ADVERTISEMENT

SIAP/FC: A. Lubrano's email to Eric Barron re: JVP not recognized among best-ever coaches by SI

Chances Barron will ever see that email? Better chance of winning powerball while getting struck by lightning
 
I get being mad about JoPa’s exclusion and I guess one could argue Pres. Baron could have spoken out. But the BOT runs the show in any university and Baron wasn’t president when the damage was done. So assuming the narrative of OGBOT being responsible, Baron’s hands would have been tied—even though he said he’s review when under pressure.
I didn’t know he was a baron as well. Boy , I hope he finishes that freeh report review soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_1eeb2b426hv3y
Don't you recall that he told us that he has more important things to do........like build a museum.

You laugh (cry?) now. Just wait until you see our academic ranking once the museum opens.

:eek:
 
Have not seen this posted here after being posted 3 days ago on Facebook, so apologies if a repeat.
Copying (in Italics) an Aug. 15 post by Anthony Lubrano @lubrano on Facebook (yes, I know... it's an SI list/article, but still):

I sent Eric Barron this email tonight. Copied were Mark Dambly, Matt Schuyler, Jake Corman. Al Lord and Bob Capretto (the latter two because of their undying love for Joe and PSU and because I served with them on the BOT.

Today at 7:54 pm

Eric-

Guess who is not on this list?

https://www.si.com/…/best-coaches-college-football-history-…

The guy won two national titles and went undefeated 4 other times (which is essentially 6 National titles)—won more Bowls than anyone, won more games than anyone, never went on probation, graduated his players, forced instant replay on college football and oh yeah was the first guy to win all 5 major bowls —Orange, Sugar, Cotton, Rose and Fiesta and accumulated a record of 14-5 in those major bowl games. But sure he isn’t one of the top ten guys of all time.....and you know why he's not on that list?

Because of your cowardice.

Congratulations.

Anthony


And, in a LOL irony that is so fitting of Dambly's lack of self-awareness:

Here is Mark Dambly’s response:

Anthony, you are certainly entitled to your opinion, but that does not entitle you to be rude and inconsiderate to President Baron. Frankly, I am not interested in hearing from you if this is the manner in which you intend on communicating. It is not becoming of a mature adult.


I think some of the responses were written by our fellow BWI posters!
No doubt Joe is top three if not number 1. And of course younger folks have no clue and some older folks conveniently forget how dominant Joe was for the first 20-25 years of his career. Most coaches don't have to deal with having four undefeated seasons and getting nothing for them. And a Paterno in his prime would have owned a playoff system as he owned the bowls.
The only downside of Joe is he got old and lost his edge in all areas including facilities, staff, and recruiting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PSU_Chicago
SI is ball less as well. They didn’t want to deal with the ignorant folks that believe everything from MSM and that narrative that would whine to them about including Paterno. So rather than having the guts and integrity to include him they took the easy cowardly way out by omitting him.
 
They certainly are cowards and hypocrites.

Hayes probably has a bad rap with other teams' fans based almost solely on his infamous 1978 'slugging an opposing playert' incident vs. Clemson in the Gator Bowl. And that was a very bad incident, caught live on national TV, no arguing that he lost his cool to an extreme - even for him, given his legendary on-field temper. No fact-freeh investigation needed there.

But it is important to know that Hayes was largely beloved by his players, much as Joe was by his. Hayes nearly convinced Matt Suhey to go to Ohio State based on how much Matt respected him. Apparently, Hayes kept a huge rolodex on his desk and would pick out a couple of former players to call randomly to check up on them and their families. Just as Joe was known for recalling players' families names and keeping up with important events, Hayes apparently did the same. The life lessons were very important to Hayes, as they were to Joe and most any other coach who "gets it".

I have no issue with Hayes as a coach and person. He embarrassed himself with that punch, but his entire body of work is not overshadowed by that to any real extent, imo. I'd probably leave him in over one or two others on the list based on the program he ran.
Personal note on Woody--I met him twice. My last term at tOSU (grad school) I was taking teaching classes. He liked to come over to the Education building and talk with the future teachers. I was told by others that it was pretty common for him to do that. I was one of them (though I ended up getting another job not in education). He always thought education was important. I respected that.
 
Personal note on Woody--I met him twice. My last term at tOSU (grad school) I was taking teaching classes. He liked to come over to the Education building and talk with the future teachers. I was told by others that it was pretty common for him to do that. I was one of them (though I ended up getting another job not in education). He always thought education was important. I respected that.
I hope thinking education is important is not such a rarity in the USA. As for Hayes, he was nuts. And not as good a coach as JVP.
 
I originally read Batman in that statement.
Riddle me this Batman........ which party would you sign your soul to....
the Japanese, or the American prisoners kneeling in their graves waiting to be executed or our prisoners watching knowing in time this would also be their faith.
In one of my father's many war crime depositions, he described the execution of five american POWs while kneeling in their graves they sang God Bless America prior to being shot......
Let it sink children...look to the left, look to the right...can you select the Patriot that will give his life to protect your well being.
 
Last edited:
SI isn't alone. I google-searched "greatest college football coaches all time" and ALL of the below articles (1) are not the SI article, (2) were among the Top 5 hits, (3) were written in the last 3 years, and (4) don't have JoePa in the Top 10:

https://www.foxsports.com/college-f...ad-coaches-in-college-football-history-060917

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/890705-college-football-the-top-50-coaches-of-all-time

https://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/sec-football/10-best-football-coaches-all-time/

-----------

JoePa in the #8-#14 range seems fair to me.

Most # of victories all-time is a great mark.

He also took over a program that was already good and will forever have structural advantages in their favor. 2 National Championships is a lot but there are 15 (!!!) coaches with more. His record in the 2000s was poor and he was a below-average coach for that decade - that hits his legacy as well.

JoePa was a very very good college football coach. I don't think he's among the 4 on Mount Rushmore, either.
 
SI isn't alone. I google-searched "greatest college football coaches all time" and ALL of the below articles (1) are not the SI article, (2) were among the Top 5 hits, (3) were written in the last 3 years, and (4) don't have JoePa in the Top 10:

https://www.foxsports.com/college-f...ad-coaches-in-college-football-history-060917

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/890705-college-football-the-top-50-coaches-of-all-time

https://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/sec-football/10-best-football-coaches-all-time/

-----------

JoePa in the #8-#14 range seems fair to me.

Most # of victories all-time is a great mark.

He also took over a program that was already good and will forever have structural advantages in their favor. 2 National Championships is a lot but there are 15 (!!!) coaches with more. His record in the 2000s was poor and he was a below-average coach for that decade - that hits his legacy as well.

JoePa was a very very good college football coach. I don't think he's among the 4 on Mount Rushmore, either.

Go back to fvcking yourself.
 
erie-barron---file-photo-jpeg-0624c0695911d690.jpeg

2792999029_small_1.jpg
 
SI isn't alone. I google-searched "greatest college football coaches all time" and ALL of the below articles (1) are not the SI article, (2) were among the Top 5 hits, (3) were written in the last 3 years, and (4) don't have JoePa in the Top 10:

https://www.foxsports.com/college-f...ad-coaches-in-college-football-history-060917

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/890705-college-football-the-top-50-coaches-of-all-time

https://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/sec-football/10-best-football-coaches-all-time/

-----------

JoePa in the #8-#14 range seems fair to me.

Most # of victories all-time is a great mark.

He also took over a program that was already good and will forever have structural advantages in their favor. 2 National Championships is a lot but there are 15 (!!!) coaches with more. His record in the 2000s was poor and he was a below-average coach for that decade - that hits his legacy as well.

JoePa was a very very good college football coach. I don't think he's among the 4 on Mount Rushmore, either.
You can not be serious?!
 
SI isn't alone. I google-searched "greatest college football coaches all time" and ALL of the below articles (1) are not the SI article, (2) were among the Top 5 hits, (3) were written in the last 3 years, and (4) don't have JoePa in the Top 10:

https://www.foxsports.com/college-f...ad-coaches-in-college-football-history-060917

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/890705-college-football-the-top-50-coaches-of-all-time

https://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/sec-football/10-best-football-coaches-all-time/

-----------

JoePa in the #8-#14 range seems fair to me.

Most # of victories all-time is a great mark.

He also took over a program that was already good and will forever have structural advantages in their favor. 2 National Championships is a lot but there are 15 (!!!) coaches with more. His record in the 2000s was poor and he was a below-average coach for that decade - that hits his legacy as well.

JoePa was a very very good college football coach. I don't think he's among the 4 on Mount Rushmore, either.

Osborne also took over a program which was already good. His bowl record was pretty average. Would you penalize him for all that?

Also, Joe's record in the 2000s (2000-2010) was 84-52. It's not up to his usual standard but it's hardly "poor". Is a 61% win rate "below average" in your opinion?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bison13
Osborne also took over a program which was already good. His bowl record was nothing to brag about either. Would you penalize him for all that?

Also, Joe's record in the 2000s (2000-2010) was 84-52. It's not up to his usual standard but it's hardly "poor". Is a 61% win rate "below average" in your opinion?

As for Osborne - I would. Actually, Bob Devaney is the guy who gets under-rated one in these "best all time coaches" lists.

And 61% is absolutely "below average" for Penn State football. The 2000s were our worst decade - at least in terms of looking only at win percentage - in the entire 1940s to present day era!
 
Some 20 year old chic writes this article and we are surprised by her ignorance? Really.

What the hell does she know.
 
SI isn't alone. I google-searched "greatest college football coaches all time" and ALL of the below articles (1) are not the SI article, (2) were among the Top 5 hits, (3) were written in the last 3 years, and (4) don't have JoePa in the Top 10:

https://www.foxsports.com/college-f...ad-coaches-in-college-football-history-060917

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/890705-college-football-the-top-50-coaches-of-all-time

https://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/sec-football/10-best-football-coaches-all-time/

-----------

JoePa in the #8-#14 range seems fair to me.

Most # of victories all-time is a great mark.

He also took over a program that was already good and will forever have structural advantages in their favor. 2 National Championships is a lot but there are 15 (!!!) coaches with more. His record in the 2000s was poor and he was a below-average coach for that decade - that hits his legacy as well.

JoePa was a very very good college football coach. I don't think he's among the 4 on Mount Rushmore, either.

Boy, haven't seen you for ages. Figured it would be a thread defending Paterno that would bring you out of the woodwork. Sure was nice when you were away.
 
As for Osborne - I would. Actually, Bob Devaney is the guy who gets under-rated one in these "best all time coaches" lists.

And 61% is absolutely "below average" for Penn State football. The 2000s were our worst decade - at least in terms of looking only at win percentage - in the entire 1940s to present day era!

"our worst decade"?

mad.jpg
 
That’s just f^cking stupid.


I guess he doesn’t have any signature wins.



(BTW: You interminable douche, the 10 Year Old Bleacher Report “article” you cited (which is lol-able enough a statement on its own) had Paterno listed as 4th.


No. 4 Joe Paterno
47 OF 51

  1. Career Record: 406-136-3 (74%)

    To this day, Paterno's raspy voice just wreaks of a college football legend. Going 5-5 in his first season way back in 1966 was where everything started for the all-time winningest coach in FBS history.

    Paterno's 406 wins is the most ever and it looks as if nobody will ever catch the 84-year-old Penn State coach.

    In Happy Valley, "Joe Pa" is the first and only FBS coach to lead his team to 400 or more wins. He has also led his program to two national championships ('82, '86), five undefeated seasons and 37 career bowls (24-12-1).

    There is no doubting that Paterno is one of the greatest in the history of the sport as he is one of just three active who have already been inducted into the College Football Hall of Fame (Chris Ault and John Gagliardi).”
Not very good “number recognition” for a CountVonNitWit? Eh?)


“If I lived your life...... I’d shoot myself”.

I posted the wrong one. My bad:

http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/192030618/best-100-college-football-coaches-ever-top-25
 
Judging Paterno’s legacy purely on wins and losses is really missing the point. When you look at his profound impact on the school, his incredible longevity (61 years at the same institution imo separates him from the pack) and the standard he set on and off the field, he really is THE quintessential college football coach. It would be interesting to see a poll done by current and former coaches. I’m guessing Joe would be extremely high on that list.

SI isn't alone. I google-searched "greatest college football coaches all time" and ALL of the below articles (1) are not the SI article, (2) were among the Top 5 hits, (3) were written in the last 3 years, and (4) don't have JoePa in the Top 10:

https://www.foxsports.com/college-f...ad-coaches-in-college-football-history-060917

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/890705-college-football-the-top-50-coaches-of-all-time

https://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/sec-football/10-best-football-coaches-all-time/

-----------

JoePa in the #8-#14 range seems fair to me.

Most # of victories all-time is a great mark.

He also took over a program that was already good and will forever have structural advantages in their favor. 2 National Championships is a lot but there are 15 (!!!) coaches with more. His record in the 2000s was poor and he was a below-average coach for that decade - that hits his legacy as well.

JoePa was a very very good college football coach. I don't think he's among the 4 on Mount Rushmore, either.
 
SI isn't alone. I google-searched "greatest college football coaches all time" and ALL of the below articles (1) are not the SI article, (2) were among the Top 5 hits, (3) were written in the last 3 years, and (4) don't have JoePa in the Top 10:

https://www.foxsports.com/college-f...ad-coaches-in-college-football-history-060917

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/890705-college-football-the-top-50-coaches-of-all-time

https://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/sec-football/10-best-football-coaches-all-time/

-----------

JoePa in the #8-#14 range seems fair to me.

Most # of victories all-time is a great mark.

He also took over a program that was already good and will forever have structural advantages in their favor. 2 National Championships is a lot but there are 15 (!!!) coaches with more. His record in the 2000s was poor and he was a below-average coach for that decade - that hits his legacy as well.

JoePa was a very very good college football coach. I don't think he's among the 4 on Mount Rushmore, either.
Joe took over a decent but not very prestigious program and turned it into one of the most successful programs of its times. Penn State was not considered any where close to a premier program in the 1950’s and early 1960’s. Joe changed all of that... certainly to a greater extent than many of the coaches recognized on the SI list.
 
SI isn't alone. I google-searched "greatest college football coaches all time" and ALL of the below articles (1) are not the SI article, (2) were among the Top 5 hits, (3) were written in the last 3 years, and (4) don't have JoePa in the Top 10:

https://www.foxsports.com/college-f...ad-coaches-in-college-football-history-060917

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/890705-college-football-the-top-50-coaches-of-all-time

https://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/sec-football/10-best-football-coaches-all-time/

-----------

JoePa in the #8-#14 range seems fair to me.

Most # of victories all-time is a great mark.

He also took over a program that was already good and will forever have structural advantages in their favor. 2 National Championships is a lot but there are 15 (!!!) coaches with more. His record in the 2000s was poor and he was a below-average coach for that decade - that hits his legacy as well.

JoePa was a very very good college football coach. I don't think he's among the 4 on Mount Rushmore, either.
In all fairness, it was only his record in the first half of the 2000’s...in the second half of the decade he was 51-13.
 
As for Osborne - I would. Actually, Bob Devaney is the guy who gets under-rated one in these "best all time coaches" lists.

And 61% is absolutely "below average" for Penn State football. The 2000s were our worst decade - at least in terms of looking only at win percentage - in the entire 1940s to present day era!
Jay says hello.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: colt21
Joe took over a decent but not very prestigious program and turned it into one of the most successful programs of its times. Penn State was not considered any where close to a premier program in the 1950’s and early 1960’s. Joe changed all of that... certainly to a greater extent than many of the coaches recognized on the SI list.

Joe made PSU a national program. Under Rip and predecessors PSU was viewed as a regional program.

Joe had to be a big part of the program under Rip due to his recruiting efforts. So he played a large role in establishing whatever he inherited.
 
Even if you think it was rude, which I don't, so what? Dambly's response was essentially, "how dare you be rude to the king"? What is wrong with this guy?

Observations of reality aren’t rude.

I view it as doing him a favor, pointing out a glaring weakness when those closest to him will not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WyomingLion
I guess had Anthony been polite in his e-mail message, barren would have taken it upon himself to restore Joe's legacy at Penn State. They would probably be putting the statue up by now. Shame on Anthony for not killing them with kindness.
 
As for Osborne - I would. Actually, Bob Devaney is the guy who gets under-rated one in these "best all time coaches" lists.

And 61% is absolutely "below average" for Penn State football. The 2000s were our worst decade - at least in terms of looking only at win percentage - in the entire 1940s to present day era!
Add on the four undefeated seasons and Joe had six NCs. Hell if the idiots recognized 69 and 94 he's got four NCs.
And he was probably the greatest bowl coach ever so God only knows what he would do in a playoff.
And after 86 Joe had made Penn State the top program in the country. We won the NC in 82, played for the NC in 85, and won the NC in 86. He also had the best winning percentage of any coach at the time.
He had a bad spell in the early 2000s because of age but was still great enough to turn it around and if not for bs at scum Penn State would have been undefeated again in 2005.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob78
Everything points to Corbett when it comes to why the narrative is what it is, but Penn State can rewrite this at any time. Hell, even Corbett said firing JVP may have been a mistake!

Of course Penn State can do whatever it wants. corbett is invisible now. What is he doing, “working” for a third-rate law firm in Harrisburg?
 
Have not seen this posted here after being posted 3 days ago on Facebook, so apologies if a repeat.
Copying (in Italics) an Aug. 15 post by Anthony Lubrano @lubrano on Facebook (yes, I know... it's an SI list/article, but still):

I sent Eric Barron this email tonight. Copied were Mark Dambly, Matt Schuyler, Jake Corman. Al Lord and Bob Capretto (the latter two because of their undying love for Joe and PSU and because I served with them on the BOT.

Today at 7:54 pm

Eric-

Guess who is not on this list?

https://www.si.com/…/best-coaches-college-football-history-…

The guy won two national titles and went undefeated 4 other times (which is essentially 6 National titles)—won more Bowls than anyone, won more games than anyone, never went on probation, graduated his players, forced instant replay on college football and oh yeah was the first guy to win all 5 major bowls —Orange, Sugar, Cotton, Rose and Fiesta and accumulated a record of 14-5 in those major bowl games. But sure he isn’t one of the top ten guys of all time.....and you know why he's not on that list?

Because of your cowardice.

Congratulations.

Anthony


And, in a LOL irony that is so fitting of Dambly's lack of self-awareness:

Here is Mark Dambly’s response:

Anthony, you are certainly entitled to your opinion, but that does not entitle you to be rude and inconsiderate to President Baron. Frankly, I am not interested in hearing from you if this is the manner in which you intend on communicating. It is not becoming of a mature adult.


I think some of the responses were written by our fellow BWI posters!


Dambly is a turd.

Barron is Barron.

Red Faced, nothing more.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT