I'm surprised you didn't know. It's in the NNNNNCAC by laws. Right next to "WE" deserve better.So when they lose, it’s all Franklin’s fault but when they win it’s because of an assistant coach or the players…got it.
I'm surprised you didn't know. It's in the NNNNNCAC by laws. Right next to "WE" deserve better.So when they lose, it’s all Franklin’s fault but when they win it’s because of an assistant coach or the players…got it.
No Kentucky QB has been picked in the NFL draft since 2008. Amazing that in less than a year, they turned Levis into a #1 draft choice (considering how badly the PSU Coaches screwed him up). So I have a hard time seeing where the current staff at Kentucky has a better track record of developing QBs.Haha, right. I didn't understand that comment at all -- what exactly would lead anybody to believe that Levis's time at PSU positions him well for the NFL?
Franklin has done a solid job of getting kids to the pros -- and many of our guys show up at the combine in tip-top condition. That's a credit to the staff. But our QB development is clearly not good.
No Kentucky QB has been picked in the NFL draft since 2008. Amazing that in less than a year, they turned Levis into a #1 draft choice (considering how badly the PSU Coaches screwed him up). So I have a hard time seeing where the current staff at Kentucky has a better track record of developing QBs.
Under the current regime, it seems as if the only players who progress are the ones like Dotson who are blessed with God-given top talent. It seems as if very few kids with lesser God-given talent are coached-up like at many other programs.Kentucky hasn't gotten a 4* QB (or better) since 2014.
Meanwhile, we've gotten loads of 4* QBs with the occasional 5* (Hack). Michael Johnson, Taquon Roberson, Clifford, Villeux, Michael O'Connor, etc.
Look at how awful Roberson -- a 4* recruit -- was in live action. Clifford is what he is after 5 years (and counting). Hackenberg regressed. Obviously too early to tell with Villeux and the incoming guys. But we've had far more talent to work with than UK. Not even remotely close.
Edit: I'm not saying UK develops QBs well, but we have absolutely no leg to stand on in this debate. Our QB development has been abysmal.
Under the current regime, it seems as if the only players who progress are the ones like Dotson who are blessed with God-given top talent. It seems as if very few kids with lesser God-given talent are coached-up like at many other programs.
Yes, because AK was a highly coveted prospect when he left Temple.Under the current regime, it seems as if the only players who progress are the ones like Dotson who are blessed with God-given top talent. It seems as if very few kids with lesser God-given talent are coached-up like at many other programs.
And the guy they credit with Levis improvement is already gone back to the NFL after one year.So I have a hard time seeing where the current staff at Kentucky has a better track record of developing QBs.
I wish Levis had opted to stay. I appreciate why he decided to leave. I also know that 3 offensive coordinators at PSU chose Clifford over him. But the NNNNNCAC is never confused by facts. While they wish to crucify Clifford and the coaching staff, Clifford threw for more yards, in a season where he was injured for more than half.Yes, because AK was a highly coveted prospect when he left Temple.
And the guy they credit with Levis improvement is already gone back to the NFL after one year.
Levis is the same QB we had, just playing behind a better OL and in a scheme that isn't using him like a battering ram. Watch the UGA game. His passing was limited to avoid INTs. At no point was UK ever a threat to win the game. They merely played in an ultra conservative fashion that didn't allow them to lose ugly.
For a program with no history of reloading and one that couldn't even throw a forward pass 2 or 3 seasons ago (go watch them with Lynn Bowden at QB running the Wildcat as the scheme), they have bought into the April May next year draft hype. New OC. 4 new OL. New WRs. Uncertainty at RB. That's not the preseason team I'm predicting to beat UGA in mid November.
Other than Levis.....and IMO the jury is out.....who went on after leaving the coaching dungeon of PSU to shine?Kentucky hasn't gotten a 4* QB (or better) since 2014.
Meanwhile, we've gotten loads of 4* QBs with the occasional 5* (Hack). Michael Johnson, Taquon Roberson, Clifford, Villeux, Michael O'Connor, etc.
Look at how awful Roberson -- a 4* recruit -- was in live action. Clifford is what he is after 5 years (and counting). Hackenberg regressed. Obviously too early to tell with Villeux and the incoming guys. But we've had far more talent to work with than UK. Not even remotely close.
Edit: I'm not saying UK develops QBs well, but we have absolutely no leg to stand on in this debate. Our QB development has been abysmal.
Other than Levis.....and IMO the jury is out.....who went on after leaving the coaching dungeon of PSU to shine?
Hack couldn't keep a job in the NFL or the minor leagues. Nice kid, good soldier, straight out of central casting for a great qb.....until it really counted.
I think the staff did a pretty damn good job with Trace.....but that doesn't fit the narrative.
Bottom line, Levis is at Kentucky, their record has been 57-43 since Franklin came to PSU with 0 top ten finishes.
PSU has been 67-34 with 3 top ten finishes. I get it..."We" deserve better. Who said you play to win the game?
Hack was over rated period. 3 nfl organizations, personal coaches and he couldn't hold a starting job in the bush leagues.Kentucky is also 1-0 against Franklin-led PSU. And not even remotely on par with PSU in terms of tradition, prestige, resources, recruiting prowess, etc. So I would sure hope we'd boast a better record than Kentucky.
Note -- LSU went hard after Stoops. Not so much with Franklin. There's a reason.
It's curious that you mention Hack, because that's exactly the point. Came in as a highly talented 5* QB, and even showed that talent early on. He very clearly regressed under Franklin. And amounted to nothing in the pros. That's a damning indictment of our QB development.
Trace was a warrior. But looked a whole lot lesser of a QB without future pro-bowlers on his offense. He was good in 2018, hardly great. Clearly a step back from 2016-17 -- even before the injuries. He has thrown a total of 10 passes in the NFL -- completing 3 of them. Hardly an advertisement for PSU's QB development.
And then of course Clifford. Let's see if year 5 is where it all comes together, because as it stands it's another case of either stagnating or regressing as time goes on.
Those top-10 seasons are looking farther and farther away in the rear view mirror as we go forward. QB play might have something to do with that, no?
Hack was over rated period. 3 nfl organizations, personal coaches and he couldn't hold a starting job in the bush leagues.
There may be a reason (if its fact) that LSU didn't go after Franklin.....and its not his coaching record.
Yeah Babe Ruth was nothing without Lou Gehrig....you guys are precious.
I'm trying to understand if we are complaining about PSU record or QB's that didn't make it in the pros.
I guess Tebow, Matt Leinart, Steve Spurrier, Andre Ware, Danny Wuerffel, Eric Crouch etc. were just jerking off, cause they never starred in the NFL.
Notice: What makes a winning QB in college does not always translate to NFL success. Yeah, Trace was a warrior BUT......."We" deserve better.
Way more than Uk QB’s. Hell, UK QB’s don’t even get drafted.Yea, because NFL rosters are chock-full of Penn State QBs 🙄
Franklin has gotten two QB’s drafted, Stoops has gotten 0. One of Franklin’s was a guy everyone else recruited as a defensive back, yet Franklin got him drafted as a QB. So it makes far more sense that Levi’s’ time at PSU positions him better for the NFL than at UK unless you’re just a Franklin hater.Haha, right. I didn't understand that comment at all -- what exactly would lead anybody to believe that Levis's time at PSU positions him well for the NFL?
Franklin has done a solid job of getting kids to the pros -- and many of our guys show up at the combine in tip-top condition. That's a credit to the staff. But our QB development is clearly not good.
Oh good lord.Under the current regime, it seems as if the only players who progress are the ones like Dotson who are blessed with God-given top talent. It seems as if very few kids with lesser God-given talent are coached-up like at many other programs.
Hack never lived up to his hype, but that argument has been beaten to death. Trace was recruited by everyone else as a defensive back, yet Franklin developed him into a very successful college QB who got drafted. But it’s easier to hate on Franklin, so I get it.Kentucky is also 1-0 against Franklin-led PSU. And not even remotely on par with PSU in terms of tradition, prestige, resources, recruiting prowess, etc. So I would sure hope we'd boast a better record than Kentucky.
Note -- LSU went hard after Stoops. Not so much with Franklin. There's a reason.
It's curious that you mention Hack, because that's exactly the point. Came in as a highly talented 5* QB, and even showed that talent early on. He very clearly regressed under Franklin. And amounted to nothing in the pros. That's a damning indictment of our QB development.
Trace was a warrior. But looked a whole lot lesser of a QB without future pro-bowlers on his offense. He was good in 2018, hardly great. Clearly a step back from 2016-17 -- even before the injuries. He has thrown a total of 10 passes in the NFL -- completing 3 of them. Hardly an advertisement for PSU's QB development.
And then of course Clifford. Let's see if year 5 is where it all comes together, because as it stands it's another case of either stagnating or regressing as time goes on.
Those top-10 seasons are looking farther and farther away in the rear view mirror as we go forward. QB play might have something to do with that, no?
You want to give the guys around Trace all the credit for Trace having two solid years, but you won’t do the same for Hack having ARob bailing his ass out all the time. Keep on hating.You clearly neglect trends when it's convenient for you to do so.
Hack was better as a freshman than he was as a sophomore or junior under Franklin. Was one of the best freshman QBs in the country, and then took a dive. Gee, why is that? And perhaps his NFL failures relate at least in part to his poor QB growth in 2014-15? Just maybe?
LSU didn't pursue Franklin, because he was in the midst of shitting all over himself for the 2nd consecutive season. Not many coaches amid an 11-11 run are gonna get a heavy look from programs like LSU when they can pursue guys like Lincoln Riley and Brian Kelly instead.
LSU made the right call. As did USC.
You yourself claim incessantly that ADs and their decisions mean more than anybody here. And I agree. The LSU and USC ADs prove that point very well.
Its in print, awesome arm and he is a tough runner.Yeah sure and I am Santa Claus.
UK was pretty good at the ground and pound game, but the OC and QB coach was fresh from the NFL last year and again this year. While they still have the OL they pass a LOT more.No Kentucky QB has been picked in the NFL draft since 2008. Amazing that in less than a year, they turned Levis into a #1 draft choice (considering how badly the PSU Coaches screwed him up). So I have a hard time seeing where the current staff at Kentucky has a better track record of developing QBs.
You mean the OC for the Rams. Ha haIf it’s “their coaching” that developed Levis….how come they’ve never developed another even half way decent QB? Eight years with crap QB’s, a backup from PSU comes there, has a good year, and suddenly the UK staff are QB whisperers…..gimme a break.
Hack was not a fit with Franklin's offense. He also was not so hot under O'Brien. Laying that all on Franklin is not correct. McSorley was a success story, can't deny that. You can nit pick about him to fit a narrative but the big picture is he was an excellent QB for us.Kentucky is also 1-0 against Franklin-led PSU. And not even remotely on par with PSU in terms of tradition, prestige, resources, recruiting prowess, etc. So I would sure hope we'd boast a better record than Kentucky.
Note -- LSU went hard after Stoops. Not so much with Franklin. There's a reason.
It's curious that you mention Hack, because that's exactly the point. Came in as a highly talented 5* QB, and even showed that talent early on. He very clearly regressed under Franklin. And amounted to nothing in the pros. That's a damning indictment of our QB development.
Trace was a warrior. But looked a whole lot lesser of a QB without future pro-bowlers on his offense. He was good in 2018, hardly great. Clearly a step back from 2016-17 -- even before the injuries. He has thrown a total of 10 passes in the NFL -- completing 3 of them. Hardly an advertisement for PSU's QB development.
And then of course Clifford. Let's see if year 5 is where it all comes together, because as it stands it's another case of either stagnating or regressing as time goes on.
Those top-10 seasons are looking farther and farther away in the rear view mirror as we go forward. QB play might have something to do with that, no?
Hack was a slightly over 50% completion passer in high school with 55 TDs and a whopping 33 ints.You clearly neglect trends when it's convenient for you to do so.
Hack was better as a freshman than he was as a sophomore or junior under Franklin. Was one of the best freshman QBs in the country, and then took a dive. Gee, why is that? And perhaps his NFL failures relate at least in part to his poor QB growth in 2014-15? Just maybe?
LSU didn't pursue Franklin, because he was in the midst of shitting all over himself for the 2nd consecutive season. Not many coaches amid an 11-11 run are gonna get a heavy look from programs like LSU when they can pursue guys like Lincoln Riley and Brian Kelly instead.
LSU made the right call. As did USC.
You yourself claim incessantly that ADs and their decisions mean more than anybody here. And I agree. The LSU and USC ADs prove that point very well.
You want to give the guys around Trace all the credit for Trace having two solid years, but you won’t do the same for Hack having ARob bailing his ass out all the time. Keep on hating.
Hack was a slightly over 50% completion passer in high school with 55 TDs and a whopping 33 ints.
There's a trend for you.
Riley left USC so he didn't need to face the SEC meat grinder and let's see if LSU picked a good fit with Brian Kelly.
I'm pretty happy that things worked out and James will be here for the future. I like how he operates and I love seeing the incessant suffering of the NNNNNCAC.
You are aware that football is a team sport?LOL. You're the guy who whined about the media predicting us to finish 8-4 last year in preseason mags, so.....
And you need to read closer, dude. I did not give the guys around Trace "all the credit". I said his performance was very clearly different without the likes of Barkley, Gesicki, and Godwin around. I think that's pretty obvious to anybody capable of examining statistics or watching games.
No one forces you to watch."I like how he operates".
Those mid-tier Florida bowl losses to second-tier SEC teams are something to behold. I'll give you that.
Hackophiles never mention that the NFL coach who knew him best....didn't draft him or sign him as he bounced around the league.Hack was not a fit with Franklin's offense. He also was not so hot under O'Brien. Laying that all on Franklin is not correct. McSorley was a success story, can't deny that. You can nit pick about him to fit a narrative but the big picture is he was an excellent QB for us.
Cliff is so so and Franklin deserves criticism for that. Backup development has been bad culminating in last season's train wreck. Let's see how he develops Villeaux, Allar and Pribula.
Wow, are you saying Quarterbacks play better when they are surrounded by talent? There's a revelation.LOL. You're the guy who whined about the media predicting us to finish 8-4 last year in preseason mags, so.....
And you need to read closer, dude. I did not give the guys around Trace "all the credit". I said his performance was very clearly different without the likes of Barkley, Gesicki, and Godwin around. I think that's pretty obvious to anybody capable of examining statistics or watching games.
Hackenberg did fine his true Freshman season under O’Brien. Was he great? No. Was he lousy? No. But most people were fairly happy and excited for the future. O’Brien left and Hackenberg was not a good fit in Franklin’s offense and unfortunately he did not receive good coaching at Penn State. Hackenberg did not maximize his opportunity in the NFL either and is no longer playing.Hack was not a fit with Franklin's offense. He also was not so hot under O'Brien. Laying that all on Franklin is not correct. McSorley was a success story, can't deny that. You can nit pick about him to fit a narrative but the big picture is he was an excellent QB for us.
Cliff is so so and Franklin deserves criticism for that. Backup development has been bad culminating in last season's train wreck. Let's see how he develops Villeaux, Allar and Pribula.
Hackenberg did fine his true Freshman season under O’Brien. Was he great? No. Was he lousy? No. But most people were fairly happy and excited for the future. O’Brien left and Hackenberg was not a good fit in Franklin’s offense and unfortunately he did not receive good coaching at Penn State. Hackenberg did not maximize his opportunity in the NFL either and is no longer playing.
Compare?Agreed.
Compare Hackenberg's freshman year with Clifford's 5th year senior year. They're remarkably similar statistically and in terms of W-L.
Draw whatever conclusions you may from that.
I don’t recall posting anything about the media saying 8-4….I don’t make predictions prior to a season. Too many things change. And unlike many of the “we deserve better” posters on here, I’m okay with 8-4 in many years and I didn’t think we were going to be all that good last year.LOL. You're the guy who whined about the media predicting us to finish 8-4 last year in preseason mags, so.....
And you need to read closer, dude. I did not give the guys around Trace "all the credit". I said his performance was very clearly different without the likes of Barkley, Gesicki, and Godwin around. I think that's pretty obvious to anybody capable of examining statistics or watching games.
Compare?
Hack career PSU 1235 attempts 693 completed 56.1% 8457 yards 48 td 31 ints 121.4 rating
Cliff career PSU 1005 attempts 607 completed 60.4% 7839 yards 64 td 24 ints. 141.5 rating
Only a moron would draw the conclusion that Hack was the better QB.
You can read it any way you want....Cliff stil had a better year....more yards and less intsYou need to read more closely.
So let's try this again.
Compare Hack's freshman year........with Clifford's 5th year senior year.
Hack was far from over-rated. Period. End of discussion. He came in as a true freshmen, played in a true pro-style offense as a freshmen, continuously improved and played the best game any pro-style QB played the entire decade at Wisconsin and was the the reason for the dominant win. Hack's problem was James Franklin (who wanted to bench him day one) and the clown car full of bumbling idiots he stupidly brought with him from Vanderbilt, and the bad shoulder he left State College with because of the previously mentioned bad actors. Ricky Rahne was the worst QB coach in Big Ten history. John Donovan might be the worst offensive coordinator in history.Hack was over rated period. 3 nfl organizations, personal coaches and he couldn't hold a starting job in the bush leagues.
There may be a reason (if its fact) that LSU didn't go after Franklin.....and its not his coaching record.
Yeah Babe Ruth was nothing without Lou Gehrig....you guys are precious.
I'm trying to understand if we are complaining about PSU record or QB's that didn't make it in the pros.
I guess Tebow, Matt Leinart, Steve Spurrier, Andre Ware, Danny Wuerffel, Eric Crouch etc. were just jerking off, cause they never starred in the NFL.
Notice: What makes a winning QB in college does not always translate to NFL success. Yeah, Trace was a warrior BUT......."We" deserve better.
Yes Hack should be right there with Mahomes and company if it wasn't for Franklin. No accountability on Hack whatsoever. Wake up.Hack was far from over-rated. Period. End of discussion. He came in as a true freshmen, played in a true pro-style offense as a freshmen, continuously improved and played the best game any pro-style QB played the entire decade at Wisconsin and was the the reason for the dominant win. Hack's problem was James Franklin (who wanted to bench him day one) and the clown car full of bumbling idiots he stupidly brought with him from Vanderbilt, and the bad shoulder he left State College with because of the previously mentioned bad actors. Ricky Rahne was the worst QB coach in Big Ten history. John Donovan might be the worst offensive coordinator in history.
Accountability? Franklin, Rahne and Donovan ruined his career before it started. He left Penn State less developed than when he arrived. That takes a special kind of incompetence. Hack willed up to back to back 7 and 5 seasons (with a major shout out to the defense). He paid the price.Yes Hack should be right there with Mahomes and company if it wasn't for Franklin. No accountability on Hack whatsoever. Wake up.
given the history of penn state down the back.I must have missed the clipboard he was carrying when he played in those games. Where did he put it? Down the front or back of his uniform?