Roar said in another thread that they should be out tomorrow.When do the next coaches rankings come out? Has to be soon, it's been 3 weeks.
I can remember years ago SCHS wrestled at a nearby rival school. The gym was very hot and we all thought it was done on purpose. I believe future PSU wrestler Davey Weber lost that night because of the heat (to another future PSU wrestler).Kidding aside, are excessive temps at Rec Hall really a thing? Was surprised to hear the commentators mention that as impacting the tOSU wrestlers the other night. Seems it would impact our guys equally, not to mention agitating the fans.
Just for you, LemonPie ...When do the next coaches rankings come out? Has to be soon, it's been 3 weeks.
Well psu football didn’t make the playoff in 2016 because they lost twice early. That certainly would seem to be a sport where the ranking is based on body of work.Yes. A ranking is about current performance. Some progress and get better while others fail to. I can’t think of any sport that ranking is mainly based on body of work.
17 is a strange number. Any idea about how it was arrived at?
Just a few guesses...as I honestly don't know for sure.17 is a strange number. Any idea about how it was arrived at?
I can remember years ago SCHS wrestled at a nearby rival school. The gym was very hot and we all thought it was done on purpose. I believe future PSU wrestler Davey Weber lost that night because of the heat (to another future PSU wrestler).
Kidding aside, are excessive temps at Rec Hall really a thing? Was surprised to hear the commentators mention that as impacting the tOSU wrestlers the other night. Seems it would impact our guys equally, not to mention agitating the fans.
That dates you Lorenzo! Of course your moniker does a bit as well. Rich is a great guy and a great coach!Dave Weber! Wow, that's a name from the past
I assume you were referring to the SCAHS team that had Knapp, Fedon, Struble, Scannell, Weber, young Koll and Pifer in the line upThat dates you Lorenzo! Of course your moniker does a bit as well. Rich is a great guy and a great coach!
Haha yet many people argue with me that it should be based on past work. I'm glad someone agrees!Yes. A ranking is about current performance. Some progress and get better while others fail to. I can’t think of any sport that ranking is mainly based on body of work.
No--it goes back before that. It was Dave Weber's and Dave Joyner's Sr year of HS at SCHS--before older Koll was on the team (1967).I assume you were referring to the SCAHS team that had Knapp, Fedon, Struble, Scannell, Weber, young Koll and Pifer in the line up
No--it goes back before that. It was Dave Weber's and Dave Joyner's Sr year of HS at SCHS--before older Koll was on the team (1967).
tom is one of the true gentlemen on this board.Wow, you have been around, I suppose you will be talking about Andy Lentvorsky next.
I'm afraid I don't know that name--must have been before my time! There are limits to how far back I go!Wow, you have been around, I suppose you will be talking about Andy Lentvorsky next.
I assume you were referring to the SCAHS team that had Knapp, Fedon, Struble, Scannell, Weber, young Koll and Pifer in the line up
Park Forest?Went to SCAHS with 5 of those guys [1 in same class, 2 were 1 class older]. Scannell & Knapp I believe were a couple yrs older? Don't recall the other 2 being in the same line-up at that time?? Eric Brugal was a Sr when I was Fr [but Fr were in the Jr Highs in those days].
I agree with Moore retaining his number 1 ranking. There is only one guy who can possibly make an argument for displacing Moore and has 2 losses, including one to a backup. The true rankings at the end of the year will be earned not subjectively given.I would make Cassar the new number one. He beat Moore fair and square in a match so therefore Moore clearly should lose the spot. Sure Cassar lost earlier this year, but we are talking NOW. Cassar at the moment earned the one spot. Hall lost to Valencia in a preseason match and lost the number one spot even though he is undefeated. NATO was number one forever without even wrestling a match at 125 according some rankers. Remember when Gulibon was number one without a match at 141?
When a boxing champion loses a fight, they are no longer Champ. The other guy is. I know wrestling is different and you can not automatically always make the opponent the new number one cause of upsets and crazy things that go down. But I don’t think Moore deserves to stay number one. How can Moore be number one without getting a single TD? IMO Cassar earned the ranking for now, and to have his name pronounced correctly, and Moore should drop to number two.
Haha yet many people argue with me that it should be based on past work. I'm glad someone agrees!
Personally, I don't care about football. Football has so few games compared to matches in wrestling. Football is a team sport. Wrestling can be individual as well and conference champs after determined differently.So you're saying that, in football for example, late season wins should count more heavily than early wins for the purpose of determining a B1G Champion?