If you have not watched the Gomez win over Yianni here it is.
Dake lost 4 matches in his career.I disagree. While winning a lot, he was never as dominant as a Dake or Cael. Yianni had plenty of close calls.
But KD wrestled left handed those lost matches and was still tweaking his regressive aging techniques. So ….Dake lost 4 matches in his career.
Gomez had a great game plan for this match. He timed his shots perfectly everytime Yianni would shoot or fake. Yianni left his left leg exposed with weight on it, and Gomez capitalized brilliantly, just missing the takedown in the first (ran out of time) and then the 2 takedowns in the 3rd. This seems like a game plan that could be replicated by the top tier this year and could make this weight interesting.
When ranking the goat of college wrestling how would you rank the criteria in order of importance?? Id probably go with # of titles(bonus for hodge) first, then win/loss record(also some factor competition), then bonus point wins.. obv it’s Cael first then all the 4xer probably have a case for 2nd.. personally I’d go with Dake.. but any future 4xer w/ one loss would have a case too no?I disagree. While winning a lot, he was never as dominant as a Dake or Cael. Yianni had plenty of close calls.
Fair point! At my age detailed memories are in short supply.RBY was winning 8-3 when Gomez hit the headlock.
He also won four titles in four different weight classes and beat David Taylor multiple times.Dake lost 4 matches in his career.
Right after number of titles , need to look at who they wrestled and beat. That is why no matter how much I dislike Dake I put him in as #1When ranking the goat of college wrestling how would you rank the criteria in order of importance?? Id probably go with # of titles(bonus for hodge) first, then win/loss record(also some factor competition), then bonus point wins.. obv it’s Cael first then all the 4xer probably have a case for 2nd.. personally I’d go with Dake.. but any future 4xer w/ one loss would have a case too no?
#1 #1, or #1 runner up?Right after number of titles , need to look at who they wrestled and beat. That is why no matter how much I dislike Dake I put him in as #1
Where can I see this match? was it on BTN+?
Right after number of titles , need to look at who they wrestled and beat. That is why no matter how much I dislike Dake I put him in as #1
At least you didnt emhasize the 4 weights thing, or the “no redshirt” thing.Right after number of titles , need to look at who they wrestled and beat. That is why no matter how much I dislike Dake I put him in as #1
4x OW at NCAAs was Cael as well.At least you didnt emhasize the 4 weights thing, or the “no redshirt” thing.
This aint rocket science dude, Cael never lost, and if that were easy too do then your homie Dake would have done it.
Its becoming more and more apparent as these “once in a generation“ guys (Lee, Hall,Steveson etc etc ) all suffer losses that what Cael did will prolly never be duplicated. That’s the GOAT.
There’s your queue Bordo.
Never?Its becoming more and more apparent as these “once in a generation“ guys (Lee, Hall,Steveson etc etc ) all suffer losses that what Cael did will prolly never be duplicated. That’s the GOAT.
Lots of records will NEVER be broken. Cy Young won 511 games. No pitcher will ever even start that many games let alone win them. There are many other records out there like that.Never?
Every single 'never will be broken' record in every sport gets bested in time. Eventually somone will go undefeated as a 4xer in college wrestling and then the debate with Cael can start. I seriously doubt he will come close to 159-0 though.
Short of longevity based records (see Tom Brady), normal career records can certainly last decades, but eventually...
What makes Cael's achievement even more compelling is his bonus rate, and Hodges. Steiber, Dake, Yanni didn't/won't come close to dominating the competition in the way Cael did. If any of them had gone undefeated there is still a wide gap in terms of dominance, which in my mind is part and parcel of what makes the GOAT.
Wilt.Lots of records will NEVER be broken. Cy Young won 511 games. No pitcher will ever even start that many games let alone win them. There are many other records out there like that.
Never?
Every single 'never will be broken' record in every sport gets bested in time. Eventually somone will go undefeated as a 4xer in college wrestling and then the debate with Cael can start. I seriously doubt he will come close to 159-0 though.
Short of longevity based records (see Tom Brady), normal career records can certainly last decades, but eventually...
What makes Cael's achievement even more compelling is his bonus rate, and Hodges. Steiber, Dake, Yanni didn't/won't come close to dominating the competition in the way Cael did. If any of them had gone undefeated there is still a wide gap in terms of dominance, which in my mind is part and parcel of what makes the GOAT.
Here's a couple others (throw out the one for Lance Armstrong). I was surprised at how many articles there are on this subject. Plenty of other records that some consider "unbreakable".Lots of records will NEVER be broken. Cy Young won 511 games. No pitcher will ever even start that many games let alone win them. There are many other records out there like that.
His scoring record, or his scoring record?Wilt.
I purposely excluded longevity records.Lots of records will NEVER be broken. Cy Young won 511 games. No pitcher will ever even start that many games let alone win them. There are many other records out there like that.
Right after number of titles , need to look at who they wrestled and beat. That is why no matter how much I dislike Dake I put him in as #1
really? he had a few OT matches if I remember. i wish we had wrestlestat back in the day so we could get all of his results.I purposely excluded longevity records.
Going undefeated for 4 years will happen again undoubtedly. In the fashion and level of dominance that Cael displayed, doubtful.
I’ll take credit but that was not intentional hahahahaNice
You’re going to argue Caels dominance now, cmon man you cant be serious.really? he had a few OT matches if I remember. i wish we had wrestlestat back in the day so we could get all of his results.
no he was insanely dominant, but i think it's achievable again. we've seen guys come close already. DT was a fluke pin against Bubba and Dake moving up away for example. Might have been even more dominant honestly.You’re going to argue Caels dominance now, cmon man you cant be serious.
At times, just like me, you can be an idiot. This is one of them. Now that you have the data, calculate both career and tourney bonus percentage, them find someone in the same universe and we can talk.really? he had a few OT matches if I remember. i wish we had wrestlestat back in the day so we could get all of his results.
Let's not go down the "got caught" road. Give Bubba his due.a fluke pin against Bubba
thanks for the info! only confirms my point though. dominance is pretty comparable to DT. some very tight wins, especially early in his career.At times, just like me, you can be an idiot. This is one of them. Now that you have the data, calculate both career and tourney bonus percentage, them find someone in the same universe and we can talk.
Cael Sanderson: College statistics, records, championships
The complete guide to Cael Sanderson's college wrestling career, including records, NCAA championships and a match-by-matching listing from his 159-0 record.www.google.com
really? he had a few OT matches if I remember. i wish we had wrestlestat back in the day so we could get all of his results.
He had 2 tight wins in his first 2 years! 6-5 against Vertus Jones and 4-3 against Damion Hahn. 2 matches in 2 years against very top level competition. His dominance is absolutely on another level and if you do find someone that was possibly close like DT they of course took lossesthanks for the info! only confirms my point though. dominance is pretty comparable to DT. some very tight wins, especially early in his career.
probably read "doubtful" too harshly though. doubtful is right because it's more likely nobody will ever go undefeated again than not. but i don't think it's a level of dominance that is unachievable.