ADVERTISEMENT

OT: My poll results (usage of the word "some")

Depends on your definition of cookies.

Non-chocolate chip, some = 1.

Chocolate chip, some = 9.
 
  • Like
Reactions: T J
Depends on your definition of cookies.

Non-chocolate chip, some = 1.

Chocolate chip, some = 9.

What like, mich-nitwit makes me want to toss my cookies or is it some of my chocolate chip cookies.....all of my non-chocolate chip cookies, etc... That's a good idea for a Poll, how many of your cookies does mich-nitwit make you want to toss?
 
"Some," used the way you did in your question, is ambiguous. What I find interesting is your need to prove that you are right.
 
"Existential quantification." Sounds like something a fraternity brother of mine might come up with after smoking a joint.

Brother 1:
"Hey man, I just smoked a doobie and was thinking about having some cookies. All of a sudden I was in an ecstatic state of motus animi continuus and I came up with this here on my notepad.

An existential quantification is a type of quantifier, a logical constant which is interpreted as "there exists," "there is at least one," or "for some."

"I love predicate logic dude! Give me another doobie. I'm a little stuck on the rules of inference part man. I need to tie up the loose ends. Also, get me some cookies bro! I have the munchies and want some, but I'm not sure whether I want 1 or all of them."

Brother 2: "What are you talking about dude? Some is not 1. It's some, you know, more than 1 and not all."

Brother 1: "Ah dude. You didn't even read what I wrote. It's logically sound man. Let's not talk about it anymore. Normal human communication is so untruthful."

Brother 2: Watches as Brother 1 eats all of the cookies. "You ate all of them."

Brother 1: "That's right. I said I was going to eat some, so I ate them all."

Brother 2: "You are messed up man. Don't try to tell me that some is all too."

Brother 1: "Of course, it is dude! The range for some is 1 - 100%. I said I was eating some. Some does not exclude the possibility that all have the characteristic of being a cookie. Now if I had said, I want some, but not all. See! I love logic man! One last thing, the some can be all thing is actually what I've decided to call "universal quantification." That's why I wanted the second doobie. I'm stoked! No more conversation though."
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: LafayetteBear
One thing is for sure. Mn78psu83 has some knowledge about these things. Now, what if a person wanted some some?
 
One thing is for sure. Mn78psu83 has some knowledge about these things. Now, what if a person wanted some some?
That's out of my league. Better ask either Marylin Vos Savant or michnittlion.
 
For those who care about this rather bizarre discussion some of us have had, I did ask my friends/family/colleagues (like I said I word), and I now have results to share.

These are the honest 100% results, and I now present them without further comment.

Question posed: "This is a yes/no question, you must answer one or the other. If there are 10 cookies on a plate, and I eat 1 of those 10 cookies, it is the correct usage of the word "some" if I make a statement of "I ate some of the cookies that were on that plate?"

Yes --- 13 out of 35. (37%)
No --- 22 out of 35. (63%)

(no, I am not among the 35 people who answered)
As I recall from Grammar school (a very long time ago) some was an unspecified number.. So as one educated in the 50's the answer is yes..
 
Results of my poll on who thinks you're a degenerate, shameless, zero-integrity, scUM-loving BOT-bot @sskissing idiot and moron (e.g., a "poser") or a true PSU fan being genuine :

Degenerate, shameless, zero-integrity, scUM-loving BOT-bot @sskissing idiot and moron "poser":

100%

A true genuine PSU fan:

Some of none otherwise known as 0%
Bushwood, Tell us what you really think of the dude, and stop holding back. Classic. LOL...
 
  • Like
Reactions: mn78psu83
We must be married to the same person.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT