ADVERTISEMENT

Is the B1G even a relevant conference?

LukeIamYourFather

Well-Known Member
Jan 24, 2016
962
817
1
If it's champion is not invited to the playoff, then you have to conclude that the B1G simply isn't relevant as a conference. It might as well be the Big 12 or the MAC. More than likely even the ACC will be respected as a conference. The B1G, not so much.

Hey Jim, should we call it the T1NY? In your horse trading with the committee and other conference heads will you purposely weaken the conference brand to promote one of the only two schools that matter to you? We all know that is how its done. A bunch of pompous a$$es sitting in a board room deciding who the committee is to support for the best team in college football.

Should we put an asterisk on the B1G championship in years that Ohio St or Michigan isn't represented? Is the best team in the B1G not decided in the championship game? Is the best team in the B1G not good enough to compete for a national championship? Is the B1G even relevant?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Howie'81
If it's champion is not invited to the playoff, then you have to conclude that the B1G simply isn't relevant as a conference. It might as well be the Big 12 or the MAC. More than likely even the ACC will be respected as a conference. The B1G, not so much.

Hey Jim, should we call it the T1NY? In your horse trading with the committee and other conference heads will you purposely weaken the conference brand to promote one of the only two schools that matter to you? We all know that is how its done. A bunch of pompous a$$es sitting in a board room deciding who the committee is to support for the best team in college football.

Should we put an asterisk on the B1G championship in years that Ohio St or Michigan isn't represented? Is the best team in the B1G not decided in the championship game? Is the best team in the B1G not good enough to compete for a national championship? Is the B1G even relevant?

Put an "*" on theIr beloved B1G East Division Championship as well - after spewing rhetoric for weeks upon weeks about how incredibly awesome the B1G East Division is and how it contains the best teams in all of college football, the powers that be in b1g shizhole, and their media sycophants, have just ignored the fact that PSU won the B1G East Division Championship ON THE FIELD OF PLAY and has given PSU none of the support provided to the 2nd and 3rd place teams in the division. Odd how PSU can have the best record in the entire b1g shizhole, win the supposedly hardest Division in all of CFB on the field of play including beating daO$U head-to-head but how often do you hear these FACTS in the constant drumbeat of rhetoric and bull$hit spewing forth from the corrupt cesspool known as the b1g shizhole and its hack commissioner??? We all know the b1g shizhole has massive power on the "Selection Committee" and isn't it interesting that the B1G East Division Champion and the team with the absolute best Conference record is ranked not only behind the B1G East Division runner-up, but also behind two teams tied with the third best Conference record. Think about the massive amount of pure, typically bull$hit b1g shizhole hypocrisy it takes to constantly claim the B1G East Division is the hardest Division in all of CFB all season long and now have their shill homer plant, Alvarez, advocate on the Selection Committee for having the B1G East Division Champion, who won it on the field of play, be ranked behind both the 2nd and 3rd place finishers in the East Division, but also Alvarez's former team in the West Division which has an INFERIOR CONFERENCE RECORD (tied for 3rd) as well?!?!

Only in the corrupt POS b1g shizhole could you have this level of abjecy hypocrisy.
 
If it's champion is not invited to the playoff, then you have to conclude that the B1G simply isn't relevant as a conference. It might as well be the Big 12 or the MAC. More than likely even the ACC will be respected as a conference. The B1G, not so much.

Hey Jim, should we call it the T1NY? In your horse trading with the committee and other conference heads will you purposely weaken the conference brand to promote one of the only two schools that matter to you? We all know that is how its done. A bunch of pompous a$$es sitting in a board room deciding who the committee is to support for the best team in college football.

Should we put an asterisk on the B1G championship in years that Ohio St or Michigan isn't represented? Is the best team in the B1G not decided in the championship game? Is the best team in the B1G not good enough to compete for a national championship? Is the B1G even relevant?
THIS!!!
 
I still believe, in spite of all the self-dealing talking heads, that
Alabama is in
If Clemson wins the ACC, they're in
If Washington wins the PAC 12, they're in
If PSU wins the B1G, they're in
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT