ADVERTISEMENT

Michigan - Alabama Citrus Bowl game thread

Michigan winning or losing this game does not decide if they are a good team or a ‘cr@p’ team. It decides if there are 10-3 or 9-4 and that’s it.

Wake Forest losing to MSU makes no difference in how Clemson is seen. USC losing to Iowa makes no difference in how Oregon is seen. Michigan winning or losing this game makes no difference in how PSU is seen.

Nice fairy tale.

None of the games matter. Scores don't matter. It's just all at the discretion of ESPN... :eek::eek::eek:
 
  • Like
Reactions: paws1957
Michigan winning or losing this game does not decide if they are a good team or a ‘cr@p’ team. It decides if there are 10-3 or 9-4 and that’s it.

Wake Forest losing to MSU makes no difference in how Clemson is seen. USC losing to Iowa makes no difference in how Oregon is seen. Michigan winning or losing this game makes no difference in how PSU is seen.
The B10 losing all their bowl games like some hope sure makes it look like Penn State plays in a crap conference and diminishes conference wins and makes losses look worse.
 
The B10 losing all their bowl games like some hope sure makes it look like Penn State plays in a crap conference and diminishes conference wins and makes losses look worse.


Not if Penn State wins a NY6 against a good opponent, right?
 
The only thing that matters is if Penn State wins their games and how they look while playing.

No, according to Brilliance's theory, scUM struggling with Army this year (a game scUM got outplayed in despite being a +20 point favorite) reflected poorly on PSU???
 
The B10 losing all their bowl games like some hope sure makes it look like Penn State plays in a crap conference and diminishes conference wins and makes losses look worse.

I respectfully disagree. Penn State’s final ranking will not change 1 spot if the big ten goes 8-2 or 2-8 in bowls. The only change would be if someone ranked higher loses opening up a spot up.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT