At the game today. Cody, Cael, Casey were in the row behind us with a recruit and his Mom. Not sure who it was but the kid was well put together. About Cael’s height
More importantly, did the Mom look like Mrs. Fast Cars?
At the game today. Cody, Cael, Casey were in the row behind us with a recruit and his Mom. Not sure who it was but the kid was well put together. About Cael’s height
Fell behind. Past tense. This would make a good business school case for disruption theory.
They started falling behind when other schools started truly competing, instead of really being happy with occasionally placing top 3. (At the time, Smith and Robinson were the only consistent threats.)
Iowa got disrupted by Ryan and Cael, who were not only serious about winning, but also recruited top athletes instead of guys who fit their system.
Brands has adjusted by expanding their footprint and going after more athletic guys -- but the arms race grew. Michigan got serious about the sport. Missouri, NC State, VT, Nebraska, Iowa State, Wisconsin ... all of them recruiting B10 territory that Iowa used to split with J Rob.
Pure guess: Seminary's 220 Jacob Kaminski (2021). I think he's still uncommitted. UWW world medalist.
Also should've mentioned: for 2020, there are zero uncommitted 184+ wrestlers ranked in the top 50. The remaining ranked guys make no sense for officials -- they could start elsewhere but are pretty much guaranteed depth with Brooks, Beard, and Nevills all potentially shirting this year.
2021 has a number of strong candidates at those weights. Kaminski, Haas, and Craft are the headliners. Nate Schon is also 2021, not sure he's quite at that level, but he's probably under-ranked since he hasn't gone to Fargo or Disney or Super 32.
That leaves flips and depth. Catka would be the only guy worth trying to flip, but we weren't among his finalists, so that's unlikely. That leaves depth guys -- who we need, they're just not as exciting for the fans.
If I read the “dominate the world” chart correctly, it appears the lineup is pretty set through 21-22 season. After that...
For 22-23 season, they would need 149 and 157.
Then the cycle starts all over, again, with a need for another “big 3 or 4”!
Excellent post. I was forming the same thoughts while reading El Jefe’s good post. All business is the same really. If you don’t innovate, someone else will. success can create its own inertia, and I think that happened to Brands and has many others in all walks of life. It isn’t easy being on top and still having the hunger to innovate again and again.Yes - recruiting and when others began innovating. Its a copy cat world, my high school coach would yell “Brawl” at any point during practice and you basically stopped what you were doing, went to neutral and began snapping/cross facing/shoving your partner. This was part of our “Iowa Style” training...in central PA. Iowa was on top, TJ Williams from the Cal St (Poweraide) tournament was heading there, Steiner/McIvalry/Brands pictures were on a poster of last year’s all-Americans. Iowa was IT. We all practiced to be like Iowa. The style was aggressive on the boarder line of fighting. You were going to win by manhandling your opponent, no expression, no joy just business. You were hungry (literally) and mad yet stoic. My sons wrestle now and from their elementary program to their clubs and camps the whole message has changed - score, finesse, create...enjoy this competition. Iowa is just now changing, pictures of Taylor, Wright, Retherford are on the walls. Iowa fell behind when their competition became the innovators.
Give Brands 2 or 3 double recruiting classes again and he might be right there.Excellent post. I was forming the same thoughts while reading El Jefe’s good post. All business is the same really. If you don’t innovate, someone else will. success can create its own inertia, and I think that happened to Brands and has many others in all walks of life. It isn’t easy being on top and still having the hunger to innovate again and again.
Give Brands 2 or 3 double recruiting classes again and he might be right there.
Excellent point, but I was saying just give him 2 or 3 extra recruits a year for 3 or 4 years. You know, Gablesque.Wouldn't that entail leaving Iowa, getting a good replacement in Iowa, destroying another program and returning to Iowa 2 or 3 times? People might start catching on.