ADVERTISEMENT

Football Penn State Set To Name Beaver Stadium Field - West Shore Home Field

My point is that there is a very good chance Penn State never sees that $50 million and even if it does, a fair chance the last installment does not arrive to Penn State until 2085.
  • Based on the "gift" perimeters, $10 million comes within the first 10 years. That could mean $1 million a year for next 10 years, $5 million in 5 years and another $5 million at the 10 year mark, or possibly all $10 million coming at the 10 year mark.
  • Then, according to the gift agreement, the "donor" has the next 50 years to give the remaining $40 million. Who's to say how that $40 million will be paid over that 50 years.
  • The naming agreement is for 15 years. So the donor fulfills the first part and ensures $10 million by the 10th year, he has 50 more years to "give" the next $40 million so at the 15 year mark when "West Shore Home" is no longer the name, what incentive does the donor have to complete the gift?
It happens more than you think where a donor does not fulfill the gift agreement. My wife and I both work in higher ed though she works on the advancement/development side and she's never seen a gift agreement structured this way. In her words, "I don't know a development officer who would agree to those terms."

Kraft is booking all $50 million as a gift towards the stadium which is fine. Most universities will announce a gift and book the full amount towards that year's fundraising goal. That's standard practice but the length of time to pay off what isn't a lot of money when you consider the length of time. What happens if West Shore Homes goes under in 7 years? Yes, the CEO of West Shore Homes is a PSU alum but the gift is not from him but from West Shore Homes.

As for the folks who are getting upset about Paterno not being named, sorry but get over it. Michael Mauti put it best--want to honor him? Go win a national championship. His name on or off the field doesn't take away what he's done for the school and program. I'm willing to bet having a library named after him vs the field is the way he would want it.
Fair enough. I suspect, with no evidence, that the "gift" is so the "donor" can deduct it as a charitable contribution and not just a business expense for whatever reason.
 
It's actually worse than that. $10 million is due in the first 10 years and the remaining $40 million is to be paid over the next 50 years!

Kraft was trying to have it both ways--touting it as the largest gift to the athletic department and a sponsorship. In both cases, it's an awful deal. No advancement/development unit in higher education would accept those conditions for a gift. Fairly likely, they never see the full $50 million.
If that is true, then you're probably correct that PSU will never see the whole $50 million. Sounds like a very bad deal.
 
My point is that there is a very good chance Penn State never sees that $50 million and even if it does, a fair chance the last installment does not arrive to Penn State until 2085.
  • Based on the "gift" perimeters, $10 million comes within the first 10 years. That could mean $1 million a year for next 10 years, $5 million in 5 years and another $5 million at the 10 year mark, or possibly all $10 million coming at the 10 year mark.
  • Then, according to the gift agreement, the "donor" has the next 50 years to give the remaining $40 million. Who's to say how that $40 million will be paid over that 50 years.
  • The naming agreement is for 15 years. So the donor fulfills the first part and ensures $10 million by the 10th year, he has 50 more years to "give" the next $40 million so at the 15 year mark when "West Shore Home" is no longer the name, what incentive does the donor have to complete the gift?
It happens more than you think where a donor does not fulfill the gift agreement. My wife and I both work in higher ed though she works on the advancement/development side and she's never seen a gift agreement structured this way. In her words, "I don't know a development officer who would agree to those terms."

Kraft is booking all $50 million as a gift towards the stadium which is fine. Most universities will announce a gift and book the full amount towards that year's fundraising goal. That's standard practice but the length of time to pay off what isn't a lot of money when you consider the length of time. What happens if West Shore Homes goes under in 7 years? Yes, the CEO of West Shore Homes is a PSU alum but the gift is not from him but from West Shore Homes.

As for the folks who are getting upset about Paterno not being named, sorry but get over it. Michael Mauti put it best--want to honor him? Go win a national championship. His name on or off the field doesn't take away what he's done for the school and program. I'm willing to bet having a library named after him vs the field is the way he would want it.
Wow, that’s crazy! The exact BS 💩 that Barry Fenchak goes crazy about.💥💥
 
  • Like
Reactions: RickinDayton
You act as if it was an either or scenario. Joe died 13 years ago and when exactly was “Paterno Field” going to come to fruition. Hint, it wasn’t.

Didn’t Joe himself resist such plans?
Honoring Joe is not my point. The 'one' making a public relations gift is perhaps claiming his name and position - outside of specific University service or employ - is more appropriate than an honor bestowed on any former loyalty to Penn State.

Is it possible that money in any fashion or time payment agreement was the only possible answer. And if so, what did PSU actually give away? From continuing posts - is this a 'really good deal' ?
 
Honoring Joe is not my point. The 'one' making a public relations gift is perhaps claiming his name and position - outside of specific University service or employ - is more appropriate than an honor bestowed on any former loyalty to Penn State.

Is it possible that money in any fashion or time payment agreement was the only possible answer. And if so, what did PSU actually give away? From continuing posts - is this a 'really good deal' ?
How many buildings at PSU are named after donors that attended but did not work for PSU? This is basically the same except it’s of much higher profile and named after a corporation, and the price tag is adjusted.

Even my local high school has logos of a health system plastered all over the field as they put up some money for the artificial surface.
 
Last edited:
How many buildings at PSU are named after donors that attended but did not work for PSU? This is basically the same except it’s of much higher profile and name after a corporation.

Even my local high school had logos of a health system plastered all over the field as they put up some money.
This has gotten so bad with NHL games that company names now are superimposed on the ice for the TV broadcasts only; if you're at the game, there not painted on the ice. It's like looking at a race car driver's uniform when you watch the games.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: The Spin Meister
If that is true, then you're probably correct that PSU will never see the whole $50 million. Sounds like a very bad deal.
Honoring Joe is not my point. The 'one' making a public relations gift is perhaps claiming his name and position - outside of specific University service or employ - is more appropriate than an honor bestowed on any former loyalty to Penn State.

Is it possible that money in any fashion or time payment agreement was the only possible answer. And if so, what did PSU actually give away? From continuing posts - is this a 'really good deal' ?
Pitt Stadium at Paterno Field.
 
This has gotten so bad with NHL games that company names now are superimposed on the ice for the TV broadcasts only; if you're at the game, there not painted on the ice. It's like looking at a race car driver's uniform when you watch the games.
MLB just started logos on uniforms. I agree it’s all silly and I’d prefer it’s not there but it doesn’t interfere with my enjoyment of sports.

Look at MLB games from when America was “pure” going back to the 50’s. Logo’s and signs all over the outfield wall and scoreboard.
 
MLB just started logos on uniforms. I agree it’s all silly and I’d prefer it’s not there but it doesn’t interfere with my enjoyment of sports.

Look at MLB games from when America was “pure” going back to the 50’s. Logo’s and signs all over the outfield wall and scoreboard.
There's no doubt in my mind that the PSU uniforms, as well as most other schools, soon will have an advertisement on them. I follow soccer, and this has been going on for decades in that sport, so I'm used to it. If you notice on the coccer uniforms, the advertisement is much larger than the team crest.
 
MLB just started logos on uniforms. I agree it’s all silly and I’d prefer it’s not there but it doesn’t interfere with my enjoyment of sports.

Look at MLB games from when America was “pure” going back to the 50’s. Logo’s and signs all over the outfield wall and scoreboard.
I don’t care if the uniforms end up looking like NASCAR. Just spare us the silly wait-until-the-camera-is-on-before-drinking-the-sponsor’s-beversge crap.

Or thanking some company or sponsor in every interview.
 
  • Like
Reactions: diontechristmas
WSH doesn’t care what you call it but it will be referenced always in print and on the broadcast but the logo will be seen on the field for pretty much the whole game 7-8 times a year. $475k for that per game seems cheap.
They won't mention the field name much at all in broadcasts. Their value comes from their name and logo being on the field.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ian
They won't mention the field name much at all in broadcasts. Their value comes from their name and logo being on the field.
I disagree. Steve Jones will be required to mention the field name several times each game if he mentions Beaver Stadium. Mark it down. Additionally, any official PSU news releases mentioning the stadium will have to mention the field name. This is how these deals work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Spin Meister
I disagree. Steve Jones will be required to mention the field name several times each game if he mentions Beaver Stadium. Mark it down. Additionally, any official PSU news releases mentioning the stadium will have to mention the field name. This is how these deals work.
In the old days it would have been "that was the 'West Shore Home Field' fourth and five running play to end any chance of Penn State winning the game against Ohio State".
 
This all has me wondering if anyone has researched whether these sponsorships are actually worth it for the sponsor. I mean obviously they think that having their name seen on the field/read off by announcers is great advertising, but how many people will actually buy a product based on something like this? And then throw in the resentment factor, I just don’t see it as a very good investment.
 
This all has me wondering if anyone has researched whether these sponsorships are actually worth it for the sponsor. I mean obviously they think that having their name seen on the field/read off by announcers is great advertising, but how many people will actually buy a product based on something like this? And then throw in the resentment factor, I just don’t see it as a very good investment.
It’s studied a ton. Corporations don’t spend that kinda payout without data and science behind it. Naming a major NFL Stadium can generate hundreds of millions of impressions by broadcasts, online sports, AP/Reuters reports, even betting lines.


 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 94LionsFan
It’s studied a ton. Corporations don’t spend that kinda layout with data and science behind it. Naming a major NFL Stadium can generate hundreds of millions of impressions by broadcasts, online sports, AP/Reuters reports, even betting lines.


Analyzing stadium naming rights involves understanding the value and effectiveness of these sponsorships, considering factors like brand awareness, fan engagement, and the potential for financial gain for both clubs and sponsors.

Understanding Stadium Naming Rights:
  • Financial Benefits:
    Stadium naming rights can generate significant revenue for teams, helping offset costs related to stadium construction, operations, and player salaries.

  • Brand Exposure:
    Sponsors gain valuable brand exposure, with the name of their company prominently displayed on the stadium, potentially reaching a large and engaged audience.

  • Local Focus:
    The impact of stadium naming rights is largely local, making it crucial for brands to target their messaging and efforts within the stadium's region.

  • Long-Term Agreements:
    Naming rights agreements are often long-term, providing a consistent source of revenue for the team and a lasting presence for the sponsor.

  • Fan Reaction:
    Fan acceptance and resistance to naming rights can vary depending on factors like the sponsor's local connection, prior involvement with the team, and the impact of the investment.

  • Impact on Brand Perception:
    Stadium naming rights can positively impact brand perception, with fans potentially viewing sponsors favorably for their support of the team and the local community.

  • Measurable Outcomes:
    Studies on NFL stadium naming rights have found that they drive brand awareness, positive brand perception and increased consumer engagement, with a high percentage of fans able to correctly identify the stadium sponsor.
 
I disagree. Steve Jones will be required to mention the field name several times each game if he mentions Beaver Stadium. Mark it down. Additionally, any official PSU news releases mentioning the stadium will have to mention the field name. This is how these deals work.
How often does he actually say "Beaver Stadium" now? I don't think that often. Maybe they force him to say it which may be what you are saying.
 
This all has me wondering if anyone has researched whether these sponsorships are actually worth it for the sponsor. I mean obviously they think that having their name seen on the field/read off by announcers is great advertising, but how many people will actually buy a product based on something like this? And then throw in the resentment factor, I just don’t see it as a very good investment.
Caveat Emptor - let the buyer beware.....
 
It's actually worse than that. $10 million is due in the first 10 years and the remaining $40 million is to be paid over the next 50 years!

Kraft was trying to have it both ways--touting it as the largest gift to the athletic department and a sponsorship. In both cases, it's an awful deal. No advancement/development unit in higher education would accept those conditions for a gift. Fairly likely, they never see the full $50 million.
This is not accurate. It's $50 million over 15 years. Kraft originally misspoke.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT