T Barraclough Predictions for a tough weekend?
- Thread starter NittanyChris
- Start date
Agree with the posts above that Nerf was throwing you some love . . . we know you have good connections.
My only quibble, if you can even call it that, is that most of our big names are in the upper 4 weights. So there was an opportunity to be cute with words there if you were indeed talking about any of those guys. 😉
Well, Barraclaugh, clocking in at 11 letters, is the biggest name on the team, so…. edit—oops, as usual I see @Dogwelder beat me to the wordplay….Is
wrestling?
And thanks to everyone for defending me in my sleep—I was indeed attempting to pay @west2east a compliment.
Last edited:
Well, Barraclaugh, clocking in at 11 letters, is the biggest name on the team, so…. edit—oops, as usual I see @Dogwelder beat me to the wordplay….
And thanks to everyone for defending me in my sleep—I was indeed attempting to pay @west2east a compliment.
Not sure I agree with that - R-BY and NL are both in the lighter weights (wrestling rooms are usually divided 3 ways - "light weights" [25, 33, 41], "middle weights" [49, 57, 65] and "heavier weights" [74, 84, 97, HWT]).
Really, are you gonna argue THIS now??
I'm hoping for a 10,000 word dissertation explaining why 174 should be considered the lowest upper weight instead of the highest middle weight.
Arguing? Stated a simple fact 2 of our 4 Returning National Champions ("Big Names" as defined by OP) are in the Lighter Weights, which conflicts with what was posted as to what area of the lineup our "Big Names" reside.
What won't Bushwood argue?
Only Penn state fans picked up on that lol. Our wit and humor are more superior to everyone else along with our wrestling lmfao. We are
Are you going to argue about THIS? Are you going to argue about arguing? Asked and answered your honor
I knew you would chime in! Well done!!Are you going to argue about THIS? Are you going to argue about arguing? Asked and answered your honor
