Wow, is that what you took from that message? Awfully sensitive.Yeah he sucks. You should just forget about him now. No reason to even mention him again
Wow, is that what you took from that message? Awfully sensitive.Yeah he sucks. You should just forget about him now. No reason to even mention him again
I thought u were "bowing out"Yeah he sucks. You should just forget about him now. No reason to even mention him again
Yeah he sucks. You should just forget about him now. No reason to even mention him again
Serious question (and open to anyone with knowledge).....what drone are you flying. Recommendations, what to look for on a purchase, dos and donts, experiences, etc.
We do a lot of traveling and i was thinking of getting into this type of thing.
The Hawks are not going to be the favorites in 2019/20.
Teske
Teasdale (RBY RS)
Lee
Verk
Berge
Cenzo
Hall
Brooks
Beard
Seth or AC
That is more than a year out, but it is certainly a lineup that will likely be favored to continue the roll.
What, do you think I go away? I'm here on the daily. Don't be so surprised when I post a messageRight on queue.
For those who had Turk with a response before lunch, see the pretty lady at the counter and collect your winnings.
#nottiredofwinning
Passive aggressive ... not the first time we've seen that from Iowa.Yeah he sucks. You should just forget about him now. No reason to even mention him again
just the opposite. thought that was pretty clear. guess not.What, do you think I go away? I'm here on the daily. Don't be so surprised when I post a message
All future peaks are guesses dealing with uncertainties. The thing that makes me feel pretty good about those Penn State uncertain guesses is the Sanderson track record. Unless the successes this program has enjoyed has been due to repeated dumb-ass good luck I would expect elite talent to continue to develop top flight skills and succeed at extraordinary levels.We will definitely be strong in 2 years; any team with 2 returning national champions and an AA, with the three returning from this past year's team, is one to be reckoned with.
Next season will tell us a lot about the future of the bottom half of the lineup, and I am in the camp that they will do quite well. Brooks will be huge right out of the gate. Teske and Verk are two of the bigger question marks in tough weight classes. I would be surprised however if they don't AA.
That said, the projected lineup still includes 7 kids we haven't yet seen, so a 70% uncertainly factor is a lot.
Oh, leave us Iowans alone; we want no trouble.Passive aggressive ... not the first time we've seen that from Iowa.
+1I don't really think it is any big deal that an Iowa centered media outlet wrote a very PRO Iowa article about a young athlete that they have high hopes for. You have to do something in the off season to keep the fans excited and anticipating the upcoming season. As far as him thinking he would have won NCAAs, I don't think he would have but as an aspiring athlete you can't go into things thinking about losing. You go in thinking about what you need to do to win.
As long as he isn't against PSU and as long as Iowa doesn't beat PSU at NCAAs I am perfectly happy if he does win plenty of matches.
Most of the vitriol is not directed at the article, but rather at our HR guest who for some bizarre reason feels compelled to police the content of this board. You know, the same guest who says he is "bowing out" of the thread (thankfully), then comes back later, and then apparently doesn't understand when folks poke fun at him for coming back.Why all the vitriol?
I "bowed" out for the night 6 days ago last Sunday. Big difference between policing and defending btwMost of the vitriol is not directed at the article, but rather at our HR guest who for some bizarre reason feels compelled to police the content of this board. You know, the same guest who says he is "bowing out" of the thread (thankfully), then comes back later, and then apparently doesn't understand when folks poke fun at him for coming back.
I submitted a request that his Mod over on HR come here and demand that the Hawkeye fan base grow thicker skin and quit being crybabies.Most of the vitriol is not directed at the article, but rather at our HR guest who for some bizarre reason feels compelled to police the content of this board. You know, the same guest who says he is "bowing out" of the thread (thankfully), then comes back later, and then apparently doesn't understand when folks poke fun at him for coming back.
If you had thicker skin you wouldn't have got banned multiple times on HR.I submitted a request that his Mod over on HR come here and demand that the Hawkeye fan base grow thicker skin and quit being crybabies.
I’ll let ya know when I hear something....
If you had thicker skin you wouldn't have got banned multiple times on HR.
Translated: If JTS had thicker skin, other people wouldn't have objected to him.If you had thicker skin you wouldn't have got banned multiple times on HR.
You have a distorted memory of what went on over there. Tell me who I lashed out at or when I lost my cool. Ya see, doing that more than likely means I’d be breaking rules. That’s where your mod was stuck between a rock and hard place. He had your crybaby fan base over there begging him to “delete” me yet I wasn’t giving him a reason to do so. What was he to do?I mean if he wouldn't have lost his cool and lashed out multiple times due to his thin skin he wouldn't have been banned. Attack? or defend?
As I've told you before, I too broke no rules over there (still waiting for someone to show me where I broke a rule) but was banned, I assume, due to the similar types of crying that was directed at you.You have a distorted memory of what went on over there. Tell me who I lashed out at or when I lost my cool. Ya see, doing that more than likely means I’d be breaking rules. That’s where your mod was stuck between a rock and hard place. He had your crybaby fan base over there begging him to “delete” me yet I wasn’t giving him a reason to do so. What was he to do?
Not sure his decision to call you all out as being thin skinned was the right decision but it sure made for some sweet entertainment..... To me anyway. He did ban me soon after but he pretty much admitted it was easier to just go ahead and do that instead of listening to you whine. His post didn’t solve anything....in fact, it made it worse for him so he gave in.
And so you you know, being banned was well worth it. Absolutely loved one of your guys finally admitting many of your fans there can’t stand hearing opposing views and opinions. I mean it was something everyone already knew but it was quite refreshing having your moderator validate it for the rest of us.
Absolutely loved one of your guys finally admitting many of your fans there can’t stand hearing opposing views and opinions. I mean it was something everyone already knew but it was quite refreshing having your moderator validate it for the rest of us.
Your moderator said nothing was being done to warrant a ban. And that same mod called you a cry baby.I do enjoy the 'geez I get so tired of HR saying all the same things about us' now it's the banging the 'cry baby, I didn't do anything' drum
Really? Other than a vodka drunk compliance officer and different Sandusky duchebags, care to offer a few examples?Pretty sure that happens here often.
Really? Other than a vodka drunk compliance officer and different Sandusky duchebags, care to offer a few examples?
Yet, here u r. Still.
Not much of a ban.
That wasn’t my point, nor does it have anything to do with what I quoted.
Yes it does, but then you knew that.
Your moderator said nothing was being done to warrant a ban. And that same mod called you a cry baby.
Take it up with him....
As I've told you before, I too broke no rules over there (still waiting for someone to show me where I broke a rule) but was banned, I assume, due to the similar types of crying that was directed at you.
Yes, I did, because of three factors at that time. Jimenez was a bit of a veteran and Lee had not even had his first collegiate match yet. Second, and relatedly, wrestlers in high school and wrestlers in college can be two different animals. Three, and, to me, most importantly, I follow high school wrestling NONE, so I didn't know Spencer Lee from the man on the moon, other than the hype I was hearing about him that very day of the UNI Open.If I remember correctly, you thought Johnny Jimenez would give Spencer Lee a good test at the UNI Open. That’s enough to get banned on every wrestling message board.
Ah, I forgot! I WAS right either the same day or a couple of days later about one thing said on HR about Lee: two people said that he'd never lose. I called them out, and, guess what happened not long after?If I remember correctly, you thought Johnny Jimenez would give Spencer Lee a good test at the UNI Open. That’s enough to get banned on every wrestling message board.
Yes, I did, because of three factors at that time. Jimenez was a bit of a veteran and Lee had not even had his first collegiate match yet. Second, and relatedly, wrestlers in high school and wrestlers in college can be two different animals. Three, and, to me, most importantly, I follow high school wrestling NONE, so I didn't know Spencer Lee from the man on the moon, other than the hype I was hearing about him that very day of the UNI Open.
So, what's your point? That I was wrong thinking that Jimenez would give him a test? So, if I can still make my life go on after such an egregious error, why can't you?
I hate the off season.