The playing field was leveled.
Does Tom Brands make his wrestlers better?
- Thread starter dolecda
- Start date
Im certainly going to toast (with strawberry milk of course) slumlord Bob for this on Saturday night.
Bruce Wayne, Tony Stark and Scrooge McDuck. 😁
Do those that engage in message board arguments of opposing fans realize they are arguing with the exception and not the rule? Moat fanbases could care less about these petty arguments that you guys engage in and in fact you come across poorly. And the silly attitude where you don't have to care about what other people think just further demonstrates your ignorance. I know I responded to Wildturk but this goes both ways to include PSU guys on GIA or any other board. Why not focus on strategy, positive comments when warranted (of course removing your fan colored glasses) and stick to facts. Name calling even in jest comes across of lack of intelligent content. I root against Iowa at any cost but still respect their team and fans because they are overwhelmingly good people and I don't dwell on the exceptions.
PS: You can also scroll past without comment, it shows maturity and self-confidence. PSU fans have the trump card of the scoreboard in any debate.
P
When you want to hit a lion make sure to take your head out of its mouth first
Last edited:
I didn't realize there were Moat fans! Are there competitions? How are they scored?
It's not fun for everyone.
Some posters are taking it seriously, and turning things into drama.
If someone bothers you, don't respond. Or just put them on Ignore.
Lately, we've gotten as bad as GIA.
I heard Richie Rich is kicking in for a PSU tunnel…with windows. 👊
ACUHawk doubled down on his baseless cheating claims and added in that Cael's best friend is a child molester.
"I'm not going to get into great deal. I hesitated posting it because it's old news now, and no repercussions are going to happen. It was only relevant because of the timeline in our conversation. I don't consider the camp money cheating. That was him taking advantage of a much more lenient compliance department. I don't believe it's my place to mention the athletes tampered with. But tampering wasn't the only thing, but I'm not posting on here. I wouldn't have a problem discussing it in person. None of it matters now. It's a free for all and it was only brought up to paint the picture of how I feel the momentum changed and what every other school across the country is up against. Also remember what Carl did with Andrew Long. He was willing to do anything it took to win. Now he doesn't have to take those risks due to the momentum they have. Even his child molesting best friend/donor gets very little discussion when it would be national news at Iowa. Iowa is under the microscope for every thing they do. Which is another hurdle that comes with the territory."
That's unrealistic. This is a message board. Arguing and ranting and raving comes with the territory. It's basic human nature.
As an analogy, look at your common house cat. If you take any small object and make jerky movements with it in front of a cat, it will either try to swat it or pounce on it. The reason is that they are hard wired that way. I don't know if it is even possible to train a cat to not do that.
It's the same with message boards. There are always some people who are going to respond to combative language. And to a certain extent, it can be claimed that arguing is one of the main purposes of message boards.
From a personal perspective, I try hard to not post things that are insulting towards others. I don't see any harm in a little spoofing, but I try to make it a rule to not post anything that I wouldn't say in person to the people to whom I am responding. However, that's just my personal choice. I don't expect everyone else to do things the way I choose to do them.
Your analogy means that humans are no more developed than a common house cat? It is not unrealistic to have expectations for others to act with decorum and respect. It is unrealistic to expect perfection in that regard. We can only control our own behavior. We should want to be the best fanbase in the country and that involves holding ourselves to a high standard and calling out those who don't maintain that standard.
Also your expectation of people responding to combative language because its a message board is what has developed to be the norm not what should be expected to be the norm therefore we should always try to change for the better.
Don't forget the PED shade he threw in there. What a freaken clown.
Now he can just ride that momentum and the only questionable area I have now is also irrelevant until the NCAA actually starts doing stringent PED testing.
Your honor - let the record reflect that “acuhawk” was in the bring in AJ Ferrari camp after the Soldier Salute per the poll on GIA
You just don't like tough proselytizing.
Do your own research. Now run along little man, the grownups want to talk.
Little-man phobia will not be tolerated. — Moderation Team
So I'm guessing "cry baby pissy-pants" is off the table too??
OFFENSIVE! Start using APPROVED terms such as size challenged people. 😈
from what Pitteefool's wife tells my wife; he's length challenged.
This board isn't remotely close to that sh&t show. This board polices itself, they do not.
What I said is 100% true. This board is phenomenal at policing itself.
Gee, for the life of me I can't understand why no one is giving you an answer.
That thing was put there for my pleasure, not hers.
Similar threads
