ADVERTISEMENT

Wrestlestat Tournament Simulation

jmadden1998

Well-Known Member
Jan 26, 2017
3,702
7,847
1
I ran every match through the wrestlestat comparison tool and this is how it came out.

125

1. Figueroa
2. Ramos
3. Strickenberger
4. Spratley
5. Robinson
6. Lilledahl
7. Smith
8. Ventresca

Lilledahl loses to Figs in the semis and loses to Spratley in the consi semis.

133

1. Bouzakis
2. Byrd
3. Ayala
4. Bailey
5. Romney
6. McGonagle
7. Serrano
8. Frost

Davis loses to Byrd in the quarters and loses to McGonagle in the R12

141

1. Mendez
2. Hardy
3. Bartlett
4. Jamison
5. Alirez
6. Happel
7. Tagg
8. Frost

Bartlett loses to Mendez in semis

149

1. Henson
2. Lovett
3. Van Ness
4. McNeil
5. Wasilewski
6. Parco
7. Webster
8. Johnson

Van Ness loses to Lovett in semis

157

1. Shapiro
2. Kasak
3. Blaze
4. Zerban
5. Downey
6. Hipolito
7. Teemer
8. Taylor

165

1. Mesenbrink
2. Caliendo
3. Hall
4. Barraclough
5. Ramirez
6. Minto
7. Mantanona
8. Amine

174

1. Hamiti
2. O'Toole
3. Haines
4. Thompson
5. Kennedy
6. Pinto
7. Ruiz
8. Gaitan

Haines loses to Hamiti in semis

184

1. Keckeisen
2. Starocci
3. Plott
4. McEnelly
5. Berge
6. Arnold
7. Allred
8. Foca

197

1. Cardenas
2. Buchanan
3. Beard
4. Barr
5. Ferrari
6. Salazar
7. Glazier
8. Mac Stout

Barr loses to Beard in the quarters.

285

1. Steveson
2. Hendrickson
3. Kerkvliet
4. Mullen
5. Schultz
6. Trephan
7. Trumble
8. Pitzer

Kerk loses to Hendrickson in the semis

Top 10 Team Scores (keep in mind wrestlestat predicts very few bonus points)

1. Penn St 138.5
2. Okie St 87.5
3. Iowa 85
4. Nebraska 73
5. VA Tech 58.5
6. Ohio St 55.5
7. Cornell 49.5
8. Minnesota 49
9. Northern Iowa 46.5
10. Arizona St 34
 
Using Wrestlestat for match predictions is a sign you have waaaaay to much time on your hands. And are good with wasting it.

Rankings, it's as good as most any algorithm, but H-T-H results it's probably STILL picking DT to beat Dake.

Andrege probably screwed that function of the site up when he tweaked the algorithm to ensure Spencer was predicted to beat every wrestler up to the 174 weight class shortly after his first career match.
 
Using Wrestlestat for match predictions is a sign you have waaaaay to much time on your hands. And are good with wasting it.

Rankings, it's as good as most any algorithm, but H-T-H results it's probably STILL picking DT to beat Dake.

Andrege probably screwed that function of the site up when he tweaked the algorithm to ensure Spencer was predicted to beat every wrestler up to the 174 weight class shortly after his first career match.
 
I ran every match through the wrestlestat comparison tool and this is how it came out.

125

1. Figueroa
2. Ramos
3. Strickenberger
4. Spratley
5. Robinson
6. Lilledahl
7. Smith
8. Ventresca

Lilledahl loses to Figs in the semis and loses to Spratley in the consi semis.

133

1. Bouzakis
2. Byrd
3. Ayala
4. Bailey
5. Romney
6. McGonagle
7. Serrano
8. Frost

Davis loses to Byrd in the quarters and loses to McGonagle in the R12

141

1. Mendez
2. Hardy
3. Bartlett
4. Jamison
5. Alirez
6. Happel
7. Tagg
8. Frost

Bartlett loses to Mendez in semis

149

1. Henson
2. Lovett
3. Van Ness
4. McNeil
5. Wasilewski
6. Parco
7. Webster
8. Johnson

Van Ness loses to Lovett in semis

157

1. Shapiro
2. Kasak
3. Blaze
4. Zerban
5. Downey
6. Hipolito
7. Teemer
8. Taylor

165

1. Mesenbrink
2. Caliendo
3. Hall
4. Barraclough
5. Ramirez
6. Minto
7. Mantanona
8. Amine

174

1. Hamiti
2. O'Toole
3. Haines
4. Thompson
5. Kennedy
6. Pinto
7. Ruiz
8. Gaitan

Haines loses to Hamiti in semis

184

1. Keckeisen
2. Starocci
3. Plott
4. McEnelly
5. Berge
6. Arnold
7. Allred
8. Foca

197

1. Cardenas
2. Buchanan
3. Beard
4. Barr
5. Ferrari
6. Salazar
7. Glazier
8. Mac Stout

Barr loses to Beard in the quarters.

285

1. Steveson
2. Hendrickson
3. Kerkvliet
4. Mullen
5. Schultz
6. Trephan
7. Trumble
8. Pitzer

Kerk loses to Hendrickson in the semis

Top 10 Team Scores (keep in mind wrestlestat predicts very few bonus points)

1. Penn St 138.5
2. Okie St 87.5
3. Iowa 85
4. Nebraska 73
5. VA Tech 58.5
6. Ohio St 55.5
7. Cornell 49.5
8. Minnesota 49
9. Northern Iowa 46.5
10. Arizona St 34
Your post lost credibility at the term "Wrestlestat"
 
133

1. Bouzakis

giphy.gif
 
I ran every match through the wrestlestat comparison tool and this is how it came out.

125

1. Figueroa
2. Ramos
3. Strickenberger
4. Spratley
5. Robinson
6. Lilledahl
7. Smith
8. Ventresca

Lilledahl loses to Figs in the semis and loses to Spratley in the consi semis.

133

1. Bouzakis
2. Byrd
3. Ayala
4. Bailey
5. Romney
6. McGonagle
7. Serrano
8. Frost

Davis loses to Byrd in the quarters and loses to McGonagle in the R12

141

1. Mendez
2. Hardy
3. Bartlett
4. Jamison
5. Alirez
6. Happel
7. Tagg
8. Frost

Bartlett loses to Mendez in semis

149

1. Henson
2. Lovett
3. Van Ness
4. McNeil
5. Wasilewski
6. Parco
7. Webster
8. Johnson

Van Ness loses to Lovett in semis

157

1. Shapiro
2. Kasak
3. Blaze
4. Zerban
5. Downey
6. Hipolito
7. Teemer
8. Taylor

165

1. Mesenbrink
2. Caliendo
3. Hall
4. Barraclough
5. Ramirez
6. Minto
7. Mantanona
8. Amine

174

1. Hamiti
2. O'Toole
3. Haines
4. Thompson
5. Kennedy
6. Pinto
7. Ruiz
8. Gaitan

Haines loses to Hamiti in semis

184

1. Keckeisen
2. Starocci
3. Plott
4. McEnelly
5. Berge
6. Arnold
7. Allred
8. Foca

197

1. Cardenas
2. Buchanan
3. Beard
4. Barr
5. Ferrari
6. Salazar
7. Glazier
8. Mac Stout

Barr loses to Beard in the quarters.

285

1. Steveson
2. Hendrickson
3. Kerkvliet
4. Mullen
5. Schultz
6. Trephan
7. Trumble
8. Pitzer

Kerk loses to Hendrickson in the semis

Top 10 Team Scores (keep in mind wrestlestat predicts very few bonus points)

1. Penn St 138.5
2. Okie St 87.5
3. Iowa 85
4. Nebraska 73
5. VA Tech 58.5
6. Ohio St 55.5
7. Cornell 49.5
8. Minnesota 49
9. Northern Iowa 46.5
10. Arizona St 34
That's a complete dumpster fire of an NCAA for PSU.
Would only be 1 champ, would only be 3 finalists ....
... and PSU still wins by 50+
 
I ran every match through the wrestlestat comparison tool and this is how it came out.

125

1. Figueroa
2. Ramos
3. Strickenberger
4. Spratley
5. Robinson
6. Lilledahl
7. Smith
8. Ventresca

Lilledahl loses to Figs in the semis and loses to Spratley in the consi semis.

133

1. Bouzakis
2. Byrd
3. Ayala
4. Bailey
5. Romney
6. McGonagle
7. Serrano
8. Frost

Davis loses to Byrd in the quarters and loses to McGonagle in the R12

141

1. Mendez
2. Hardy
3. Bartlett
4. Jamison
5. Alirez
6. Happel
7. Tagg
8. Frost

Bartlett loses to Mendez in semis

149

1. Henson
2. Lovett
3. Van Ness
4. McNeil
5. Wasilewski
6. Parco
7. Webster
8. Johnson

Van Ness loses to Lovett in semis

157

1. Shapiro
2. Kasak
3. Blaze
4. Zerban
5. Downey
6. Hipolito
7. Teemer
8. Taylor

165

1. Mesenbrink
2. Caliendo
3. Hall
4. Barraclough
5. Ramirez
6. Minto
7. Mantanona
8. Amine

174

1. Hamiti
2. O'Toole
3. Haines
4. Thompson
5. Kennedy
6. Pinto
7. Ruiz
8. Gaitan

Haines loses to Hamiti in semis

184

1. Keckeisen
2. Starocci
3. Plott
4. McEnelly
5. Berge
6. Arnold
7. Allred
8. Foca

197

1. Cardenas
2. Buchanan
3. Beard
4. Barr
5. Ferrari
6. Salazar
7. Glazier
8. Mac Stout

Barr loses to Beard in the quarters.

285

1. Steveson
2. Hendrickson
3. Kerkvliet
4. Mullen
5. Schultz
6. Trephan
7. Trumble
8. Pitzer

Kerk loses to Hendrickson in the semis

Top 10 Team Scores (keep in mind wrestlestat predicts very few bonus points)

1. Penn St 138.5
2. Okie St 87.5
3. Iowa 85
4. Nebraska 73
5. VA Tech 58.5
6. Ohio St 55.5
7. Cornell 49.5
8. Minnesota 49
9. Northern Iowa 46.5
10. Arizona St 34

Can’t believe wrestlestat has Caliendo losing to Mesenbrink.

woman people GIF by Kathryn Dean
 
I like the information in wrestlestat, some of the predictions make no sense. For example, I would love an explanation as to why WrestleStat predicts Beard to beat Barr? Barr majored Beard. Barr has a much better record against common opponents than Beard. Those results against common opponents are better. Unless WrestleStat knows Barr will have the flu the day he wrestles Beard, no idea how WrestleStat predicts Beard to beat Barr.

Obviously Beard could win, we just saw some Webster beat Van Ness. It is not something an algorithm should be predicting.
 
I like the information in wrestlestat, some of the predictions make no sense. For example, I would love an explanation as to why WrestleStat predicts Beard to beat Barr? Barr majored Beard. Barr has a much better record against common opponents than Beard. Those results against common opponents are better. Unless WrestleStat knows Barr will have the flu the day he wrestles Beard, no idea how WrestleStat predicts Beard to beat Barr.

Obviously Beard could win, we just saw some Webster beat Van Ness. It is not something an algorithm should be predicting.
It’s like autocorrect. Helpful at times; but infuriatingly incorrect too often.
 
I like the information in wrestlestat, some of the predictions make no sense. For example, I would love an explanation as to why WrestleStat predicts Beard to beat Barr? Barr majored Beard. Barr has a much better record against common opponents than Beard. Those results against common opponents are better. Unless WrestleStat knows Barr will have the flu the day he wrestles Beard, no idea how WrestleStat predicts Beard to beat Barr.

Obviously Beard could win, we just saw some Webster beat Van Ness. It is not something an algorithm should be predicting.
not just once, but also in 3rd place bout
 
  • Like
Reactions: mcpat
this prediction could possibly happen, but it has to be the worse case scenario possible and they still win by 50+. Carter losing seems like the most unlikely of these unlikely predictions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: diggerpup
Can someone make sure to save this so we can compare the actual results after it's over I'm interested to see how far it's off lmfao
 
this prediction could possibly happen, but it has to be the worse case scenario possible and they still win by 50+. Carter losing seems like the most unlikely of these unlikely predictions.
Wrestle stat had him dropping a spot, literally after every win a few years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dicemen99
I like the information in wrestlestat, some of the predictions make no sense. For example, I would love an explanation as to why WrestleStat predicts Beard to beat Barr? Barr majored Beard. Barr has a much better record against common opponents than Beard. Those results against common opponents are better. Unless WrestleStat knows Barr will have the flu the day he wrestles Beard, no idea how WrestleStat predicts Beard to beat Barr.

Obviously Beard could win, we just saw some Webster beat Van Ness. It is not something an algorithm should be predicting.
This is a great response to show that @jmadden1998 is just trolling.
 
this prediction could possibly happen, but it has to be the worse case scenario possible and they still win by 50+. Carter losing seems like the most unlikely of these unlikely predictions.
Bouzakis winning is the most off the wall prediction. He’s a fringe AA who’s going to lose his spot to Davino next season. LOL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pitchfork Rebel
Can someone make sure to save this so we can compare the actual results after it's over I'm interested to see how far it's off lmfao
Sure thing.
After NCAAs, you can find the simulation at this link:
 
  • Like
Reactions: FatWoodchuck
I like the information in wrestlestat, some of the predictions make no sense. For example, I would love an explanation as to why WrestleStat predicts Beard to beat Barr? Barr majored Beard. Barr has a much better record against common opponents than Beard. Those results against common opponents are better. Unless WrestleStat knows Barr will have the flu the day he wrestles Beard, no idea how WrestleStat predicts Beard to beat Barr.

Obviously Beard could win, we just saw some Webster beat Van Ness. It is not something an algorithm should be predicting.
Uhh maybe cuz Barr will be wrestling with a torn hamstring ?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT