I don't think the Targetting call was bad at all - under the ACTUAL rule (not what individuals "think it should be"), the receiver is a protected "Defenseless Player" and the rule only requires that first initiated contact is delivered to the head-or-neck area (doesn't have to be with crown of helmet - just with whatever body part "first contact" is initiated with). Complete nonsense that the defender did not initiate contact with his shoulder directly into the facemask of the receiver - he absolutely did. To claim that first contact was not forcible is beyond laughable - the receiver's head goes straight back and bounces of ground. Under the ACTUAL NCAA Rule, that is unquestionably Targetting on a player in a "defenseless position".
