ADVERTISEMENT

Bartlett vs Sokol at WNO

He’s a relentless and brutally strong hand fighter, with good attacks and upper body skill. Classic Gable style. Seems like a good kid. It’d be ok with me if he were a Nittany Lion, but I hope Cenzo sticks him in CHA this year all the same.
 
I like watching the bull wrestle- he does shut down the true attacks against the best guys, but so does every wrestler not named Nolf. I was fortunate enough to get the opportunity to visit with Alex and he comes off as a really humble young man. I dislike Iowa (or at least the idea of Iowa) as a team, but individually I am a fan of several of those guys. Lee,DeSanto, and Bull all wrestle hard and aggressive most of the time. Warner will when he gains a little more confidence at this level, and the young hwt Cass is a flat out fun guy to watch.
 
He is a dirt ball. And that's ok. Just calling it like I see it.
A dirt ball? Ouch, my feelings are bruised. Other than making fun of your HR brethren I am not sure what has hurt your ego to the point of name calling. But hey, you must be you so continue being you.
 
The only downside to putting someone on ignore. Sometimes it takes a while to understand wtf is going on in a thread. I have no interest in sweet corn, cornhole (or cornholing), or one's ability to procreate. Beyond that, he's your common, everyday troll.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pointingdogsrule
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Nitlion6 calling out another poster for not being objective..... The dictionary doesn't even define irony this well.
I may get a bit over zealous with my blue and white PSU shades, but when I am claiming PSU will beat Iowa (or wherever you think my lack of objectivity lies) my assertion lies closer to an objective statement than anything I generally see from the Hawk forum faithful.
 
I may get a bit over zealous with my blue and white PSU shades, but when I am claiming PSU will beat Iowa (or wherever you think my lack of objectivity lies) my assertion lies closer to an objective statement than anything I generally see from the Hawk forum faithful.
Why bother wishing they were objective? It is their forum and if they want to be wildly irrational, let them. Most fans don't choose their teams or picks on astute reasoning, but rather on emotions and hopes. I know I have irrational hopes for most PSU teams :rolleyes:
 
Since we’re talking Hawk Hands... Ouch



Surprised more guys don’t do the “speed skater” aka RBY on that kid.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jtothemfp
Desanto was calling for stalling and his fist hit Gavin in the arm. Common mistake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nitlion6
Diceman - quick question. Why is Bartlett listed in red text in your spreadsheet as opposed to blue as with the other verbals? I hope this doesn't imply risk.
 
Unless I'm missing something, you need goggles.

Not only some fresh google's but maybe some more grey matter to boot.

Howard and Dunbar are in bold blue as expected for commits. Bartlett is on bold red. My eyes tell me red indicates red shirt eligible - which as highschools none are eligible but one could argue all three will be.

It makes sense to have a designator such as a verbal gets one color and a NLI another but I don't see anything like that in your legend.

I reference your sheet all the time and translate much into one of my own but I admit I am out to lunch on this one. I even have spreadsheets for the full roster every year capturing team points in every match and every tournament round going including consis dating back a number of years. You helped started that obsession for me :)
 
Not only some fresh google's but maybe some more grey matter to boot.

Howard and Dunbar are in bold blue as expected for commits. Bartlett is on bold red. My eyes tell me red indicates red shirt eligible - which as highschools none are eligible but one could argue all three will be.

It makes sense to have a designator such as a verbal gets one color and a NLI another but I don't see anything like that in your legend.

I reference your sheet all the time and translate much into one of my own but I admit I am out to lunch on this one. I even have spreadsheets for the full roster every year capturing team points in every match and every tournament round going including consis dating back a number of years. You helped started that obsession for me :)
Looks blue to me?
 
Dice, should H. Catka be removed after committing to Va Tech?

 
Last edited:
I just pulled up the spreadsheet on my iPhone and Bartlett is Red while both Howard and Dunbar are Blue.

Thank you, I am not crazy. Whether I open in chrome or Google drive I still see red ;-)

htmlview
 
This is as good a place as any to mention: State College finally has a decent, reasonably authentic, fresh, and cheap Mexican joint. Seems only fitting it would show up at one of the last Uni-Marts in the area—across from Harner’s Farm on rt. 26
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jtothemfp
My iPad shows Bartlett in red, Howard and Dunbar in blue. On my iPhone, all three are blue. WTH????‍

If the spreadsheet is done in Excel, I have experienced cases where color-coding is reversed when the sheet is created on a Mac and then opened in Windows. Maybe the reverse (or something analogous) is happening here? I've had trouble with Google Sheets appearing differently among devices, as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cali_Nittany
Are they links? A visited link will often display in a different color than a non-visited link.
Ski, I’m not sure I understand your question. Both my iPad and iPhone displayed @diceman99’s spreadsheet in docs.google.com. I have previously visited this spreadsheet on both my iPad and iPhone, but never took notice to the difference in colors.
 
Ski, I’m not sure I understand your question. Both my iPad and iPhone displayed @diceman99’s spreadsheet in docs.google.com. I have previously visited this spreadsheet on both my iPad and iPhone, but never took notice to the difference in colors.

If you are on a web page with links on it, most browsers by default will display links on the page that you have visited in a different color than ones you haven’t visited yet.

If you visited a link on one device/browser but you have not visited that same link on the other device/browser, that could account for the difference you are seeing.
 
All blue to me on my windows computer and iPhone.

And no, they are not links.
 
I couldn't share their page here--so I picked the first picture they had--I had tostadas and a tamale--both were excellent. Also--Mole is awesome.

I've only tried Eastern Mole, mainly because I couldn't afford Star-nosed at the time. I suppose I'd give it a try if reviews indicated it was, indeed, far superior. But none of that Mole-rat stuff (it's not true mole).
 
I've only tried Eastern Mole, mainly because I couldn't afford Star-nosed at the time. I suppose I'd give it a try if reviews indicated it was, indeed, far superior. But none of that Mole-rat stuff (it's not true mole).
Oh yeah, to me, a mole can be a bellwether of authenticity. If it’s just sweet and vaguely tangy with a touch of biter, the place is posing. it needs to be deep, smoky, and surprising. And nutty. This place. is legit—everything is hand made from the tortillas to the Agua de Jaimaca, to the delightfully spicy guac.
 
Oh yeah, to me, a mole can be a bellwether of authenticity. If it’s just sweet and vaguely tangy with a touch of biter, the place is posing. it needs to be deep, smoky, and surprising. And nutty. This place. is legit—everything is hand made from the tortillas to the Agua de Jaimaca, to the delightfully spicy guac.
That does not sound appealing. :confused: I would rather have Taco Bell at 2am than whatever deep nutty mole dish you are describing
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT