ADVERTISEMENT

Regarding the snub, the truth of the matter is...

You keep babbling about how the B1G Conference Championship Game does not produce the legitimate Conference Champion tool boy! PSU already produced the BEST RECORD BY STANDINGS AND TIEBREAKER DURING THE CONFERENCE REGULAR SEASON tool boy! (i.e., the "old system" you keep referencing). How would PSU reinforcing this with an ADDITIONAL B1G win against a Top 10 Wisconsin do anything but REINFORCE that they are the best team in the B1G Conference???
I knew you wouldn't disappoint. Please refer to my previous statement I've quoted again below.
All that being said, you're either playing one hell of a character, or you probably need to be on some meds. If you're trying to make me angry or get a rise out of me, I assure you that you cannot. I'm going to consider our conversation concluded, barring an unexpected burst of punctuation and readability on behalf of your next post.
 
I knew you wouldn't disappoint. Please refer to my previous statement I've quoted again below.

Please refer to your own statements dope - keep posting about how PSU isn't the legitimate B1G Champion with the best absolute record by your own dope statements of "standings and tiebreakers" including a head-to-head win over your precious daO$U team who is ILLEGITIMATELY representing the B1G in what is supposed to be a National Format with the BEST team from each conference.
 
PSU has the best record in B1G Conference Play, 8-1, playing in the hardest Division in all of college football.
Are you sure the B1G East is the hardest division in college football? If that's true then why did the West win 11 of the 21 crossover games, even though 14 of those 21 games were played at the East division team's home field?
 
Are you sure the B1G East is the hardest division in college football? If that's true then why did the West win 11 of the 21 crossover games, even though 14 of those 21 games were played at the East division team's home field?

The top 3 in the East were 8-1 against the West.
 
Kind of like your flukey win on Saturday as you certainly didn't dominate anything, but had a flukey pick 6 keep you in the game? Remind me again, did VT rip off 8 straight to close out the year in 2014? Oh...they didn't. Apples to peanuts there I guess.
Dont forget the fluky ref call in OT to save them as well!

Everyone keeps forgetting that PSU DOMINATED OSU in the trenches in the second half period. Oh and by the way we have the second youngest roster in D1.
 
Please refer to your own statements dope - keep posting about how PSU isn't the legitimate B1G Champion with the best absolute record by your own dope statements of "standings and tiebreakers" including a head-to-head win over your precious daO$U team who is ILLEGITIMATELY representing the B1G in what is supposed to be a National Format with the BEST team from each conference.
tumblr_inline_mocmirmhCa1rlpk9c.gif
 
The top 3 in the East were 8-1 against the West.
Again withe the cherry picking. If you completely disregard the month of September, Penn State had the best record in the Big Ten. If you complwtely disregard the worst four teams in the East division, the East had a better record than the West.

Do you guys ever look at the complete picture? Sure, the top three teams in the East did well, but the other four teams were gawdawful. They were a combined 2-10 against the West. By contrast, the bottom four teams in the West were 6-6 against the East even though 8 of those 12 games were on the road. The East has better teams at the top, but the West has better overall depth from top to bottom.

Basically, if you're one of the top three teams in the East, your divisional schedule consists of 2 difficult games and 4 bye weeks.
 
Again withe the cherry picking. If you completely disregard the month of September, Penn State had the best record in the Big Ten. If you complwtely disregard the worst four teams in the East division, the East had a better record than the West.

Do you guys ever look at the complete picture? Sure, the top three teams in the East did well, but the other four teams were gawdawful. They were a combined 2-10 against the West. By contrast, the bottom four teams in the West were 6-6 against the East even though 8 of those 12 games were on the road. The East has better teams at the top, but the West has better overall depth from top to bottom.

Basically, if you're one of the top three teams in the East, your divisional schedule consists of 2 difficult games and 4 bye weeks.

Huh??? Wisconsin was 1-2 against the East Division and had more losses to the East Division than the top 3 East Division teams had combined against the West Division in crossover games - the top 3 in the East were 8-1 against the West, 2-0 against Wisconsin and 4-1 against the top 3 teams in the West. Give me a break that the East Division was not light-years better than the West Division at the top which is the only place that matters when you're talking Division Champions and CCG representatives. You shizhole loser tools get more amusing by the day!
 
Again withe the cherry picking. If you completely disregard the month of September, Penn State had the best record in the Big Ten. If you complwtely disregard the worst four teams in the East division, the East had a better record than the West.

Do you guys ever look at the complete picture? Sure, the top three teams in the East did well, but the other four teams were gawdawful. They were a combined 2-10 against the West. By contrast, the bottom four teams in the West were 6-6 against the East even though 8 of those 12 games were on the road. The East has better teams at the top, but the West has better overall depth from top to bottom.

Basically, if you're one of the top three teams in the East, your divisional schedule consists of 2 difficult games and 4 bye weeks.
So one good team and the rest mediocre is better than three good teams and the rest not so good? I guess that means the ACC Coastal is the best division in all of college football. They're all equally mediocre.
 
So one good team and the rest mediocre is better than three good teams and the rest not so good? I guess that means the ACC Coastal is the best division in all of college football. They're all equally mediocre.

Oh yea, don't forget that the B1G West Division Champion, Wisconsin, was 1-2 against the East Division in crossover games and 6-0 in the West for an overall Conference record of 7-2?!?! LMFAO, this is strong evidence that the West Champion is stronger than the East Champion who was 8-1 overall in B1G and 5-1 versus common opponents with Wisconsin, while Wisconsin was 4-2 against those same 6 common opponents???
 
Huh??? Wisconsin was 1-2 against the East Division and had more losses to the East Division than the top 3 East Division teams had combined against the West Division in crossover games - the top 3 in the East were 8-1 against the West, 2-0 against Wisconsin and 4-1 against the top 3 teams in the West. Give me a break that the East Division was not light-years better than the West Division at the top which is the only place that matters when you're talking Division Champions and CCG representatives. You shizhole loser tools get more amusing by the day!
Just keep pretending that the West didn't win 11 of the 21 crossover games this season even though 14 of those games were played on the East team's home field.

Btw, you should be grateful for the '1' in '4-1'. Had Iowa not beaten Michigan, your team would be sitting at home tonight watching Ohio State play Wisconsin on television.

You're welcome.
 
Just keep pretending that the West didn't win 11 of the 21 crossover games this season even though 14 of those games were played on the East team's home field.

Btw, you should be grateful for the '1' in '4-1'. Had Iowa not beaten Michigan, your team would be sitting at home tonight watching Ohio State play Wisconsin on television.

You're welcome.
Yeah, you're right...the west was better. You and exactly nobody else in the world thinks that, but you know more than anyone.
 
Oh yea, don't forget that the B1G West Division Champion, Wisconsin, was 1-2 against the East Division in crossover games and 6-0 in the West for an overall Conference record of 7-2?!?! LMFAO, this is strong evidence that the West Champion is stronger than the East Champion who was 8-1 overall in B1G and 5-1 versus common opponents with Wisconsin, while Wisconsin was 4-2 against those same 6 common opponents???
Again, fixating on the top teams in the division and completely disregarding the garbage in your basement.

There were 21 crossover games. Each team, good or bad, played 3. 14 of those games were hosted by East teams. The West teams won 11 and the East teams won 10. The East is stronger at the top, but the West is stronger from top to bottom.

If there was a trophy for myopia it would be named in your honor.
 
Just keep pretending that the West didn't win 11 of the 21 crossover games this season even though 14 of those games were played on the East team's home field.

Btw, you should be grateful for the '1' in '4-1'. Had Iowa not beaten Michigan, your team would be sitting at home tonight watching Ohio State play Wisconsin on television.

You're welcome.



LMFAO!
 
Yes:

And OSU has the youngest roster. Seriously it should make for some great HTH over the next 2-3 years.
 
So Western Michigan is better than Ohio State...13>11.
That is literally one of the worst comparisons I've ever heard. I compared B1G West teams playing B1G East teams head-to-head, straight up, and you compared Ohio State's schedule to Western Michigan's schedule.

You've got a big night ahead of you. Pace yourself with the drinking.
 
That is literally one of the worst comparisons I've ever heard. I compared B1G West teams playing B1G East teams head-to-head, straight up, and you compared Ohio State's schedule to Western Michigan's schedule.

You've got a big night ahead of you. Pace yourself with the drinking.
No, you're comparing two divisions and overlooking the complete discrepancy between the top of the divisions. Yes, the bottom of the west is not as bad as the bottom of the east...but the top of the west isn't even close. You can't possibly convince me that you would rather be in the east than the west if your life depended on winning the division.
 
That is literally one of the worst comparisons I've ever heard. I compared B1G West teams playing B1G East teams head-to-head, straight up, and you compared Ohio State's schedule to Western Michigan's schedule.

You've got a big night ahead of you. Pace yourself with the drinking.
And it's not a bad comparison....you can't just go by total wins (that was the point). How many wins did the west have against the top three teams in the east and vice versa? So if a team in the west beat Rutgers, MSU and Maryland and was 3-0 doesn't mean they're dominant against the east.
 
And it's not a bad comparison....you can't just go by total wins (that was the point). How many wins did the west have against the top three teams in the east and vice versa? So if a team in the west beat Rutgers, MSU and Maryland and was 3-0 doesn't mean they're dominant against the east.
It was a laughably absurd comparison. You compared a MAC schedule to a Big Ten schedule.

My comparison is 7 B1G West teams playing 21 games against 7 B1G East teams. Each team played exactly 3 games. So for every team that got to load up on Maryland, MSU, and Maryland, someone had to go up against Penn State, Ohio State, and Michigan.

My comparison is the ENTIRE West division against the ENTIRE East division. You want to focus on just the top teams and ignore the total picture.
 
It was a laughably absurd comparison. You compared a MAC schedule to a Big Ten schedule.

My comparison is 7 B1G West teams playing 21 games against 7 B1G East teams. Each team played exactly 3 games. So for every team that got to load up on Maryland, MSU, and Maryland, someone had to go up against Penn State, Ohio State, and Michigan.

My comparison is the ENTIRE West division against the ENTIRE East division. You want to focus on just the top teams and ignore the total picture.

Really? Western Michigan was 2-0 against the B1G West this year, LMFAO! You really are the prototypical delusional Shizholian homer...
 
It was a laughably absurd comparison. You compared a MAC schedule to a Big Ten schedule.

My comparison is 7 B1G West teams playing 21 games against 7 B1G East teams. Each team played exactly 3 games. So for every team that got to load up on Maryland, MSU, and Maryland, someone had to go up against Penn State, Ohio State, and Michigan.

My comparison is the ENTIRE West division against the ENTIRE East division. You want to focus on just the top teams and ignore the total picture.
No, I was comparing wins against wins like you did. 11-10 is pretty even...but the west was horrible against the upper echelon of the east...so what exactly is your argument? If it's that the west has better balance then you're right. They have one good team, a few okay teams and a couple bad teams. If your argument is that the west is a better division, then you're way off. Having three out of seven teams being talked about for the national playoffs trumps not only the Big west, but every division in college football.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT