ADVERTISEMENT

Rule change wishlist for 2025/6

Coaches that leave the coaching area or use foul language are ejected and the team is deducted a point.
My pet peeve. As a former official (both wrestling and soccer) that bothered me to no end. The first coach I carded for leaving the coaching box was my last in that league. Word spread fast and the coaches started behaving.
1e650d08-fdef-4547-82e2-3a23e414e86d_text.gif
 
The lollygager rule. These guys that take their sweet time getting back to the line. I'm looking at you JB. Request they get to the line and they sit and pull up their socks, BAM stall call.

Keckeisen got hit with a stall call for not promptly coming back to center after a restart during his finals match with Plott at B12 last weekend. Apparently lallygagging is a thing with him.

It happens around 12:35 of this video:

 
Last edited:
Ok, two weeks of downtime, so I will try not to not you with this old and tired topic, but I have only 2 that are timely and relevant.

1). Wrestling from one or both knees in neutral gets a 5 count then a stall warning. It's away too defensive, slows the action, and is plain boring. It's got to go. PS can someone at least try an outside sweep single against the post leg? Low risk, of a reattack, and it might just be the solution to this torturous technique. PSS - yes this means you Drake and Angelo!!!

2). We do NOT need a step out point in Folk, but we absolutely need to enforce fleeing the mat. My #1 example is near the boundary in neutral where one wrestler has a leg. Whether standing or on the mat every single dual you see multiple examples where the defensive wrestler gives it everything he's got to flee or pull both wrestlers out. A near takedown turns into a restart. It's criminal and drives me friggin nuts, not to mention how blatantly it's used all the time. You should never be able to use the out of bounds as a means to a restart when on the verge of giving up points.
Also, when a guy is riding and only has a lot or toe inbounds just to keep the clock going, call for a restart.
No stall warning - it is an automatic point.
If no score at the end of the first period, the guy who took the least shots or simply ref's discretion gets hit for stalling and theater guy gets a point.
 
Interesting topic. The two year cycle for the current Rules and Interpretations ends with the 2025 NCAA Wrestling Championships, so a new two year cycle (2025-26 through 2026-27) begins with a publication of a new rulebook sometime in August, 2025 or so. It was said several times in this thread that changes should not make the referee's job any more difficult that it is, so rules that are way subjective should never see the pages of a rulebook, imo.

Frankly, I can't think of a single significant change to make. Last cycle had the 3-point takedown, and the 3-point nearfall added, and a whole bunch of less-significant changes. Whatever is done (other than for wrestler safety or administrative in nature) should be done with the intent of making wresting more exciting.

EDIT: I looked for minutes to meetings that might give some clue as to what the NCAA Wrestling Committee is considering. Other than clearing up some of the wrestler decent language, there was no mention of possible future changes could be found. I believe there is an April 2025 meeting, and we could hear something out of that meeting.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hlstone
I honestly don't understand how the below the waist stalling 5 count is enforced.
Must you be on the mat? I've seen many many matches where the 5 count begins on the mat, the bottom wrestler gets to his feet in a defensive single leg position, and the count stops. I've seen the bottom wrestler go standing position and the top wrestler drops to a leg and there is an immediete 5 count started. Other times in the same situation the referee lets them hop around for 10 seconds and then starts a count, or a count never begins. WTF is the actual rule?
 
I honestly don't understand how the below the waist stalling 5 count is enforced.
Must you be on the mat? I've seen many many matches where the 5 count begins on the mat, the bottom wrestler gets to his feet in a defensive single leg position, and the count stops. I've seen the bottom wrestler go standing position and the top wrestler drops to a leg and there is an immediete 5 count started. Other times in the same situation the referee lets them hop around for 10 seconds and then starts a count, or a count never begins. WTF is the actual rule?
If the bottom guy starts a scramble and grabs legs 1st then the ref won't count. It's definitely a judgement call by the ref on who dropped down to the leg 1st
 
If the bottom guy starts a scramble and grabs legs 1st then the ref won't count. It's definitely a judgement call by the ref on who dropped down to the leg 1st
The problems here are (1) we've seen that start the count too; (2) that describes none of the situations @82bordeaux listed.
 
Not just to be contrary, but the push out rule has made freestyle wrestling action more continuous and exciting. Further, I listen to FRL often and do not find any of them to be biased against PSU. I'm with you about the knee wrestling, but hate to see yet another rule added requiring the official to count.
 
ok guys new rule here.I am pretty much had enough of these guys grabbing a leg and rolling around wasting time as soon as they get in that situation stop and go back to feet you wanna see TD or rolling around like a little kid?
 
ok guys new rule here.I am pretty much had enough of these guys grabbing a leg and rolling around wasting time as soon as they get in that situation stop and go back to feet you wanna see TD or rolling around like a little kid?
I tend to agree with you. To me, as soon as there is a lull in movement, a stalemate should be called. Plus, I hate the heightened risk of injury in those situations
 
A black and white stalling procedure, versus a gray area that is up for each individual ref
 
Going to a knee while tied up is different than going to a knee while disengaged. Disengaged should be automatic stalling.
3 count is fair. If there is a hard snap, loss of balance and getting up in some scenarios is very understandable for defensive reasons while getting back to your feet.
 
I still think if there is a 3 point takedown then we need a 3 point reversal. 2 points for reversal just doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. IMO, it discourages potential mat wrestling. 3 points for reversal makes it more worth the hassle.
I see 3point reversal as a bad move. Yes i see your point and it does make sense but I think it will actually slow down matches.

It should entice more mat wrestling but with that you get less wrestling from the top guy, he ends up just staying in good position instead of working for a turn or fall in which they already don't do enough of.
 
3 count is fair. If there is a hard snap, loss of balance and getting up in some scenarios is very understandable for defensive reasons while getting back to your feet.
No. We don't need to give refs additional counts -- and especially not additional counts with different durations.

The wrestler is responsible for improving position. That means getting up immediately after a sprawl or defensive recovery. If he doesn't he's stalling. No count needed. Keep it easy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nitlion1986
Every 30 secs for which a wrestler does not score, he is deducted one penalty point for inaction. They should liven things up a bit.
 
I’m tired of people wrestling on the edge of the mat, if they stay out there there should be a point given to the other wrestler no warnings
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nitlion1986
I’m tired of people wrestling on the edge of the mat, if they stay out there there should be a point given to the other wrestler no warnings

There definitely needs to be a rule that generates a stall call if a wrestler puts both feet outside the circle voluntarily or while engaged - if they keep both feet fully outside the circle for more than a 3 count a point should be awarded to the other wrestler, action stopped and wrestlers returned to middle. There is zero reason to give one wrestler the distinct advantage of wrestling from OB (essentially, the other wrestler can't shoot because even if they get to the legs or ankles, they're OB.). When you allow it to go on for an entire period, you're rewarding the diametrically wrong wrestler.
 
Every 30 secs for which a wrestler does not score, he is deducted one penalty point for inaction. They should liven things up a bit.
Ferrari would've had a negative score against Stout and Buchanan, at least.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mcpat
I’m tired of people wrestling on the edge of the mat, if they stay out there there should be a point given to the other wrestler no warnings
And yet people keep resisting the pushout rule, despite decades of evidence showing that it keeps the action away from the edge. Also despite the fact that nobody understands the current boundary stalling rules because the calls vary from ref to ref.
 
Also, when a guy is riding and only has a lot or toe inbounds just to keep the clock going, call for a restart.
No stall warning - it is an automatic point.
If no score at the end of the first period, the guy who took the least shots or simply ref's discretion gets hit for stalling and theater guy gets a point.
If stalling was called consistently from Ref to Ref and Conference to Conference that would make sense. But one Ref's stalling is not always another Ref's opinion. At least give me a warning to let me know which one you are.
 
No. We don't need to give refs additional counts -- and especially not additional counts with different durations.

The wrestler is responsible for improving position. That means getting up immediately after a sprawl or defensive recovery. If he doesn't he's stalling. No count needed. Keep it easy.
there again, pulling and crawling out of bounds when someone is on your leg is never called... basically fleeing
 
No. We don't need to give refs additional counts -- and especially not additional counts with different durations.

The wrestler is responsible for improving position. That means getting up immediately after a sprawl or defensive recovery. If he doesn't he's stalling. No count needed. Keep it easy.
I see where you are coming from.

I see at as a lack of action, very little thought to the situation since there is no other action on the mat.

In all matches you see athletes taking 3 sec to collect themselves. I see no problem in letting them collect them selves after getting unexpectedly knocked down and the attacker takes a step back, ie- optional start, attacker wrestling the line.

Defensive strategy vs stalling. This position was made for strategy but turned to stalling.
 
Last edited:
If the bottom guy starts a scramble and grabs legs 1st then the ref won't count. It's definitely a judgement call by the ref on who dropped down to the leg 1st
Just an opinion. If the wrestling starts from the referee's position and they end up in a position that has both guys trying to pass an ankle. If the top guy stops trying to improve position and is hanging on waiting on the stalemate call, call it a stall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: creamery freak
The end of a match where the winning wrestler puts it in run and escape, call the stall every single time. If that occurred so blatantly in the first 6 minutes of a match it would get called over and over. You are winning by a point or 3 with 20 seconds to go if you don't present yourself that should be called, and called and called.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT