The problem was that Michigan's strength, a very good defensive line, was matched up against the weakest part of OSU, its depleted offensive line. People were losing track that Michigan was playing better -- only losing by 5 to Indiana and giving Oregon something of a tussle. Winning game against NW by about 45 points. You factor that in with Michigan's kicker making a 54 yarder and OSU's kicker choking, it adds up to a loss. Because Howard playing a typical game for him adds a running dimension and is a good passer, I believe he is better for OSU. Happy that McCord had a good season (with one terrible game) for Syracuse.Like I said, Buck, it's one of those interesting questions whose answer can't be proven one way or the other.
However, I'm guessing McCord was not shedding tears at how things worked out for you guys on Saturday.
I do think the playoffs will tell the story. I think Ohio State needs at least two wins accompanied by a solid performance by Howard for the quarterback switch to be judged successful.
But based solely on the most important game of the year, it seems like McCord has an edge. Last season you went into Ann Arbor as an underdog but had a good shot late at pulling off the upset whereas this year you were 20-point favorites at home but were undone by a totally inept offensive performance.