I read titles and expect relevance!Or you could not read this one until Stevens announces. It’s easy to not click on a thread.
I read titles and expect relevance!Or you could not read this one until Stevens announces. It’s easy to not click on a thread.
Lower your expectations.I read titles and expect relevance!
OR...you and your minions could post appropriately..but I guess that still places my expectations too high, right?Lower your expectations.
I’m going to defend Franklin and McSorley in any thread regardless of the topic especially against unfair criticisms.OR...you and your minions could post appropriately..but I guess that still places my expectations too high, right?
Yeah 14 pages ago.Long tine ago it did...but it has drifted far off course!
Wish I could like this more than once! Agree with that sentiment whole-heartedlyI’m going to defend Franklin and McSorley in any thread regardless of the topic especially against unfair criticisms.
I love Franklin. Just think he is being inconsistent in this case. But I also think he needs to improve or we are going to see a lot of 2018-sequels seasons. And to me that is not ‘elite’ (or even very good) - Franklin’s Definition of success - not mine.You kind of used it as a bash Franklin thread from the beginning.
I am fully on board whether he does or does not - as long as he continues to run a clean program. But I am looking and hoping for better results. And holding Franklin accountable to his own definition of success.He is trying to get better. He is probably using YOUR example of FArmer and applying it to QB. He is probably just going with the best qB regardless of age. Are you on board?
I love Franklin. Just think he is being inconsistent in this case. But I also think he needs to improve or we are going to see a lot of 2018-sequels seasons. And to me that is not ‘elite’ (or even very good) - Franklin’s Definition of success - not mine.
Purdue did run similar plays vs OSU, however they blocked them very differently, and because they did they were able to executeI know that Purdue ran similar plays vs OSU and they broke them for long runs. Assuming plays that don't work are bad calls is ignoring the fact that there are 2 teams on the field and they are coached to stuff you.
Maybe Franklin doesn’t need to change as much as your expectations.I am fully on board whether he does or does not - as long as he continues to run a clean program. But I am looking and hoping for better results. And holding Franklin accountable to his own definition of success.
Yeah alright. So the team didn't get beat by Ohio State.....the coaches did.Purdue did run similar plays vs OSU, however they blocked them very differently, and because they did they were able to execute
And this is proof of what? That Clifford is better?Stevens not wanted nor needed at IU, according to Hoosiers Central. So if Stevens would have been the starter at PSU this fall, IU would have three, count ‘em, THREE quarterbacks better than him.
As Richie Ashburn would say, hard to believe Harry.
and the crying shame to all of that, two years in a row.Yeah alright. So the team didn't get beat by Ohio State.....the coaches did.
fire them all. all they have to do is read here.and the crying shame to all of that, two years in a row.
okay but when you think about it, how many are left from CJF's original staff?fire them all. all they have to do is read here.
but if they didn't puke after watching this Sunday AM.....fire them all. all they have to do is read here.
Either play the best players all the time.Not really. You just ignore all the variables that don't fit your agenda.
Farmer has NOTHING to do with Stevens. LB has nothing to do with QB. A position with depth will be tougher to get on the field than a position with no depth. You also ignore the fact that sTevens left BEFORE the season so we don't really know if Franklin would have started him or not. Your whole argument is trash.
Did you support BArkley starting at the end of the season as a true freshman? Do you think all true freshman should start or are you inconsistent?
I did coach.....and every time we lost it was my fault.but if they didn't puke after watching this Sunday AM.....
I mean 4 straight snaps of man free, and they can't gain an inch?
they lined right up in it!! no disguieses, just played it straight.
And they are getting paid millions of dollars?
You coached, you could have had a better plan than this....its not like OSU hadn't played it in the past.
Not really but I get your driftI did coach.....and every time we lost it was my fault.
Kentucky is much much better than Michigan State. Of course you know this or ...... Maybe you you clueless. Troll or clueless which is it?If we keep creating these types of excuses and accepting losses to inferior teams (and despite couple things of very good players, let’s face it Penn State has much better talent then Kentucky), we are going to be looking up at a lot of disappointing 3 & 4 loss seasons. Listen to Franklin’s “ elite “ lecture.
Love Trace and how hard he played. But if you think that he is the best QB in PSU history you have a lot more to learn about Penn State football than I previously thought. Did he deliver when we needed him the most? Sadly, he did not: Pitt 201: mental and physical errors lost the game and cost PSU a playoff spot. USC 2016, mental error cost PSU that game. Michigan State in 2017 and 2018? How did we fair in those games? Ohio State in 2017: could not close the game out. Kentucky game? Did not make the play needed to win the game. Great kid and competitor, good QB, but we will need better to take the next step. That is on Franklin to find him and not express “ man crushes.”
Either play the best players all the time.
Or make exceptions for loyalty for ‘good soldiers.’
Recognizing that sometimes it is a close call.
No, I don’t know if Stevens is better than Clifford. But I think he deserved a shot based upon a better body of work and solid play over a career. And I also think that he should have been given more of a chance to play based upon the fact that the QB position has not delivered fir PSU in key spots over the past 3 years. Would have loved to have seen if Stevens could have been a difference-maker. What he showed was tempting to say that he might have been able.
Either play the best players all the time.
Or make exceptions for loyalty for ‘good soldiers.’
Recognizing that sometimes it is a close call.
No, I don’t know if Stevens is better than Clifford. But I think he deserved a shot based upon a better body of work and solid play over a career. And I also think that he should have been given more of a chance to play based upon the fact that the QB position has not delivered fir PSU in key spots over the past 3 years. Would have loved to have seen if Stevens could have been a difference-maker. What he showed was tempting to say that he might have been able.
What about Clifford’s throw to Polk against Pitt?I was looking forward to seeing Stevens lead us this year as well. I do think that his throwing is questionable and I don't feel like we saw enough to say that he was going to be a good passer. When he did get in the game, he seemingly opted to run. While the design or call of every play is not known, he sure did not have a penchant for giving to his RB.
In fact, for all the time he got in games compared to Clifford, I remember one big throw by each of them. (Stevens to Blacknall and Clifford to George, both TDs)
Personally, I think too many exceptions were made to keep the Stevens family happy. Lion position. The whatever it was that kept him from transferring last year. Inserting him into games of importance, killing momentum. But it is what it is and the winners/losers of it will be figured out in hindsight.
To think that Stevens flashed anything more brilliant than McSorley is reaching. He is bigger, so he might have lowered the shoulder better. If he had a better arm, he would have been the QB at some point. It's asinine to think our coaches kept a better passer, better runner on the sidelines in favor of the scrappy kid just because it was the first decision made.
And I was all aboard the Farmer thing from October or so in, but my only guess is the distinction of starter was a combination of reward/humbling for service/learning. Parsons still played a ton and still accumulated a bunch of tackles.
And you're putting all that on Trace? Does the defense come in to play in any of those losses or perhaps, oh I don't know a WR drop or 2? Or screw ups from the ST's?
SMH.
Where did I say Kentucky was better than Michigan State? Or vice versus?Kentucky is much much better than Michigan State. Of course you know this or ...... Maybe you you clueless. Troll or clueless which is it?
I am pretty sure MacNit07 is actually our old friend MK under a different handle. The dude is mentally challenged. We have not lost many games over the past 3 years. And in many of those losses, our offense and/or Trace in particular put up crazy points or numbers: 2016 Pitt (39 points and a late drop that could have won game ), 2016 USC (49 points and 5 TDs by Trace), 2017 OSU (38 points and big lead in Q4), 2017 MSU (400 yds passing in the rain and a late drop that would have put us in field goal range to win), 2018 OSU (Trace set school record for yards), 2018 MSU (lost on a last second deep TD pass), 2018 Kentucky (led a furious comeback and almost won game with hurt foot).
Since 2016, we have only had 2 losses where we were not in a position to win at the end: 2016 UM and 2018 UM (where Trace played on one leg). That is better than Clemson, Bama and OSU during same time period.
I know people get upset with Franklin. But we just completed one of the best 3 year runs in PSU’s storied history. And we did that coming off crippling sanctions. People really need some perspective.
It was a beauty and kudos to him. Hope to see more of that in 2019.What about Clifford’s throw to Polk against Pitt?
I am pretty sure MacNit07 is actually our old friend MK under a different handle. The dude is mentally challenged. We have not lost many games over the past 3 years. And in many of those losses, our offense and/or Trace in particular put up crazy points or numbers: 2016 Pitt (39 points and a late drop that could have won game ), 2016 USC (49 points and 5 TDs by Trace), 2017 OSU (38 points and big lead in Q4), 2017 MSU (400 yds passing in the rain and a late drop that would have put us in field goal range to win), 2018 OSU (Trace set school record for yards), 2018 MSU (lost on a last second deep TD pass), 2018 Kentucky (led a furious comeback and almost won game with hurt foot).
Since 2016, we have only had 2 losses where we were not in a position to win at the end: 2016 UM and 2018 UM (where Trace played on one leg). That is better than Clemson, Bama and OSU during same time period.
I know people get upset with Franklin. But we just completed one of the best 3 year runs in PSU’s storied history. And we did that coming off crippling sanctions. People really need some perspective.
Sluggo - great example of where we need better play and coaching to make the next step. 1:45 left, all 3 TOS, your own 40 TD line, and we came up totally empty. Disappointing but hopefully we can upgrade and get over the hump. Does not mean Franklin and Trace are bad people. But this clearly illustrates where we must get better and get better players.but if they didn't puke after watching this Sunday AM.....
I mean 4 straight snaps of man free, and they can't gain an inch?
they lined right up in it!! no disguieses, just played it straight.
And they are getting paid millions of dollars?
You coached, you could have had a better plan than this....its not like OSU hadn't played it in the past.
What about Clifford’s throw to Polk against Pitt?
Gone after gone after gone after gone afterPsu should have went after fields or wimbush. Just win baby.
I think they win the same amount of games with either QB, but it’s understandable that Franklin wants to get the Clifford era started with all the young talent at the skill positions. No matter what happens this year, hopefully it’s a great year, but they’ll start 2020 with a very experienced groupMy optimistic spin. You know who's seen Clifford in practice as much as Franklin? Tommy Stevens. Maybe he thinks Clifford is as good as everyone else thinks and, in a competition where he isn't the defacto leader, he has a good chance of losing that competition.
I wish him well where ever he ends up.
I was looking forward to seeing Stevens lead us this year as well. I do think that his throwing is questionable and I don't feel like we saw enough to say that he was going to be a good passer. When he did get in the game, he seemingly opted to run. While the design or call of every play is not known, he sure did not have a penchant for giving to his RB.
In fact, for all the time he got in games compared to Clifford, I remember one big throw by each of them. (Stevens to Blacknall and Clifford to George, both TDs)
Personally, I think too many exceptions were made to keep the Stevens family happy. Lion position. The whatever it was that kept him from transferring last year. Inserting him into games of importance, killing momentum. But it is what it is and the winners/losers of it will be figured out in hindsight.
To think that Stevens flashed anything more brilliant than McSorley is reaching. He is bigger, so he might have lowered the shoulder better. If he had a better arm, he would have been the QB at some point. It's asinine to think our coaches kept a better passer, better runner on the sidelines in favor of the scrappy kid just because it was the first decision made.
And I was all aboard the Farmer thing from October or so in, but my only guess is the distinction of starter was a combination of reward/humbling for service/learning. Parsons still played a ton and still accumulated a bunch of tackles.
He wasn't just anyone.. he was the guy who 3 years ago was in a razor thin battle with the guy who became mister psu... and anyone who actually watched that B/W game had to come out of it wondering who was the better option. TS was that good.So anyone who says 4 years gets to start? Do you realize how ridiculous this is?
Gone after gone after gone after gone after