So for sure, it's 16.8% in the four years Iowa didn't win NCAAs. I can read it that way. So the NCAA agreed to limit the sanctions, as proposed, to the totals only in the last 4 years of the scheme.Over 4 years, not 12 years. They only examined 4 years for the report, so I think the real answer is the 20%.
Anyone understand why the report states "The conference and its involved members submitted a [Page 3] supplemental report detailing the overawards in the 1987_88 and 1988_89 academic years, as well as in the 1989_90 and 1990_91 academic years, plus any information regarding overawards in any year for teams involved in NCAA championships"?
Any links to this supplemental report (since every season Iowa wrestling participated in the championship)?
What reason did the NCAA have to state it agreed with the B10 proposed sanctions "because of a lack of intent on the part of the individual institutions to violate NCAA regulations or to gain a competitive advantage"?
Last edited: