↑
Absolutely. It's long, but interesting.
https://bwi.forums.rivals.com/threa...-reversal-global-warming.166533/#post-2637911
I reply to SmithLion
I read it a few times and basically understand it. Without making a big deal about it, here is my position;
1) We can't possibly do any significant on GW without greatly hurting our economy. I don't believe that solar and/or wind can possibly supply all our energy needs. FWIW, a long time ago I was a huge supporter of ethanol. I was seriously wrong. For Dems to continue down this path is to continue to lose elections.
2) I don't discount the possibility that GW is a cyclical affair on the scale of something like peaks and troughs every 50,000 years which I believe is T.J.'s position.
Catch50, Yesterday at 8:14 PM
Absolutely. It's long, but interesting.
https://bwi.forums.rivals.com/threa...-reversal-global-warming.166533/#post-2637911
I reply to SmithLion
I read it a few times and basically understand it. Without making a big deal about it, here is my position;
1) We can't possibly do any significant on GW without greatly hurting our economy. I don't believe that solar and/or wind can possibly supply all our energy needs. FWIW, a long time ago I was a huge supporter of ethanol. I was seriously wrong. For Dems to continue down this path is to continue to lose elections.
2) I don't discount the possibility that GW is a cyclical affair on the scale of something like peaks and troughs every 50,000 years which I believe is T.J.'s position.
Catch50, Yesterday at 8:14 PM
