ADVERTISEMENT

OT...MS4s: A Potential Municipal Budgetary Albatross

For those of you not familiar with the acronym, "MS4" is short for "municipal separate storm sewer system." Approximately 14 years ago, many municipalities within Pennsylvania (based on population densities) were required to obtain Nation Pollutant Elimination Discharge System (NPDES) Permits to formally authorize stormwater discharges from existing and future municipal storm sewer systems. Past and current permit requirements essentially entailed/entail public education/outreach relative to the importance of pollutant free stormwater, mapping of municipal storm sewer systems, monitoring of storm sewer systems & elimination of illicit discharges (e.g. illegal sewer connections), proper management of construction and post-construction stormwater runoff, and employing best management practices in municipal operations to mitigate potential stormwater pollution sources.

For most municipalities, the next permit cycle begins in March 2018 and with it come significant additional requirements in many cases. In addition to continuing efforts to address the requirements described above, under the requirements of the 2018 permit, many municipalities will also need to prepare/execute plans to address pollutant reductions within local streams to eliminate existing impairments caused by pollutants such as sediment, phosphorus and nitrogen. Plans to address the required pollutant reductions will likely propose things such as: construction of new stormwater management facilities, retrofit of existing facilities, stream restoration projects, riparian buffer restoration, etc. In other words, municipalities that are subject to the requirements of MS4 permits are going to have to begin (if they have not already) budgeting significant funds to finance projects similar to those referenced above.

In most cases, applications for the 2018 permit renewal are due to DEP in September of this year. Any municipality subject to the requirements of the pollutant reduction plans described above is required to advertise a draft version of the plan for public review no later than early August of this year. Considering the significant costs associated with the permit requirements, it is very likely that municipalities will need to raise taxes, in one form or another, as financing projects related to stormwater pollutant removal will be rather costly in many cases.

For the record,I'm a professional engineer that is currently handling this permit work for a number of municipalities in southeast PA. While some municipalities have been very proactive about educating their respective communities regarding MS4 requirements and implications (taxes and otherwise), other municipalities are not giving the matter the attention it probably deserves. If the program continues in its current trajectory, within several years many municipalities will be struggling to shoehorn the financial obligations of this program into their already, presumably lean budgets.

Although my company has benefited financially from the MS4 program, I am not fan of it. Since its inception, I cannot name a single thing, in my experience, that has been done as a result of the program to significantly clean up stormwater discharges and ultimately improve stream quality. But I will leave my opinion commentary at that, as this post is not intended to have any political slant. I simply wanted to provide this heads-up to any PA residents that may be interested in a matter that could potentially impact their local taxes at some point in the relatively near future.

Happy Independence Day!

Breakfast: How could someone think this was a good idea?

I'm at the airport this morning and had time to get breakfast. So I stopped in Earl of Sandwich (Sammich for the yinzerz). They offer good egg sandwiches, but they come by default with their "breakfast sauce", which is honey mustard. What?! :eek:

The waitress convinced me to get the sauce on the side. It's O.K., but it has no place on a breakfast sandwich.

If you're going to toss your sauce on my breakfast sandwich, make it tasty and fitting for breakfast.

:eek:
  • Like
Reactions: Creek Side

after 25 years, Austin couple exonerated in child abuse case

I post this because many people said that police don't over-charge and innocent people don't get convicted. After 25 years, a couple accused of abusing a child are finally exonerated:

When I began reinvestigating the case in 2008 for the Austin Chronicle, I was stunned to learn that police and prosecutors who had worked the case back in the early ’90s still believed some of the most outrageous allegations leveled against the Kellers. The Austin Police Department refused to release its investigative report on the case, forcing the Chronicle to take the agency to court. We ultimately won the right to full, unredacted access.

After reading the report, it was not hard to understand why the department had fought to keep it secret. It was an ALL-CAPS, run-on-sentence fever dream full of breathless accusations and absent any actual investigation that could prove or disprove the claims. On multiple occasions, the lead investigator took the girl who accused the Kellers to lunch at McDonald’s before setting out for drives in the neighborhood where she would point out locations: Yes, she had been abused there; yes, she recognized the cemetery where the Kellers had killed and buried babies; yes, many of the residents of the quiet neighborhood were in on the hi-jinx. Not once did investigators question the child’s statements.

My reinvestigation of the Keller case turned up evidence that would ultimately lead to their release from prison. The only vaguely physical evidence that tied the couple to any wrongdoing was the testimony of a young emergency room doctor named Michael Mouw, who had examined the girl and concluded there was damage to her vaginal area that could be the result of sexual abuse. As it turned out, the doctor was wrong. Mouw told me that not long after the Kellers were convicted, he attended a medical conference where he learned that what he had interpreted as signs of abuse were nothing more than a normal variant of female genitalia.
These cases are, fortunately, rare. (while being accused is NOT rare) But when prosecution just wants a conviction, hysteria gets stirred up and the press piles on, its hard to get people to think strait.

John Urschel will be speaking to employees where I work today.

John-Urschel-1-600x400.jpg

Speaker Series: John Urschel

John Urschel graduated from Penn State with Bachelors and Masters degrees in Mathematics. Upon graduating in 2014, he was drafted in the 5th round by the NFL’s Baltimore Ravens. In 2016, he began a Doctoral program at MIT studying Applied Mathematics. He’s published several peer-reviewed articles and is an Advanced Stats Columnist for The Player’s Tribune. John was recently highlighted in Forbes’ 2017 “30 under 30” article highlighting his academic and athletic achievements.

John will be sharing his pro football perspective on the use of data and analysis in the NFL.

Family style dinner at the Kitchen Table in Myrtle Beach

Hello everyone. We are starting family style dinners at the kitchen table in Myrtle beach and I need your help. Can you tell me the food that your mom used to make at the dinner table. Entrees and sides or dishes. Casseroles etc. We will be rotating dishes throughout the year and we love to put guest recipes on the Table! Thanks for your help and I look forward to the conversation.

Need I be a skeptic about organic?

I essentially believe that it is healthier (in general) and safer than processed and non-organic equivalents. My skepticism is in the vein, "How do I know it really is?" My children purchase mostly only organic for the dozen grandchildren. The only thing I've ever purchased organic is the chickens in my Amish neighbors front yards and my archery license! So is it really organic because the label says so? Thank you!

David Taylor Wrestling.....Disappointment

I'm a huge DT fan and hope to see him win an Olympic gold some day. That being said, I've never been disappointed in him on a particular match. I've been disappointed for him on the Dake matches and Bubba match but never disappointed in him. This one is different.

Now, I know he (nor anyone) gives two shits of what I think, but I think he quit during that 3rd match. The sweat/grease on the mat was absolutely ridiculous, Cox is an extremely tough nut to crack, Cox should have been on the clock, etc., but I think DT gave up on all his offensive arsenal during the last half of match.....after Cox was hurt.

I think DT will recover fine and eventually have an Olympic spot but that was very disappointing for me to watch.

OT: lawnmower

So we moved to a new house about 2 years ago and got rid of the big yard. Our current home has about 1/3 of an acre....so I no longer have my riding mower....just a self propelled Toro with Briggs & Stratton engine. I am sick of having to tinker with it and repair every couple of months.

Does anyone have any experience with the Ryobi electric mower or the Ego? A neighbor said I could try out his Ego electric but I wanted to see if anyone else had any feedback for use of electric mower on small, flat yard.

I like the idea of no longer having to full with gas and oil etc.

Thanks in advance.

Appears that one of the victims is unhappy with his financial settlement

Does anyone have access to this article? Appears that one of the victims is unhappy with his settlement.

https://www.law360.com/whitecollar/articles/931641

Sandusky Accuser's Atty Faces $3M Abuse Settlement Suit
By Matt Fair

Law360, Philadelphia (June 6, 2017, 2:44 PM EDT) -- One of ex-Penn State University assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky’s purported sex abuse victims filed a $2.8 million lawsuit against his former attorney on Monday, alleging that he was plied with alcohol and coerced into signing a settlement that significantly undervalued his molestation claims.

A malpractice complaint lodged in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas accuses Albert Torrence, an attorney from Beaver County in western Pennsylvania, of taking then-client Stephen Milbourne to a bar where, instead of being walked thoroughly through the settlement offer, he...

To view the full article, register now.

Cal Is F*'d Because Of Its Stupid Stadium Deal

Literally that's the title of this article...

... The Bears now owe at least $18 million per year in interest-only payments on the stadium debt, and that number will balloon to at least $26 million per year in 2032 when Berkeley starts paying off the principal stadium cost. Payments will increase until they peak at $37 million per year in 2039, then subside again in 2051 before Berkeley will owe $81 million in 2053. After that, the school is on the hook for $75 million more and will have six decades to pay it off. The stadium might not get paid off until 2113, by which time, who knows, an earthquake could send the stadium back into the earth or football as we know it might be dead......


Let's hope we avoid this fiasco with our upcoming reno of the Beav coming up.
  • Like
Reactions: psu1969a
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT