ADVERTISEMENT

"Paterno, as has been well-documented, called all the shots in Happy Valley." -Stewart Mandel

Should an Engineering graduate MAJOR PROFESS0R be responsible for disciplining the student? Should we have varying degrees of discipline?

From what I recall, that was Vicky's point. Now, she PILED ON during the scandal and she handled her disagreements with Paterno poorly. But, I think there should be UNIVERSAL discipline regardless. And, from what I recall, her beef was that there wasnt.

You recall incorrectly. Vicky wanted the ability to summarily punish athletes without them going through the disciplinary process established for ALL Penn State students.
 
First, Mandels quote about "all the shots" is in reference to FOOTBALL. Your original title of your post implies that the article is saying all the shots UNIVERSITY wide. Which I didn't take Mandela comments as such.

That being said, I don't believe there werect any times Paterno was OVER RULED: from scheduling, to discipline, to staff hiring, to uniforms, etc.

Again, I'm not saying Paterno did a bad thing with that POWER. But, I agree he HAD that power. He did, "call the shots." And, his face-offs with Vicky are an example. Again, I think the disagreements could have been handled better. But, who won those battles?

Is that what you're offering as evidence of the president and AD being Paterno's puppets?

And as a self-proclaimed "man of science", I expect you to know how this science thing works.
 
You have it exactly backwards. What Vicky wanted was the ability to discipline athletes OUTSIDE the procedures set for all other students.
Well, then I do have it backwards. I thought her beef was that football players, specif8cally, we're being disciplined outside the procedures.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zenophile
100s, no 1,000s of incidents where JoePa wanted X, and was told that the AD or the President was going with Y. Sometimes he accepted the instructions, and sometimes he tried to get his way. Even in the 2nd situation, he rarely "won." I do know about a lot of the incidents, but have not been given permission to discuss them (except for things like the baseball stadium, which are public knowledge). I don't think most of this info will come out until the C/S/S situation gets resolved, as C & S have direct knowledge of the incidents but are not discussing anything in public.

Awesome --- so the answer is "I know, but I can't tell you. But trust me."

Shoot, one would think that after 40+ years as head football coach, we might be able to provide at least one example (besides that off-quoted baseball field) of such.

But I guess not. Nobody has "permission to discuss them."

I guess you don't have "permission to discuss them", but I do wonder why on Earth would any of these incidents come out during the C/S/S trials? What relevance could they have with the C/S/S trial? It seems those trials are primarily about whether C/S/S failed to report, endangered children, or obstructed justice.
 
Well, then I do have it backwards. I thought her beef was that football players, specif8cally, we're being disciplined outside the procedures.

Her beef was that she wanted to be able to summarily suspend football players for getting in trouble before those players had even gone through Penn State's disciplinary process that applies to ALL students.
 
Awesome --- so the answer is "I know, but I can't tell you. But trust me."

Shoot, one would think that after 40+ years as head football coach, we might be able to provide at least one example (besides that off-quoted baseball field) of such.

But I guess not. Nobody has "permission to discuss them."

I guess you don't have "permission to discuss them", but I do wonder why on Earth would any of these incidents come out during the C/S/S trials? What relevance could they have with the C/S/S trial? It seems those trials are primarily about whether C/S/S failed to report, endangered children, or obstructed justice.

As I mentioned earlier....

There is documentary evidence that Paterno did not want Sandusky bringing minors into Lasch building. Someone clearly overruled him. Interestingly, Freeh didn't tell us who.
 
Awesome --- so the answer is "I know, but I can't tell you. But trust me."

Shoot, one would think that after 40+ years as head football coach, we might be able to provide at least one example (besides that off-quoted baseball field) of such.

But I guess not. Nobody has "permission to discuss them."

I guess you don't have "permission to discuss them", but I do wonder why on Earth would any of these incidents come out during the C/S/S trials? What relevance could they have with the C/S/S trial? It seems those trials are primarily about whether C/S/S failed to report, endangered children, or obstructed justice.


How many more do you want? Quit now.
 
As I mentioned earlier....

There is documentary evidence that Paterno did not want Sandusky bringing minors into Lasch building. Someone clearly overruled him. Interestingly, Freeh didn't tell us who.

What is this documentary evidence?

If it exists, why is this "documentary evidence" being broadcast more loudly (by Paterno's family)?
 
What is this documentary evidence?

If it exists, why is this "documentary evidence" being broadcast more loudly (by Paterno's family)?


There is a note Joe made regarding Sandusky, and the liability of allowing children to use equipment. Where have you been, yo yo?
 
I don't necessarily disagree. Can someone here share evidence where the AD and/or President stood up to JoePa and/or over ruled what Paterno wanted to do?

It's not like he wrote "it's well documented Paterno covered up for a pedophile" for example. That would be something to be outraged about. But, really, Paterno had too much influence on campus.
How could they stand up to Joe? What did Joe do that they should stand up to? He said that he wanted his players to be student athletes - go to class and get a degree. He only stood up when they tried to get him to retire. This is a lot different than standing up for some negative issue. I have heard this argument that Joe ran the University. This is BS! Were his donations to the Paterno Library some way to control the University?
I am tired of people saying that Joe was God and all powerful!
 
  • Like
Reactions: psualt
I dislike Vicky as much as everyone else here. And although I disagree with how she handled her disagreements, she had a point: discipline shouldn't favor one student over another.

Actually, that was Joe's point. Vicky was the exact opposite.
 
I agree 100%. That's why I don't take exception to what was said regarding Paterno.

Why is it that NO ONE can say anything negative? So what. Paterno had a HUGE amount of influence (that equated with certain power). So what. Tell me something we don't already know. But, why be outraged about it?

His comment about the AD and President being his "puppet" was a poor choice of word. But, I get what he was saying.

I don't think stewie was going for the same reference as you.
 
Where are the quotes where JoePa was against the Big Ten Network? I am not saying that is not true, but this is certainly the first time I've heard of that.

Besides --- the Big Ten Network influenced all Penn State sports, not solely football. If JoePa thought HE should be the one to call the shots on PSU's involvement with the Big Ten Network, he was horribly incorrect. Also incorrect is anyone who thinks JoePa should have made that decision (instead of Spanier).

Some.
 
I read the article in the context of JVP having control over the football decisions and the ability to make Jay HC. I guess you could stretch it to mean more. Reality is JVP had significant power and influence. I don't equate that to the JS situation, however.

I wonder how many who now claim JVP's lack of power were saying that prior to Nov 2011.
 
Certain people here need to be put out of their misery, because they have miserable unhappy lonely lives.

No. He's good entertainment on these type of discussions and he brings very interesting articles to the board that I otherwise would miss. If you don't like him just put him on ignore...but you'll miss the science related stuff he posts.
 
I thought you said you read the Freeh report.

I've read it ..... this is Exhibit 2G you're referring to, correct?

The one where JoePa says that 2nd Mile kids aren't allowed to come into Lasch Building.

But Sandusky bringing in other kids (Joe's exact words are "Is this for personal use, or 2nd Mile kids. No to 2nd Mile kids. Liability problems) ----- evidently that is NOT a problem.

You really want to refer to exhibit 2G, which may be one of the more damning exhibits in the Report as regards JoePa?
 
I've read it ..... this is Exhibit 2G you're referring to, correct?

The one where JoePa says that 2nd Mile kids aren't allowed to come into Lasch Building.

But Sandusky bringing in other kids (Joe's exact words are "Is this for personal use, or 2nd Mile kids. No to 2nd Mile kids. Liability problems) ----- evidently that is NOT a problem.

You really want to refer to exhibit 2G, which may be one of the more damning exhibits in the Report as regards JoePa?
That's one way to read it. However, the more accurate interpretation is this for Jerry's individual use or for TSM.
 
Thats why I am not a Humanist!

Are you one of those people that want the Thomas Jefferson Memorial removed b/c he owned slaves? The only entity that is "perfect", then, in your mind is your imaginary God?

I'll place my (ahem) faith in humanity. Thanks.
 
I've read it ..... this is Exhibit 2G you're referring to, correct?

The one where JoePa says that 2nd Mile kids aren't allowed to come into Lasch Building.

But Sandusky bringing in other kids (Joe's exact words are "Is this for personal use, or 2nd Mile kids. No to 2nd Mile kids. Liability problems) ----- evidently that is NOT a problem.

You really want to refer to exhibit 2G, which may be one of the more damning exhibits in the Report as regards JoePa?

"one of the more damning exhibits.."

Are you freaking kidding me? Sounds like you interpreted that note with your freeh goggles on...good grief. I guess it never crossed your mind that when Joe (or anyone else in the fb program for that matter) saw JS with kids he assumed they were TSM kids. Joe didn't want kids period around the program, using facilities, etc..he viewed it as a distraction and liability issue. It's one of the things he clashed with JS about frequently when JS was still on his staff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ralpieE
No. He's good entertainment on these type of discussions and he brings very interesting articles to the board that I otherwise would miss. If you don't like him just put him on ignore...but you'll miss the science related stuff he posts.
If someone here was interested in his science posts, they can check out cnn.com every once in awhile.
 
"one of the more damning exhibits.."

Are you freaking kidding me? Sounds like you interpreted that note with your freeh goggles on...good grief. I guess it never crossed your mind that when Joe (or anyone else in the fb program for that matter) saw JS with kids he assumed they were TSM kids. Joe didn't want kids period around the program, using facilities, etc..he viewed it as a distraction and liability issue. It's one of the things he clashed with JS about frequently when JS was still on his staff.


Yes, he was backed into a corner, by his own doing, so he had to spin. It failed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206
I read the article in the context of JVP having control over the football decisions and the ability to make Jay HC. I guess you could stretch it to mean more. Reality is JVP had significant power and influence. I don't equate that to the JS situation, however.

I wonder how many who now claim JVP's lack of power were saying that prior to Nov 2011.

Anyone really think Joe would press the admin for Jay to be HC? There would be a fan revolt in the highest mangitude. The admin knew and so dis Joe. Sure, he could recommend and plead Jays case, but it was NEVER going to happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ralpieE
Anyone really think Joe would press the admin for Jay to be HC? There would be a fan revolt in the highest mangitude. The admin knew and so dis Joe. Sure, he could recommend and plead Jays case, but it was NEVER going to happen.

There is absolutely no evidence that Joe ever had any intention of pushing Jay as head coach. That's just delusional garbage from insane JoePa haters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ralpieE
I don't think most of this info will come out until the C/S/S situation gets resolved, as C & S have direct knowledge of the incidents but are not discussing anything in public.

I guess you don't have "permission to discuss them", but I do wonder why on Earth would any of these incidents come out during the C/S/S trials? What relevance could they have with the C/S/S trial? It seems those trials are primarily about whether C/S/S failed to report, endangered children, or obstructed justice.

I bolded a portion of what I posted, since based on your response it appears you did not comprehend it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jim cummings
I've read it ..... this is Exhibit 2G you're referring to, correct?

The one where JoePa says that 2nd Mile kids aren't allowed to come into Lasch Building.

But Sandusky bringing in other kids (Joe's exact words are "Is this for personal use, or 2nd Mile kids. No to 2nd Mile kids. Liability problems) ----- evidently that is NOT a problem.

You really want to refer to exhibit 2G, which may be one of the more damning exhibits in the Report as regards JoePa?
Oh please. His use of the word liability there is misunderstood by you and many others. Are you really that dumb?
 
I bolded a portion of what I posted, since based on your response it appears you did not comprehend it.

Fair enough.

For the record, here is where we stand after 79 posts in this thread ..... ZERO examples (outside of the infamous exhibit 2G) over Joe Paterno's years as PSU head football coach where he was overruled by our AD or President on a football-related issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peter_North
Fair enough.

For the record, here is where we stand after 79 posts in this thread ..... ZERO examples (outside of the infamous exhibit 2G) over Joe Paterno's years as PSU head football coach where he was overruled by our AD or President on a football-related issue.


Much it-I try to be fair-I try to be tolerant-but at the end of the day it just comes down to this-you need help man!
You are just so biased and jaded it clouds your perception of everything.

I know I'm not being specific to this post so I apologize for that- just a general observation dude

Peace be with you ✌
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT