Not watching it, and I don’t know, what impact it had, but Mike Hart, UM’s RB coach, was carted off in the 1st quarter per ESPN’s web site. Not a UM fan, but I hope he’s OK. He was one heck of a player.
Couple of horribly biased calls already helping Michigan un a 10-10 game
- Thread starter Online Persona
- Start date
The point of the ball got hit the ground and aided the catch - get a clue
This is absolutely delusion. It's bias making you see what you want to see. That's absolutely a catch and if it wasn't overturned for us you'd be wanting to murder everyone in the Big Ten
You are one of those types that like to just say the opposite of what anyone else says - have fun with that but in this case you are wrong and guess what the officials were as well as shocking as this may be to you. It must be exhausting to be right 100% of the time - in your own mind.
It's exactly the same that I saw. That was not a catch, video evidence of it hitting the ground, yet they still overturn the call on the field. It leads to the TD (aided by a non-call holding on the edge by wr bell) that puts the game away. Just another week for Michigan. Then everyone will wonder why they crap the bed in their bowl game when the calls aren't tilted in their favor.
I'm not at all. The announcers agreed with me this time. When they disagreed with the late hit they knew what they were talking about.
You're 100% wrong here. Couldn't be more wrong.
Unlike most here I own when I'm wrong--see Maryland losing to Purdue. I missed that.
100% a catch and you know it's a catch--you just want to discredit Michigan. Michigan didn't even need that. Indiana had zero chance of winning this game--Michigan's D was too good.
Bowl games don't mean anything. Do you mean playoff? They'll get destroyed if they play Georgia or Bama
Oh - sorry I don’t know the announcers agreed with you - my bad and case closed because the “announcers” agreed with you.
You're missing the point--prior the OP of this thread used the announcers as proof I was wrong when in reality what they say doesn't mean anything. It was a catch--live was it was a catch (refs missed it) and on the replay definitely a catch. If Michigan was Penn State you'd be saying catch.
The nose of the ball absolutely hit the ground. Are you really surprised that "Always-Wrong Douche" is trying to say it didn't???
Trap game and they still win big in the end. You will see an entirely different level of intensity from Michigan next week. No different than their fans commenting on PSU's performance vs. Northwestern.
Fair enough, but they are still a paper tiger, IMHO. Ohio State on the other hand, is the real deal.
I agree about the "paper tiger" comment assuming you mean not on the level of Ohio State. Michigan, Clemson, USC, Tennessee and maybe us and Oklahoma State are in that discussion for the 4th playoff spot. Michigan's definitely a top 10 or 12 team--not sure about 5 but top 10/12
Hope he’s okay too. Sadly, this is likely an adverse reaction to the so called vaccines, but it’ll never be considered as such.
It’s reviewable…one of the criteria is determining if a pass was caught behind or past the line of scrimmage. None of those other things you mentioned are reviewable. (And every play is theoretically reviewed if there is something there to check)
