ADVERTISEMENT

How would you spend $5 million per year to improve Penn State’s men’s basketball?

By that ridiculous logic our football program would be investing a boat load of money back into it every year and every other sport (minus wrestling and men’s b-ball) would cease to exist.

The bottom line is Penn State athletics is one “entity” for financial purposes and management must decide where best to allocate resources. Do I agree we should invest more in basketball, yes, but we can’t have our soccer teams, or any other team, playing on subpar fields or being provided with subpar training equipment and resources.

You misunderstood me as I didn’t say we should cut other sports. I just said basketball shouldn’t be saddled with the responsibility for returning 5+ million dollars every year to the athletic dept. I’m just advocating that the basketball program be allow to spend some, if not all the revenue that sports generates back into the program.
 
And minus wrestling, if we’re only talking about sports operating in the black.

It's as good as operating in the black. In fact, if I were a betting man, I'd be tempted to wager that the next financial statement, due later this year, will show wrestling operating at a profit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ranger Dan
from a quick search, I believe that Penn State men’s basketball makes about $5 million in profit each year. For the sake of this discussion, let’s just assume that this is the actual number. Also, let’s say that football revenue alone will pay for all other sports.

Chambers makes roughly $1 million per year. Would you use all of this money to hire a high profile coach?

Are there BJC facility upgrades that you would fund with this money?

Increase the recruiting budget?

Build an over the top basketball practice and support facility?
This thread is by no means OFFICIAL but i’ll Let it slide
 
Hire a top tier coach. For $4mil you can get almost anyone barring the top 5 & a few with long term ties to their current School. $1mil for staff.

You ask who kenntucky, lousville, Duke, Villanova, UNC would have on their short list if they suddenly needed a new coach. Then hire one of those guys. It's not rocket science.

Let that guy turn things around. He may leave after a couple of successful years, so rinse & repeat until there's sustained success before taking a chance on a lower tier guy. That comes either never, or when there's a program established that's good enough to attract top coaches without overpaying. The market place will make that clear.
 
Hire a top tier coach. For $4mil you can get almost anyone barring the top 5 & a few with long term ties to their current School. $1mil for staff.

You ask who kenntucky, lousville, Duke, Villanova, UNC would have on their short list if they suddenly needed a new coach. Then hire one of those guys. It's not rocket science.

Let that guy turn things around. He may leave after a couple of successful years, so rinse & repeat until there's sustained success before taking a chance on a lower tier guy. That comes either never, or when there's a program established that's good enough to attract top coaches without overpaying. The market place will make that clear.
4 million isn’t bringing the type of guys you’re talking about to Penn State. Who are the top 5 (and long term ties) Say K, Williams, Self, Izzo, Boeheim, Cal, Wright? That’s all you are ruling out? You think then that Tony Bennett is coming here? Rick Barnes is leaving the #1 team for a small bump? Few is leaving Gonzaga?

At 4 million, not even a lock to land a Cronin/Beard/Mussleman type guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ranger Dan
Hire a young, dynamic, up and coming coach from a mid-major or a top assistant from one of the top programs, who has a proven track record of being able to recruit. Basically, we need to find a "Franklin" for the basketball program. $1m/year is a joke for a head coach at a Big 10 school - and won't get it done if you want to get a top notch coach with the hope of making basketball relevant at PSU. Unless you have a coach who can recruit, spending money on facilities, etc. is a waste of money.

How do schools like Villanova, Xavier, Butler, Wisconsin, Temple, Cincinnati, Creighton, Iowa, and Purdue all usually have far better talent and consistently win at a much higher rate than PSU?

I had hopes for Chambers, because of his Philly connections, but other than the one class including Carr, Stevens, and Watkins, he hasn't been able to improve the talent or depth of talent in the program. This is especially true in the front court - other than Watkins, what big men has he been able to get to PSU?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LioninNC
How do schools like Villanova, Xavier, Butler, Wisconsin, Temple, Cincinnati, Creighton, Iowa, and Purdue all usually have far better talent and consistently win at a much higher rate than PSU?

Because these schools are have significant basketball tradition and their alumni and administration care about basketball success.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT