I am right now - since you reminded me.56? That's all? I thought you were a lot older.
Did you happen to read the Burroughs interview?
I am right now - since you reminded me.56? That's all? I thought you were a lot older.
Did you happen to read the Burroughs interview?
Not sure insulting Lafayette is appropriate here nor making blanket generalizations about groups of people (fraternity members). If I recall correctly, we were all quite upset with blanket generalizations of all Penn Staters over the last six years.Sorry you are butthurt, but entitled is as entitled does. As for kids all over the USA, I was with a bunch of my friends from PSU this weekend. Two of them have kids in frats, one in NC, one in PA. BOTH OF THEM were having the very chat I am talking about with their own kids just this weekend. Then I get back here today and a local radio guy says he wants me to come on his show to talk about this because HIS kid is president of HIS frat at Shippensburg or someplace.
"Doctors, lawyers, founders of high tech companies, an astronaut, and a U.S. Congressman"????
LOL! Did you go out of your way to pick groups that are known and resented because of the members' sense of entitlement?
creepy that he lives there. I would fire him for having that stuff happen on his watch.That's my understanding. From an article, "He moved into the house after separating from his wife, sources have said." I think he was in PSU Beta Theta Pi as an undergrad. Could be wrong.
First, I am not "butthurt" about anything you might manage to post on these Boards. The point was that you obviously nurse a sense of anger towards fraternities in general, and attempt to assuage it by neatly stereotyping everyone who was ever a member of a fraternity as an "entitled brat." That is laughable. As I noted, some of those brats have enjoyed quite successful careers.
You just posted last week about sittin' on your back porch back thar in West Virginny, takin' pot shots at varmints. Were you sippin' on a jug of shine while doing so?
See how that stereotype thing works, Mountaineer?
So, who in this thread has made a generalization about ALL Greek kids? I have confined my comments to those Greek kids who are alleged to have caused this young man's death.all of you making generalizations about EVERYONE that is greek or has been greek shows you have learned nothing and would have been one of those piling on penn state for the last 6 years.
What blanket generalization about all frat kids? Please pint it out. This was about these kids, mostly from their own testimony.Not sure insulting Lafayette is appropriate here nor making blanket generalizations about groups of people (fraternity members). If I recall correctly, we were all quite upset with blanket generalizations of all Penn Staters over the last six years.
demlion, I know that in a civil case if you are the one who created the peril or hazard that created the need for emergency services, you can be considered negligent for not calling 911. Are there circumstances in criminal proceedings where an individual could be considered negligent for not calling 911? Is it possible to apply the "duty to rescue" to this criminal case? Surely, Tom Kline will use it in wrongful death claim to come in the civil proceedings.So, who in this thread has made a generalization about ALL Greek kids? I have confined my comments to those Greek kids who are alleged to have caused this young man's death.
Let me ask you, was it cowardly or not to fail to call 911?
Well we are all painfully familiar with the mandatory reporter laws, where even if you just walk in on something, you have a duty to report. That is the exception, not the rule.demlion, I know that in a civil case if you are responsible of the peril that created the need for emergency services, you can be considered negligent for not calling 911. Are there circumstances in criminal proceedings where an individual could be considered negligent for not calling 911? Is it possible in this case. Surely, Tom Kline will use it in the civil proceedings.
It's typical of any groups or newsworthy events. The few bad apples or bad incidents are what sticks out the most. One bad incident or event will stick with people more than the good news.all of you making generalizations about EVERYONE that is greek or has been greek shows you have learned nothing and would have been one of those piling on penn state for the last 6 years.
So, who in this thread has made a generalization about ALL Greek kids? I have confined my comments to those Greek kids who are alleged to have caused this young man's death.
Let me ask you, was it cowardly or not to fail to call 911?
I am not going to get in a pissing match with you. You began the thread about Tim living somewhere where there was a good chance of their being underage drinking/sexual assaults. You also mentioned parents calling their sons to talk to them about this event (smart of them, so I agree with you) but then throw in a comment about how "daddy, can't save you..."What blanket generalization about all frat kids? Please pint it out. This was about these kids, mostly from their own testimony.
There is a difference between a lack of common sense and cowardice. One is a simple lack of mental development. the other is a character flaw.Not getting in the middle of your fight, but would like to add something.
As a health nut and health care provider, I am STUNNED by the use of cigarettes in our youth - STUNNED. With all the data, evidence, Hospital statistics, videos of people with cancer imploring people to quit or never start smoking, we STILL have teenagers deciding to smoke. It baffles my mind.
Why do I bring this up? Well, what you and I consider "common sense", others just don't "get it".
You calling 911 is simply "common sense". Even doing what drug addicts sometimes do and drive them to an ER, drop them on the entrance and drive quickly away eluded them.
I'm sure fear of the cops played a role. But, your use of common sense is too logical, sad as that sounds.
Even "strong arming" the one kid who wanted to call 911 is typical. The voice of reason usually is drowned out by the stronger or majority.
Anyway, although I agree with you. I think that your reasoned intelligent brain prevents you from thinking like an idiot. And, that's what people who pick up smoking (for example) or can't figure out to call 911 are...idiots.
While it's an odd choice and not one I would make, if Abbey spared no expense in the renovation and if he handpicked Bream to be a live-in, then I'm sure the advisor quarters were sick. A very small part of me can see the draw.I want to say it was because his relationship broke up and he just needed a place.
That is ALSO taken from the ACTUAL testimony of these frat members. Turns out there was a 100 percent chance of underage drinking because despite the prohibition, they were buying alcohol! Jesus! If a rough part of town has lots of murders, you might feel unsafe there and be more cautious. 6 handle jugs of liquor, 15 boxes of wine? Were they drinking?I am not going to get in a pissing match with you. You began the thread about Tim living somewhere where there was a good chance of their being underage drinking/sexual assaults. You also mentioned parents calling their sons to talk to them about this event (smart of them, so I agree with you) but then throw in a comment about how "daddy, can't save you..."
To be clear, this is an absolute tragedy that could have been prevented and we will certainly see bad characters. After the last six years, I personally do not like to lump everyone in the same basket.
I think I already explained that I watched two of my college classmates discussing that matter with their kids this past weekend. I know I told my kids, do not get me in the spot where I have to go apologize for or try to excuse or pay for your behavior, or you will see how little entitlement to an education you have. I was told the same thing.I am not going to get in a pissing match with you. You began the thread about Tim living somewhere where there was a good chance of their being underage drinking/sexual assaults. You also mentioned parents calling their sons to talk to them about this event (smart of them, so I agree with you) but then throw in a comment about how "daddy, can't save you..."
To be clear, this is an absolute tragedy that could have been prevented and we will certainly see bad characters. After the last six years, I personally do not like to lump everyone in the same basket.
Ah, got it. The benefit of hindsight. If only Tim was omnipotent and knew the dry house was not to stay dry. And for the record, I find it odd that Tim was living at the house. I do appreciate the murder analogy though.That is ALSO taken from the ACTUAL testimony of these frat members. Turns out there was a 100 percent chance of underage drinking because despite the prohibition, they were buying alcohol! Jesus! If a rough part of town has lots of murders, you might feel unsafe there and be more cautious. 6 handle jugs of liquor, 15 boxes of wine? Were they drinking?
That's what I have a hard time with. I feel like they should have some type of culpability, but I'm not sure how much?They lied about and schemed around every single rule regarding both alcohol and hazing--blithely set up people in charge of breaking the rules, funneled money to them to do the forbidden purchases of alcohol to serve to underage people. Piazza gets hurt and the people who were in charge fairly openly decided as a group to not seek care for him. The wishful thinking part is well, we hope he is going to wake up with a bad hangover and won't we look smart if we have not ratted ourselves out?
Bad call. He woke up dead, and there's thousands of feet of video.
Put him in a car and take him to the hospital? Put a squad of guys to work destroying the evidence of all the rule breaking? I am troubled by the notion that they did NOTHING. They are not even very clever criminals. It is like their lives did not prepare them for the notion that there would be consequences if something really bad happened.
That said, I am not sure legally they are in near as much trouble as SPM says, since the thing that outrages everyone, that they did not call 911, is probably not a crime all by itself. Now, once you feed an underage guy a bunch of liquor, the duty to take charge of him starts to float in there, but generally speaking if you did not feed him drinks, your failure to take care of him makes you a coward, a Bad Samaritan, but not a criminal.
DemSo, who in this thread has made a generalization about ALL Greek kids? I have confined my comments to those Greek kids who are alleged to have caused this young man's death.
Let me ask you, was it cowardly or not to fail to call 911?
Look, maybe it was a deal where he lived there in a totally separate apartment with a separate entrance and no interaction with the guys in the frat. If so, then that might be explicable. But if you have been around guys in their teens and early 20s, and the frat has a HISTORY of these violations in the past which caused it to be ordered to be a dry frat, nobody who has been around college students in the teens and 20s is gullible enough to believe that problem isn't just right around the corner.Ah, got it. The benefit of hindsight. If only Tim was omnipotent and knew the dry house was not to stay dry. And for the record, I find it odd that Tim was living at the house. I do appreciate the murder analogy though.
Point out the ones in this thread, Matt. THESE kids have done at least what each of him has testified he did. Are those generalizations?Dem
Read your posts for the last 3 weeks, and you have made more generalizations about fraternity( and sorority as well) members than objective comments
I did. But Tim Piazza is DEAD. There is video, many minutes of it, showing him as he was DYING. It is not the final word. But some of it is undeniable.I don't know anything about this case.....but forgive me if I never trust a Grand Jury Presentment. I seem to remember one that convinced the world that Jerry Sandusky was having anal sex with a "little boy" in the Lasch Building.
I do know that a young man lost his life and it is a tragedy. Didn't anyone else have flash backs of a grand standing AG with the poster board and a press conference designed to poison the jury pool?
I understand. I have learned to wait until the accused presents their side of the case. I guess I'm just an old fool, but I always thought that's how it is supposed to work.I did. But Tim Piazza is DEAD. There is video, many minutes of it, showing him as he was DYING. It is not the final word. But some of it is undeniable.
Matt was exactly correct, Larry- it's been obvious for some time that you have some personal ax to grind on this topic. I generally find you to have a reasonable POV, but you've been in left field on this for awhile now.Point out the ones in this thread, Matt. THESE kids have done at least what each of him has testified he did. Are those generalizations?
Laws are culture. First thing is you take the illegality away so it isn't forbidden fruit. Drinking age is 21, which is higher than other countries. Second thing is parents teach their children moderation. They do this by making alcohol available to kids at a young age so it isn't such a big deal. But can you imagine the outrage if a parent gave a kid a beer or hard alcohol.Yeah, I wonder where it even comes from.
We go to Italy a lot. They essentially don't even HAVE laws regarding alcohol. In most jurisdictions basically no such thing as a liquor license. Anybody can sell anything at any time to anyone. Technically the drinking age is 16 but nobody even asks for ID. Kids are introduced to watered-down wine when they are very young. There's no open container laws, you can buy wine (or liquor) and just hang out in public squares and as long as you don't act badly, nobody will bother you.
But in all the times I've been to Italy -- and we've been to a lot of big university towns -- I can't even remember seeing a single drunk student. People behave themselves. It's not unusual to see four people in Italy share a single bottle of wine for dinner, and when they leave there is still wine in the glasses. I can picture students in Florence congregating near Santa Croce, overflowing out of a bar with glasses of wine and just sitting on the steps of the church on a warm evening and just chilling (and clearly not worried about being arrested). It is about as different from American college students as you could imagine.
It's all culture. It's not law.
I think in the U.S. with drugs and alcohol both we have made it all about law. Somehow people got the idea that police and courts and harsh laws would solve the problem.
What would solve the problem is culture. When the nation really sets its mind to changing culture it can do it -- it's hard but it can be done, it takes political consensus. The government campaign to discourage smoking has been a huge success -- not a total success obviously but smoking is not cool in many quarters.
What it would take to persuade people in the U.S., especially young people, that being drunk is not cool?
I understand. I have learned to wait until the accused presents their side of the case. I guess I'm just an old fool, but I always thought that's how it is supposed to work.
There is a difference between a lack of common sense and cowardice. One is a simple lack of mental development. the other is a character flaw.
That's what I have a hard time with. I feel like they should have some type of culpability, but I'm not sure how much?
The kid took a horrible fall. How hard is it to get someone to drive him to an ER and say he was drinking at a party, fell down a flight of stairs, and I thought it was serious enough to bring him here?
It's not like he OD'd on heroin.
What's the other side of "He's dead?"I understand. I have learned to wait until the accused presents their side of the case. I guess I'm just an old fool, but I always thought that's how it is supposed to work.
Point out the ones in this thread, Matt. THESE kids have done at least what each of him has testified he did. Are those generalizations?
At what point does "no hazing" mean "no hazing?" Was Beta the only frat still doing this lame bs?Dem, your response is very interesting. You did not generalize in this thread. But that is a little like Michy posting about " Never said anything negative about any Paterno", and then adding " in this thread".
I agree the Beta's actions are deplorable and what we know indicate punishment, but you seem to be drawing much more into this when you can.
What is the IFC (remember, THEY joined together in a group) prepared to do to set the good frats apart from the yahoos? You don't wanna be lumped in? Ok, maybe there is something the good frats are doing to set themselves apart here? Cause what I see is a closing of the ranks. Has IFC condemned the hazing? I honestly do not know.Dem, your response is very interesting. You did not generalize in this thread. But that is a little like Michy posting about " Never said anything negative about any Paterno", and then adding " in this thread".
I agree the Beta's actions are deplorable and what we know indicate punishment, but you seem to be drawing much more into this when you can.
They lied about and schemed around every single rule regarding both alcohol and hazing--blithely set up people in charge of breaking the rules, funneled money to them to do the forbidden purchases of alcohol to serve to underage people. Piazza gets hurt and the people who were in charge fairly openly decided as a group to not seek care for him. The wishful thinking part is well, we hope he is going to wake up with a bad hangover and won't we look smart if we have not ratted ourselves out?
Bad call. He woke up dead, and there's thousands of feet of video.
Put him in a car and take him to the hospital? Put a squad of guys to work destroying the evidence of all the rule breaking? I am troubled by the notion that they did NOTHING. They are not even very clever criminals. It is like their lives did not prepare them for the notion that there would be consequences if something really bad happened.
That said, I am not sure legally they are in near as much trouble as SPM says, since the thing that outrages everyone, that they did not call 911, is probably not a crime all by itself. Now, once you feed an underage guy a bunch of liquor, the duty to take charge of him starts to float in there, but generally speaking if you did not feed him drinks, your failure to take care of him makes you a coward, a Bad Samaritan, but not a criminal.
Will this be another PSU black eye?
They should have started by not feeding an underage kid a ton of booze in a very short period of time. I am no prude when it comes to drinking in college - I did it underage in both high school and college but what they did was just stupid and especially since they had issues before at the house. This is not a Frat thing either - I am in no way against Frat's. Had a lot of friends in them and used to drink a lot of beer at their parties but this kids BAC was frightening and yes he could have said I'm not doing this so he also shares some responsibility for his own actions as an adult.Of course they made terrible decisions and showed poor character. You would expect more of college seniors.
But I think it should not be forgotten that they were AFRAID to call 911 because they knew everybody would be arrested and it would probably be the end of the fraternity. They made a gamble, a horrible, horrible gamble, that the kid would be okay and they could dodge the bullet.
But they only made that gamble because the legal repercussions of calling 911 would have been crushing. They knew the fraternity would be banned, they knew kids would get charged with providing alcohol and hazing, they knew a number of kids futures would be ruined with a criminal record.
Nobody is talking about how the harsh legal environment surrounding underage drinking played a role in this young man's death. If there was a way the frat could have called 911 without triggering a giant criminal investigation, they would have called 911 -- he obviously needed help. I don't know why they didn't at least try to get him into a taxi and take him to the emergency room.
I don't know why Larry is denying his bias here since I believe he has stated before that he is a proud GDI. By denying that bias he is exhibiting behavior similar to so many other people condemned in this Board, such as Big 10 refs and, well I don't even know where to start in the Sandusky affair. Perhaps it is just the lawyer in him.Matt was exactly correct, Larry- it's been obvious for some time that you have some personal ax to grind on this topic. I generally find you to have a reasonable POV, but you've been in left field on this for awhile now.
And I say that believing that this particular group deserves whatever ill is coming their way.
He's a neutral/moderate by nature. You can tell by his nickname.I don't know why Larry is denying his bias here since I believe he has stated before that he is a proud GDI. By denying that bias he is exhibiting behavior similar to so many other people condemned in this Board, such as Big 10 refs and, well I don't even know where to start in the Sandusky affair. Perhaps it is just the lawyer in him.