Maybe the Bucs can use him at 3rd base
. ICU occupancy is in the area of 70% with large teaching hospitals typically 90 % . Hospitals are pulling docs from what is typically their speciality to help with the COVID admissions . For instance my one friend is a Trauma surgeon but a hospital employee . They have pulled him off Trauma and some of his working hours are in COVID patient care .I have also been told that this is typically north of 80% capacity anyway. These beds just don't lie around unoccupied. if they are, they are ripped out and the space used for other activities. I've been told the problem isn't beds but people. They can always move people into other beds, as long as the rest of the equipment is available and. so far, there is plenty of that. The problem is the number of healthcare workers and what shape they are in.
It was reported today that hospitals in Montgomery County Maryland are over 80% full but out of that number only one-fifth of those hospitalized are there with covid. Seemed there are a lot of hospitals that are still doing many elective surgeries and needing to keep people 4 heart-related conditions because they haven't been able to come in for the previous six months.. ICU occupancy is in the area of 70% with large teaching hospitals typically 90 % . Hospitals are pulling docs from what is typically their speciality to help with the COVID admissions . For instance my one friend is a Trauma surgeon but a hospital employee . They have pulled him off Trauma and some of his working hours are in COVID patient care .
Sounds like the normal situation at present. When I was talking to my pulmonologist this summer, he was relaying the fact that some cardiac surgeries were postponed in the spring wave as they weren’t truly emergent / non-elective wtf . Nothing like that going on in December, but the powers to be are closely watching the numbers .It was reported today that hospitals in Montgomery County Maryland are over 80% full but out of that number only one-fifth of those hospitalized are there with covid. Seemed there are a lot of hospitals that are still doing many elective surgeries and needing to keep people 4 heart-related conditions because they haven't been able to come in for the previous six months.
Maybe our boards supply chain guys can solve their problems. Production of Sputnik V is way down from the promised number of 30 million by years end to just two million doses. The reduction is blamed on slow to no vial caps from China, equipment fillers from Japan, reagent shortages from the USA, and bioreactors which grow and ferment vaccine ingredients from Germany, and the USA. "Scaling is a complex process" said the CEO of BIOCAD- per 12/11/2020 WSJ
Maybe our boards supply chain guys can solve their problems. Production of Sputnik V is way down from the promised number of 30 million by years end to just two million doses. The reduction is blamed on slow to no vial caps from China, equipment fillers from Japan, reagent shortages from the USA, and bioreactors which grow and ferment vaccine ingredients from Germany, and the USA. "Scaling is a complex process" said the CEO of BIOCAD- per 12/11/2020 WSJ
I saw a presentation about the Astra Zeneca vaccine that described how the dosage was halved for the first of the two injections due to shortages for some of the participants in the clinical trial. The unexpected thing is that the participants who received the smaller first dose had a more robust immune response overall.Interesting thought from the WSJ 12/11/20 page A13. Not that it would happen , but an excerpt from A Shot (Instead of Two) at Saving Lives by Dr. Mark Segal:
The Pfizer study wasn't designed to put a number on first dose efficacy, but the data in Pfizer's "cumulative incidence curves" suggest at least 75% efficacy for two weeks after the first dose. The question is whether to use the 100 million doses on 50 million people, of whom two doses would protect roughly 47.5 million, or to give one dose each to 100 million people and protect 75 million.
States have the authority to allocate vaccines as they choose, but they are unlikely to deviate from the study protocol unless a federal authority , whether the CDC and Prevention or a corona virus "czar"-- suggests this as an option.
I saw a presentation about the Astra Zeneca vaccine that described how the dosage was halved for the first of the two injections due to shortages for some of the participants in the clinical trial. The unexpected thing is that the participants who received the smaller first dose had a more robust immune response overall.
Interesting data-point... out of 1.3 million active duty armed forces personnel there has been just one death to Covid
I was not able to view the article, but the obvious question is why were these vaccine trial participants being tested for HIV ?
I was not able to view the article, but the obvious question is why were these vaccine trial participants being tested for HIV ?
I was not able to view the article, but the obvious question is why were these vaccine trial participants being tested for HIV ?
I know a guy in our office just got a Covid test and they told him he was negative for COvid but positive for the 'regular' flu virus.
Thanks for the Guardian article.This article from The Guardian explains it pretty well. It has to do with a protein used as a "molecular clamp," which locks in place the synthetic version of the COVID-19 spike protein used in the vaccine. The protein in question are fragments of the glycoprotein 41 protein, which is also found in HIV. There was some concern that using this protein would cause an HIV immune response, so that's why it was being monitored in the trial.
![]()
University of Queensland Covid vaccine: the government's pulled the plug so what happens now?
An order for 51m doses has been cancelled with researchers ‘devastated’ after a trial returned false positive HIV resultswww.theguardian.com
Tom, I get the sense you know something about this subject. My chief concern with any sort of vaccine that uses nucleic acids is that it could result in the incorporation of the segment into nuclear DNA. People have said that this is extremely unlikely and not possible with mRNA. However, I have read that within the last decade data has shown what appears to be evidence of reverse transcription in human cells.
If this could happen, It seems like the main risk to humans would be if a vaccine nucleic acid fragment ended up in germ cell nuclear DNA. This would appear to be mainly a risk for younger males. Maybe it is an incredible longshot, although if these vaccines end up being given on a regular basis, it would seem that the odds of this would go up.
Any thoughts, or do you think this is crazy ?
I do have some knowledge of this subject. That said, reverse transcription was never a focus of mine, so there are many that are better situated to allay concerns than am I. @Art, any chance you could run this past your oldest? I'm sure he's more qualified than I am to respond.
Reverse transcription does take place, in certain conditions. It's part of the sneaky way that HIV gets around the body's defenses. That said, my understanding is that there is no way for the mRNA used in Pfizer or Moderna's vaccine to be incorporated into the body's DNA.
Thanks for the headache, Tom. Without going into details, Fils 1 confirms your understanding.
thanks for checking and confirming, and sorry for any headache which my request caused.
Boulder, we still don’t have a good idea about the durability of the immunity people develop after infection.Here are a few Covid conspiracy theories that took hold and really hurt our ability to most optimally (I mostly blame the media, which is mostly made up of people like this story is referring to):
- This virus might be the only virus in the history of world where we don't have immunity to it upon contracting and recovering from it.
- Anyone contracting Covid is bad (cases going up is necessarily a bad thing).
- Building strength against the virus via natural herd immunity (contracting/recovering) means more people would die.
- Herd immunity only benefits the population if the population reaches the herd immunity threshold.
- Masks don't do anything, they're just the government trying to control us.
- If only more people would wear masks, we could be in a much better place with regards to this virus... Or put another way, we're seeing so many cases because there isn't enough mask compliance.
I could go on. The conspiracy theories that came out of this pandemic - and the critical mass that they gained in the population - are downright frightening.
We really need to force feed STEM on not only our children, but the entire population. We can't let this happen again.
Boulder, we still don’t have a good idea about the durability of the immunity people develop after infection.
This pandemic is less than a year old. I know with the four common cold type Coronaviruses, I have read of an average figure of 40 weeks. It’s hard to imagine this number is consistent across the four different types and all the health and immunity variables in populations.
We also know that with SARS and MERS, immunity appears to last for at least a decade after infection.
I was talking with my cousin who worked for Merck and was involved in vaccine development. She said that some of the people in the field with whom she maintains contact say that people will need to be vaccinated annually for SARS CoV- 2.
Consistent with what I have seen in travel in 11 states in last few months.Delphi Research showing 99% to 95% mask compliance in every major (by population) county in America