true. when wisky beat lsu(who later fired their head coach after having a bad first half of the season) people started to think that the bifg 10 was back. osu beat okla so that added to it. for whatever reason(like psu) lsu and okla were not playing good ball then. but they had the reputation as national powerhouses. so that made the big 10 look like the conf to beat. mich, psu, wisc and osu are all good teams, but i felt that these top big 10 teams were not quite all they were cracked up to be. why? osu lost a million starters from last year. this was a rebuilding year for them. mich returned a lot, but had no set qb as the 2nd string from last just was not that good. psu was still developing. wisc has no offense. i think the big 10 i solid, but weaker than the acc and sec. then probably the big 10, pac 12 and big 12. the bowls are kind of proving this.