I think the people that you think know the most about this situation merely know the greatest amount of BS tin foil hat stuff and ignore facts.
Ray Blehar....MM caught in lie?
- Thread starter marshall23
- Start date
The public once thought the earth was flat, because they didn't know any better. You are essentially a flat earther.
You have a very tenuous grasp on what facts are in general, let alone the facts of this case.
You think that a jury verdict makes something a fact.
You think that someone making accusations makes it a fact.
You think that non one could possibly lie about being abused, even when millions of dollars are waved in their faces.
You take data and interpret in a way that no one without an anti-PSU agenda could possibly interpret it.
Even if that was the case, a reader might say "oh, that's awful. What did he do?" "Oh, a naked bear hug in the shower after a work out is unacceptable. What a creep! I've certainly heard of much, much worse."
And you think that a serial pedo would not sexually assault a boy he was alone with in the shower. LOL.
Why would I give two sharts about what anyone on the national board of rivals thinks?
Wrong. It's a bunch of football crazed people with incentive to hate PSU. Are you ever right about anything?
I don't know about the being paid part. I just know that jive is an ignorant, stupid idiot.
That you for illustrating your tenuous grasp of logic and fact.
You say he is a "serial pedo" why? Because he was convicted of being one. And therefore he must anally rape any boy he is alone with? Wow. That starts with circular logic and ends with quite the logic jump.
Not to mention that the headline came out before he was convicted of anything. So by lying in the GJP, the OAG insured that he could not possibly get a fair trial because they poisoned the jury pool from day one, AND when their star witness objected, they told him to shut up.
No, the public is literally everyone.
The rivals main board is a very small subset of the public, largely populated, I suspect, by fanatics who hated Joe prior to 2011.
If you truely think that the public would not be nearly as upset with a sexual assault, you have zero logic.
Do you believe any sane Penn Stater's want to associate with a delusional nut like you?
Those like you who can't see the problem with a pedophile showering alone with a young boy
late at night have a total lack of common sense.
To be right on any topic, all one has to do is see your opinion and go with the opposite.
Oh, hey, it's the other half of the "I only show up when something happens that hurts the current narrative." Welcome OL.
You are completely misrepresenting my argument. My argument is that public perception of a sexual assault which does not involve an overt sex act (e.g anal sex) would be FAR different than falsely mentioning anal sex.
If you cannot agree with that point, I don't think you have a very firm grasp of how most people view sex crimes.
I'm guessing there are quite a few people who agree with me.
Not that this is a perfect metric, but I would be happy to put my ratio of posts to likes up against yours (or any of your amigos) any day.
If you liked Joe before 2011 and hate Joe know, you are ignorant.
I think most people view pedos as deviant POS. Doesn’t what degree of pedo that is.
Of course, this totally ignores the fact that the public also knows that Jerry performed oral and anal sex with other victims.
Guarantee it never, ever makes a main stream media outlet...wanna wager? it would screw up the media's narrative..
People tend to not love me others who hear about a child being sexually assaulted and don’t take that information to police. The hate them even more when they know that person has watched the pedo be free for a decade following the incident and never once show any concern after initially kicking the can down the curb.
When you start calling out pnny and franco in the same manner or those obsessed that share your opinion...I might consider your opinion as being objective, but it sure doesn't seem to be. Basically people here want to mute him because he doesn't share a loud minorities opinion on this site...it's pretty damn clear.
BTW, he does post on football related subjects, but not as much on this site as this site is more of an off topic site to be honest. It has turned into a Jerry/OT board with the Judge doing the heavy lifting on recruting. Like I said when you call out others who post just as much but on the opposite side of the spectrum, let me know. Start with pnny,,,,kidding there as nobody gives a flying f--k what that nut says anyway.
you have, in prior posts, surrendered that Joe followed policy and did the right thing. It is really undeniable. Joe didn't see or hear anything so could only report it up to the guy responsible for the facility (Curley) and the guy responsible for campus police (Schultz). He also followed up with MM. These are all facts.
So why are you still hounding Paterno? You are just a trouble maker. I'd put JVP WAAAAaaay down the list:
- JS for being sick
- TSM, for not managing the charity & JS effectively
- MM, for not intervening, changing his story, and not calling the police
- Schultz, for not mounting a thorough investigation
- Curley for not intervening on Schultz to do his duty
- Dad
- Dranov (tie with Dad) for suggesting they go to a football coach instead of taking action
- Spanier, for not asking more questions
Two points:
1) You (and most people actually) misuse the word pedophile. It is not necessary to touch children to be a pedophile. The word you really want is pederast. But I guess that doesn't abbreviate as nicely (pede vs pedo), so sure keep illustrating your lack of command of the English language.
2) When the false GJP (and subsequent media reporting) came out, Sandusky had not been convicted of anything, therefore in the context of this argument, the public DID NOT know he had oral and anal sex with other victims.
Joe knew but he allowed his grandchildren to play at Sandusky's place?
C&S knew but they allowed JS to continue to come on campus and use the facilities?
How does this make sense? Or does it make more sense that they knew that JS had boundary issues?
LOL! - There's my crazy, drunk uncle pnnylion. Don't ever change, Bro!
Yes, Joe knew and he seemingly didn’t care enough to take it any further than he did.
He used it correctly. Most people do view pedophiles as POS. And one does not have to act
on their urges physically to be convicted of a crime. Possession of child pornography can get
a pedophile sent to the slammer. You obviously aren't nearly as bright as you believe.
The only explanation that makes any sense at all is that nobody thought there was sex occurring between Sandusky and the kid in the shower that night.
Could it have still been reported to authorities? Yes. Should it have been reported to authorities? Probably. But the only explanation that makes sense is that nobody at the time thought they were dealing with Sandusky and boy having sex in a shower.
Could it have still been reported to authorities? Yes. Should it have been reported to authorities? Probably. But the only explanation that makes sense is that nobody at the time thought they were dealing with Sandusky and boy having sex in a shower.
That’s intentionally provocative language you’re using. Joe did his part within the chain of command. He cared enough to perform his responsibilities as he was supposed to.
you have, in prior posts, surrendered that Joe followed policy and did the right thing. It is really undeniable. Joe didn't see or hear anything so could only report it up to the guy responsible for the facility (Curley) and the guy responsible for campus police (Schultz). He also followed up with MM. These are all facts.
So why are you still hounding Paterno? You are just a trouble maker. I'd put JVP WAAAAaaay down the list:
Then I get to Paterno who, I guess, should have done some kind of Quincy; you know, doing something that he was not trained nor had any business doing. Well, I guess Quincy had some kind of tangential responsibility being an ME. I don't even know anyone to compare it with.
- JS for being sick
- TSM, for not managing the charity & JS effectively
- MM, for not intervening, changing his story, and not calling the police
- Schultz, for not mounting a thorough investigation
- Curley for not intervening on Schultz to do his duty
- Dad
- Dranov (tie with Dad) for suggesting they go to a football coach instead of taking action
- Spanier, for not asking more questions
He isn't "hounding" Paterno. He is reminding those who would put Joe back up on a pedestal of
what transpired that knocked him off in the first place.
All he's here to do is provoke, my friend.
Right, the GJP which we have now established contains lies.
That the OAG knew were lies.
Lies that when a key witness wanted to correct, the OAG said "Nah, better just let it go. We don't want the truth getting in the way of our case."
