Great article.
What I question is the notion that Hairball knew or didn't know. Who cares? If he didn't know, which is highly unlikely, he should have known. His DC clearly did. And secondly, the damage was done to other schools. The suspension should be against MICHIGAN, not Hairball specifically. If that is a suspension, so be it. But that is simply a penalty to the university.
Secondly, at NW, the coach was fired even though their investigation showed the coach didn't know about the hazing. I know that is NW and not Michigan, but the "I didn't know" issue wasn't considered an excuse.
Lastly, I found this interesting:
Any Big Ten penalty will be rooted in the conference’s sportsmanship policy, which allows for the commissioner to hand down disciplinary measures for violating the “integrity of competition” in the “competitive arena,” the policy says.
According to the policy, the commissioner can take disciplinary action that is considered “standard” or “major.” Standard action includes a fine not exceeding $10,000 and a suspension of no more than two contests. Major action is anything exceeding those penalties and is subject to approval from the Big Ten executive board of presidents.
Any school targeted for a violation of the sportsmanship policy is permitted a “reasonable timeframe” set by the commissioner to file a response with the league. The conference is believed to have given Michigan a deadline of mid-week to file a response before action is taken.
That would seem to cut off any relief from a legal court action. They've consented to give the B1G and NCAA complete discretion on disciplinary measures relating to the integrity of the competition.