You didn’t think it was a foul?Refs step in again for acc. Wow decide game again!
Refs step in again for acc. Wow decide game again!
It was a legit call.Refs step in again for acc. Wow decide game again!
Good call. He was bumping into his legs when the ball was still in the shooter’s hand.
Refs step in again for acc. Wow decide game again!
If he wouldn’t have fouled him, the three might have gone in...the foul altered the shot.Refs step in again for acc. Wow decide game again!
What were they supposed to do? Ignore an obvious foul?Refs step in again for acc. Wow decide game again!
Refs step in again for acc. Wow decide game again!
Hate when refs decide games no different than football. And yes I know enough about basketball but thanks for your two cents.raz not know basketball.
You better give him one penny change. Otherwise he will be completely devoid of any sense.Hate when refs decide games no different than football. And yes I know enough about basketball but thanks for your two cents.
raz not know basketball.
And a Auburn player walked on a late three pointer.The blown call was earlier. UVA kid had the ball hit off his leg and then picked it up and start dribbling again. That’s a double dribble. Refs blew that call and that cost Auburn the game more than the three point attempt.
Hate when refs decide games no different than football. And yes I know enough about basketball but thanks for your two .cents.
It was a foul. Nothing controversial about it.“Virginia stuns Auburn on controversial foul”
Yahoo sports
Again my opinion is refs shouldn’t decide game unless it is cut and dry.
You mean you hate when refs decide the game in favor of the ACC[/QUOTE
You do have me there. But I also do not like games decided by the refs. Let the kids play the shot was a Hail Mary and they called the foul. Yes it could have gone both ways. Auburn made a 3 pointer with about 2 minutes left and the guy was fouled and the announcer called it but the refs didn’t.
Hey I’m just quoting the media sports reporters.It was a foul. Nothing controversial about it.
Hey I’m just quoting the media sports reporters.
I know that you are.Hey I’m just quoting the media sports reporters.
Controversial only because it came when it came -- not because it was not a foul.“Virginia stuns Auburn on controversial foul”
Yahoo sports
Again my opinion is refs shouldn’t decide game unless it is cut and dry.
The game was decided by the Auburn kid who fouled the shooter.
The Ref just did his job and blew the whistle.
You are right...but I will bet that you and 99% of the people watching the game didn't know that... None of the announcers knew anything about it and even Charles Barkley admitted he didn't know that rule. If Steratore hadn't mentioned it, nobody would be talking about it.The blown call was earlier. UVA kid had the ball hit off his leg and then picked it up and start dribbling again. That’s a double dribble. Refs blew that call and that cost Auburn the game more than the three point attempt.
The blown call was earlier. UVA kid had the ball hit off his leg and then picked it up and start dribbling again. That’s a double dribble. Refs blew that call and that cost Auburn the game more than the three point attempt.