I love the sport. I do not follow the thought process that says we need 10 point offensive takedowns and only 3 points for a defensive takedown or anything along those lines.Just curious after reading 117 posts...is college wrestling really in need of major rule changes? Current rules apply to all, so the playing field is level, imo.
Tweaking to add excitement as the sport tries to grow seems reasonable to me. Change for change sake is insanity, and modifying rules where no problem exists is a waste.
I would like to see championship weigh-ins at nationals happen sometime after consolation and placement matches.
There are also situations that I would like to see designated as stalling, since they are stalling.
Just several examples, continuously retreating without attacking. The White kid against Joesph should have been DQed.
Neutral wrestling and as they begin to pass each other's ankles back and forth, if one discontinues to attempt to improve stall him. If they both stop stalemate it. If a continuation is going to put a kid in jeopardy PD it.
Anytime a top or bottom wrestler discontinues to attempt to improve position stall him.
Riding hips is not improving. Riding with legs and not digging to work towards a fall is stalling. Being ridden with legs and tucking arms, and placing belly and head on mat is bottom stalling.
Just a few things that drive me nuts.