This is great. The new Ohio State fiction, joining pee balloons, arm punts, etc. is "Penn State plays their starters the whole game that's why their stats are so good."
Was much more worried about TCU. OSU beats Penn State by at least two scores. This one won't be close...(m)
By Couch Burner on 07:24:55 09/25/18
Penn State stats grossly inflated by keeping their starters late into games -- nearly lost the App State game, struggle through three quarters with Illinois and even the Pitt game poured it on late. I just don't see OSU talent fading in the second half to allow that.
Also, don't see the same kind of speed on that team. TCU had a lot more team speed. Penn State has a few guys -- but, Ohio State can match them with faster guys.
Biggest worry is the LB and S. But, expect a much tighter rotation. Expect only 2 safeties to play majority of the game and at most 4 linebackers. I would also expect this tighter group to have gotten the majority of reps this week.
Haskins and the WR and Dobbins will be too much for Penn State. This is the best offense OSU has had since 2005-2006. I don't see this being close at all.
Was much more worried about TCU. OSU beats Penn State by at least two scores. This one won't be close...(m)
By Couch Burner on 07:24:55 09/25/18
Penn State stats grossly inflated by keeping their starters late into games -- nearly lost the App State game, struggle through three quarters with Illinois and even the Pitt game poured it on late. I just don't see OSU talent fading in the second half to allow that.
Also, don't see the same kind of speed on that team. TCU had a lot more team speed. Penn State has a few guys -- but, Ohio State can match them with faster guys.
Biggest worry is the LB and S. But, expect a much tighter rotation. Expect only 2 safeties to play majority of the game and at most 4 linebackers. I would also expect this tighter group to have gotten the majority of reps this week.
Haskins and the WR and Dobbins will be too much for Penn State. This is the best offense OSU has had since 2005-2006. I don't see this being close at all.