Same as I called the Big Ten tournament. 1) Hold your seed and 2) Bonus points. Even then, we have more room for error than at Big Ten's.
1) Hold your seed: Decompression plays a big part in this. For Penn State, using B1G finish and not seed, here's what I see inserted for each weight class;
125: 0, DNP
133: 0, won and will be seeded 1
141: 0, won and will be seeded 1
149: 7-8, finished 7, probably seeded 14-15 imo
157: A bunch, finished 3rd, but lack of matches will make him low-mid teens imo
174: 0, won and will be seeded 1
184: 1, finished 2nd, will be seeded 3-4
197: 0, won and will be seeded 1
285: 1-2, finished 3rd, seeded 4-5 imo
MICH
125: 0, won and will be seeded 1
133: 3, 3rd at B1G's, probably will be about 6 at NCAA's imo
141: A bunch, 4th at B1G's, probably mid-high teens imo
157: About 7, 2nd at B1G's, about 9th seed at NCAA's imo
165: 8-12, 2nd at B1G's
174: 1, 2nd at B1G's, Lewis inserted
184: 0, won and will be seeded 1
197: 3 or so, 3rd at B1G's, Elam, Buchanan and Bonaccorsi inserted
285: 1-2, 4th at B1G's, being 6th would be a potential benefit for Michigan
Soooo, Michigan loses theoretical points, and lots of them, at 141, 157, 165. Fewer points at 133 and 197. I believe Parris will benefit from his seed.
For PSU, big points theoretically only at 149 and 157. Fewer points at 285, and a Brooks 3 seed should be improved upon. Add to that anything that Hildebrandt does as gravy. An AA finish and I'll add the mashed potatoes, giving PSU an even bigger advantage.
2) Bonus Points
PSU outscored Michigan in the Bonus Point battle, I believe, 19 to 8.5. It could be a larger difference at NCAA's.