ADVERTISEMENT

Spanier Avoids Jailtime?

As are:

Dambly
Lubert
Surma
Hintz
Dandrea
Casey
Silvis
Suhey
Masser
Eckel
Peetz
Barash
Schuyler
Fenza
Harpster
Rapp
Pegula
Harpster
Delligatti
Myers
Riley
Jones
Garban
Kleppler
Amoros
Rivera
Shipley
Baldwin
Broadhurst
Han
Steele
Redding
Cotner
Detwiler

Etc
Etc
So much to take pride in.
 
Jenny Storm? She's a Bag of Hair (though there is more appropriate term :) ).

That's been the case since forever. (Talk to any righteous individual involved in the REAL activity of trying to protect victims, for a good picture on Jennifer Storm).

This current Jenny Storm Clown Show - - - - - playing the "Race/White Privilege" nonsense?
That is Jeffy Simmons level stoopid.
"Governor Tom Corbett nominated Jennifer R. Storm as Commonwealth Victim Advocate on November 8, 2013. She was confirmed by the state Senate on Dec. 10, 2013, to serve a six-year term."

Her term's almost up. Have to get some parting shots in for Ex. Governor Corporate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: step.eng69
C&S were pushed to their limit, and took what they thought was going to be a favorable plea deal. They got screwed when the judge decided to grandstand and change the deal.

I also would love to see them take some action, or get some compensation, vs. PA. Unlikely.

I don't think they will speak out, even post-probation. Their distrust of the system will stop them.... I would guess they are concerned that the judge would find a way to take action if they speak out. Hope I am wrong.

Also (in reply to a different post), C&S, and Spanier, were sentenced to county jail, not state prison. Thank goodness. Still a bad place to be, some potentially dangerous people in there, but county vs. state, plus work-release, helped to keep them relatively safe. As far as I know, they suffered no physical harm.

An aside... Interesting that PSU is using their innocence in their argument vs. the insurance carriers who don't want to reimburse PSU. The OGBOT, and even Dunham (Dumdum?) knows they got a horrible deal, and will happily use that for their own advantage in order to recoup money from the insurance co.
C&S were blackmailed and their attorneys acquiesced. And Spanier should sue Penn State as well.
 
So Curley and Schultz pled guilty to a law that didn't even apply. Wonder what this means for them now

I think we all at the time knew this was an outrageous charge. Only a few lawyers here but when we heard that they were charging him based on a law that changed, we all had a wtf moment.
C&S were blackmailed and their attorneys acquiesced. And Spanier should sue Penn State as well.

Spanier is still making $555,000 a year from penn state as a tenured professor on paid administrative leave.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 91Joe95
Gee, I guess it’s her place to criticize the court. Probably in that job description. Sometimes it’s best to stay in your lane.

Funny how someone appointed by a rich, powerful, white man who was a main actor in all this is complaining about someone who's a lot less rich and powerful (though still white) having their constitutional rights upheld.
 
@JmmyW on Twitter:

So, in summary,
- the PA OAG wrote the jury instructions, using the 2007 law
- the PA OAG was present in chambers when the defense team argued to only use language from the 2001 law
- the PA OAG denied to Federal Court that they used the 2007 law

Hopefully he comes into one of these threads if he has not already and shares the details he has laid out on Twitter. Imo, the OAG looks even worse than suspected once I saw how JimmyW laid it out.
 
@JmmyW on Twitter:

So, in summary,
- the PA OAG wrote the jury instructions, using the 2007 law
- the PA OAG was present in chambers when the defense team argued to only use language from the 2001 law
- the PA OAG denied to Federal Court that they used the 2007 law

Hopefully he comes into one of these threads if he has not already and shares the details he has laid out on Twitter. Imo, the OAG looks even worse than suspected once I saw how JimmyW laid it out.
Keep in mind Bob, that the OAG isn't just one person - it's been....three different AGs running the office and blessing these actions, and countless others associated with it - so the entire Office is a joke - it's now an issue of the culture of stupidity within the Offices of the Attorney General - systemic and cultural stupidity.

They are lawyers - they should know the law.
 
@Zenophile - For some reason, I cannot link the Twitter dialogue from @JmmyW . It really breaks it all down into a simple read (that even I can understand!).

In the absence of Jimmy posting here, if you can link, and if you have the inclination to, it's good stuff for all to see. Thanks.
 
@JmmyW on Twitter:

So, in summary,
- the PA OAG wrote the jury instructions, using the 2007 law
- the PA OAG was present in chambers when the defense team argued to only use language from the 2001 law
- the PA OAG denied to Federal Court that they used the 2007 law

Hopefully he comes into one of these threads if he has not already and shares the details he has laid out on Twitter. Imo, the OAG looks even worse than suspected once I saw how JimmyW laid it out.
As I just mentioned in another thread (& @JmmyW has so eloquently illustrated), the OAG has really jumped the shark on this one. If I didn't know better, I'd say that Josh is more than a little concerned that he won't have the might of the main stream media to taint his jury pool this time.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT