Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If Florida isn't named in the lawsuit why would it be a reason to get rid of him?Interesting the suit is against coach Napier, a departed administrator who made promises and the "money" man, NOT the University of Florida. Florida has not been happy with Napier's performance, and I see this as an excuse to get rid of Napier without paying off his contract.
Looking to get rid of Napier without paying termination fee, local reports school is unhappy with performance (11 - 13). Negative publicity for University, chance to hire and pay big time coach, Napier came from smaller school. Saw report Day linked to Florida.If Florida isn't named in the lawsuit why would it be a reason to get rid of him?
Not saying you're wrong but not following the logic here. If anything, wouldn't Florida being included be a reason to get rid of him as his actions jeopardized them?
I doubt this gets them out of paying the contract/buyout if he's fired but maybe--should be interestingLooking to get rid of Napier without paying termination fee, local reports school is unhappy with performance (11 - 13). Negative publicity for University, chance to hire and pay big time coach, Napier came from smaller school. Saw report Day linked to Florida.