaching at Texas A&M today. Fitz can retire very comfortably but if he wants to coach he'll be able to get back on the train in about 12 months. Memories are short.
Doubtful as a head guy although maybe he crawls back at tim buk tu state and eventually all the way back to a Power 5 program. I don't think he is a good enough coach sans any of this to make it back to a Power 5 job.
 
Then you need to have some evidence of the leader specifically instructing subordinates to have free reign to do anything but not tell him/her. My point is that you can't expect someone to defend themselves by saying "prove you didn't know" - it is impossible to prove a negative. The burden has to be on the accusing party to prove some sort of misdeed having occurred on the part of the person suffering consequences.
Lack of control in the program. He had no idea and totally unaware? Then he is guilty of clueless leadership, head in the sand while bad things are going on in your program. He knew? Well, we all know that is worse. Either way, he looks God awful in all of this unless it comes out that all the accusers are lying and nothing happened except making freshman carry the equipment or something like that.
 
Last edited:
Lack of control in the program. He had no idea and totally unaware? Then he is guilty of clueless leadership, head in the sand while bad things are going on in your program. He knew? Well, we all know tha is worse. Either way, he looks God awful in all of this unless it comes out that all the accusers are lying and nothing happened except making freshman carry the equipment or something like that.
Also, this is not like a CEO of a multi billion dollar company and sexual harassment was found in the manufacturing site 1,000 miles from HQ so blame and fire the CEO. These football programs are tight knit, the coach oversees the football program and all that goes on with it. These coaches get paid way too much and deserve the blame when things like this go down. Hold him accountable unless all of it is proven false. I highly doubt that is a remote possibility as they already canned him, they are not that dumb, they have him on some things for sure.
 
Then you need to have some evidence of the leader specifically instructing subordinates to have free reign to do anything but not tell him/her. My point is that you can't expect someone to defend themselves by saying "prove you didn't know" - it is impossible to prove a negative. The burden has to be on the accusing party to prove some sort of misdeed having occurred on the part of the person suffering consequences.

You don't know how his contract was written so you don't know what NW needs or doesn't need...


I'd imagine there's a section pertaining to fostering a safe environment that he clearly failed to meet. Can't get Pats contract since NW is private but Ryan Day's is available. https://media.bizj.us/view/img/11501416/ryandaycontract-executed5-31-19-151677.pdf

Assuming similar boilerplate language, the issue would be section 5.1 Q. Termination for Cause.

"Failure by Coach to engage in (and/or failure to take steps to assure that every person under Coach's direct supervision is engaging in) safe and responsible treatment of student-athletes on the Team or failure to avoid behavior that could jeopardize a student-athlete's health, safety, welfare or that could otherwise cause harm or risk causing harm to a student-athlete."

I don't think anyone here would argue Pat met this criteria. If any staff member was aware and allowed it to continue it wouldn't matter what Pat knew.
 
Last edited:
You don't know how his contract was written so you don't know what NW needs or doesn't need...


I'd imagine there's a section pertaining to fostering a safe environment that he clearly failed to meet. Can't get Pats contract since NW is private but Ryan Day's is available. https://media.bizj.us/view/img/11501416/ryandaycontract-executed5-31-19-151677.pdf

Assuming similar boilerplate language, the issue would be section 5.1 Q. Termination for Cause.

"Failure by Coach to engage in (and/or failure to take steps to assure that every person under coach's direct supervision is engaging in) safe and responsible treatment of student-athletes on the Team or failure to avoid behavior that could jeopardize a student-athlete's health, safety, welfare or that could otherwise cause harm or risk causing harm to a student-athlete."

I don't think anyone here would argue Pat met this criteria.
Any head coach should have regular, annual team meetings about how harmful hazing is and how it won’t be tolerated. And then enforce such rules.

Having records of such meetings would help his defense. Failure to have such records puts him in serious jeopardy.
 
Any head coach should have regular, annual team meetings about how harmful hazing is and how it won’t be tolerated. And then enforce such rules.

Having records of such meetings would help his defense. Failure to have such records puts him in serious jeopardy.

Yup documentation is key.

End of the day it doesn't really matter if he didn't know. What matters is how his contract was written and if he can prove he fulfilled those obligations as per the agreement. NW obviously feels he didn't.
 
Former player just now on CNN With Jake Tapper: "Forced to shave the words Cinco de mayo in his scalp, both offensive and defensive coordinators under Fitz not only knew but were there at the time".

UT oh.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT