Did the NCAA ever comment on either (or both) of those 1970's allegations?
Neither was in the Freeh report. Emmert and the NCAA took the Freeh as Gospel and used it as (ahem) proof to lay down those Draconian penalties.
So, why didnt Emmert bring MORE sanctions after those two allegations were made public? I find it odd that no one from the NCAA commented. Or did they?
Why would they ignore those allegations and take Freeh's (ahem) opinions as Gospel?
Neither was in the Freeh report. Emmert and the NCAA took the Freeh as Gospel and used it as (ahem) proof to lay down those Draconian penalties.
So, why didnt Emmert bring MORE sanctions after those two allegations were made public? I find it odd that no one from the NCAA commented. Or did they?
Why would they ignore those allegations and take Freeh's (ahem) opinions as Gospel?