ADVERTISEMENT

BIG BALLS

The MSM has no sense of humor as we know! BIG BALLS is Edward Coristine the 19 year old that MUSK hired for the DOGE assignment. Anderson Cooper got all twitter pated and went ape crap over the moniker so Musk said "BIG BALLS IS AWESOME," but did change his moniker to "HAIRY BOLZ!"
Cooper will just have to live with it!
  • Like
Reactions: jjw165

Regime does tactical retreat under fire...digs in for warfare against Tulsi and Kash

The Regime and its servants in the Dem-Media Party don't know whether to shit of wind their wrist watches under the deluge of Trump's executive actions.

Hegseth's confirmation was huge.

Now they're preparing for a last-ditch defense against Tulsi and Kash at DNI and FBI respectively...and they're willing to go to any lengths to stop both.

Unfortunately, they have some weak-ass sell-out Republicans on the payrolls of lobbyists and contractors who've rewarded the Senators well for their support of Forever Wars and the transformation of the FBI from a respected and reversed institution of law enforcement into a bunch of politicized, partisan hacks.

Reading between the lines of some reports and quotes I've read today, I'd say Tulsi is less than a 50-50 proposition for confirmation and Kash is in the range of 50-50.

The Regime and its Dem-Media Party are in an absolute panic at the thought of either one being elevated to the positions for which they were nominated...which is a good enough reason in itself to support them. Any Republican voting against either of them has to pay a high price...and they have to know in advance that they will pay a high price.
  • Like
Reactions: bourbon n blues

Democrats cannot govern

Says................... A DEMOCRAT! BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.... Where the F is @NJPSU ?

The Democrats’ Governance Problem​


They’re bad at it and getting worse.​


https://www.liberalpatriot.com/p/the-democrats-governance-problem

The Democrats’ electoral problems have received a lot of attention—as they should! Whatever the commitments of a political party, they’ve got to be elected to pursue them. But that can distract attention from what they do when they are elected. Typically that underlies electoral problems that come to the fore and explains why it’s rarely enough for a party to tout their allegedly wonderful values or continually disparage their nefarious political opponents to fix their problems.

In other words, governance is key. You’ve got to run the government well and get things done voters care about if you want those voters to stick with you. And that’s where Democrats have been running into problems—big problems.

Think about it. If you wanted safe streets and public order would your first impulse be to turn to…a Democrat? Or if you wanted a secure, actually-enforced border? How about efficient, effective delivery of public services? Or rapid completion of public projects and infrastructure? Or nonideological public administration?

I don’t think on any of these fronts the reaction of a typical voter would be: “Democrats! Of course, I need Democrats to do all these things because they’re so good at them!” On the contrary, it seems like over time Democrats—both nationally and in many localities where they dominate—have become worse and worse at delivering in these areas. That’s a huge problem because why should voters take Democratic plans to improve their lives seriously if Democrats persist in running government so poorly? Democratic governance is their advertising and the advertising makes the Democratic “product” look pretty bad. So voters don’t want to buy it.

Let’s look at some specific areas. Take safe streets and public order. The Democratic-leaning commentator Noah Smith admits:
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT