We've been through this. This is a PSU board, so we all know that Trace didn't transfer. As a result, a perfectly acceptable interpretation of "Trace came from Vandy with Franklin" is that he committed to Vanderbilt when Franklin was the coach there and decommitted and then committed to Penn State when Franklin was named head coach at HV. As Raffycorn said, you're making a distinction without a difference. It's sad that you're alienating a whole group of good posters here for no reason any of us can discern. That's not just sad, it's pathetic.
Jim listen I get it, but this whole situation started with this statement:
because Trace came from Vandy with Franklin
to which I replied.....
Trace came from Vandy?? Hmmm I did not know that. That was it...
then a couple of people said what you said, he committed de committed etc
at that point I said ,'that is entirely different (saying he decommitted) from saying, ' Trace came from Vandy' (, the only way he comes from Vandy is via transfer, and that is the distinction with a difference, and if you cant see that a person decommitting, and a person transferring schools are 2 entirely different situations, then SMH..)
See I think Illinoislion was trying to stir some shiat up when he even posed his thoughts as a question (so he could stand behind the, oh I never said that, I was just asking a question) , Do you think TM got picked over TS because TM came here from Vandy with CJF.
And that why I responded as I did, because his basic premise for his Shiat stirring was flawed
Then I started getting attacked, I defended myself. That's it. So if you think it is pathetic to defend yourself, after you've been called a liar well okay.
FTR, there is a whole group of posters I could care less about , you, however are not among them.