ADVERTISEMENT

So it sounds like the "false narrative" is now the truth...

Both TSM and PSU were made aware of the same info (inappropriate shower that made a PSU GA uncomfortable). One group (PSU) had ZERO control over JS and his access to kids and were not child care experts and were not mandatory reporters.

The other group, TSM, were mandatory reporters and child care EXPERTS who had direct supervision of both JS and his access to kids and were made aware of an incident in 2001 that caused PSU to revoke JS' guest privileges and complain on TSM's doorstep.

Which group deserves more scrutiny and indictments?

Didn't you read the prior posts? The "Jimmy" did it too defense didn't work as a kid
and doesn't work now.
 
Go Buckeyes you scum bags!!!!
Well you certainly showed us!!!!

200.webp
 
  • Like
Reactions: paddle
Yup. The conspiracy nonsense is going to get worse. Do these guys actually think Curley and Schultz were going to testify at their trial? Most defendants do not testify at their own trial, but don't tell that to the self proclaimed law experts you have on this board...


Not testifying at your own trial is one thing but pleading guilty with no plea appears damning for all involved unless you draw conclusions that may or may not be accurate or relevant.
 
Not testifying at your own trial is one thing but pleading guilty with no plea appears damning for all involved unless you draw conclusions that may or may not be accurate or relevant.
There was at least some deal--as the other charges were dropped.
 
There was at least some deal--as the other charges were dropped.


Yeah I assume that as well but who knows. The two of them pleading guilty sucks and looks damning. I get why they pleaded guilty for legal safety probably but if they get jail time or house arrest it doesn't look good for that side of the debate.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT