I always thought that was why we played the games. To see who was better. Which of our other wins were to teams that were better than us? But more important, which of Ohio State's wins were against such teams? You realize when we reject what happened on the field, we reject the entire purpose of playing the games, right?
you're right - you stated you're not necessarily a top 4 team, but you should be ahead of Ohio State... I guess I was just wondered where that would then put you? a really odd looking poll it would seem.
you didn't address any of the common opponent rhetoric. you write things about rejecting what happens on the field - rejecting the entire purpose... then, do you have the right to reject your outcome vs Michigan? or Pitt. but, lets go back to Michigan - do you have the right to reject that? if not, then should you be ranked ahead of them if you win vs Wisky? or are there excuses and qualifiers attached to that one?